Literature DB >> 31742589

BLOOD PRESSURE TRAJECTORIES IN YOUTH AND HYPERTENSION RISK IN ADULTHOOD: THE 1970 BRITISH COHORT STUDY.

Mark Hamer1, Mika Kivimäki2, G David Batty2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31742589      PMCID: PMC7156137          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


× No keyword cloud information.
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. a Sample sizes vary; n = 5,212 had data for ages 10 and 46 years; n = 2,486 had data for ages 10, 16, and 46 years. b Stable, low: systolic BP below the median (100 mm Hg) at baseline and below the median (13 mm Hg) for increase in systolic BP between ages 10 and 16 years; low + increase: baseline SBP of <100 mm Hg and an increase of ≥13 mm Hg; stable, high: baseline SBP of ≥100 mm Hg and change of <13 mm Hg; high + increase: baseline SBP of ≥100 mm Hg and change of ≥13 mm Hg. c Adjusted for sex, body mass index, sports participation at age 10 years, father’s occupation, and parental smoking. During the last 10 years, raised blood pressure (BP), including hypertension, has been the leading contributing factor to cardiovascular disease burden globally (1). Current prevention strategies target adults, but intervention earlier in the life course might be needed to significantly reduce cardiovascular disease risk in adults. The degree to which BP tracks from childhood to adulthood varies by sex, age, and length of study follow-up, suggesting that a single BP measurement might not be enough to identify children who could benefit from early interventions (2). Sparse data exist on BP trajectories from this earlier period. In one study, a “high, increasing” trajectory was associated with carotid intima-media thickness and left ventricular mass index in adulthood (3). We hypothesized that repeat BP measurements in childhood would allow identification of BP trajectories that reliably predict adulthood hypertension. Adulthood diabetes, another major risk factor for cardiovascular health, was examined as a secondary outcome. We used data from the 1970 British Cohort Study of people born in England, Scotland, and Wales in a single week of 1970 (4). Cohort members underwent clinical examinations at ages 10, 16, and 46 years that included measurement of BP using a mercury sphygmomanometer in childhood and an automated Omron HEM-907 monitor (Omron Healthcare, Inc., Bannockburn, Illinois) in adulthood. A total of 5,212 people (2,674 women; 51.3%) had complete data on baseline and adulthood BP, and 2,486 (1,337 women; 53.8%) provided data for all 3 assessments. Close agreement has been shown between the auscultation and oscillometric devices (5). High BP in childhood was defined using the 95th percentile for systolic and diastolic BP relative to sex and height at age 10 years (6). Hypertension at age 46 years was defined as systolic/diastolic BP of at least 140/90 mm Hg taken from the average of the second and third readings after 5 minutes seated rest, and/or prescribed antihypertensive medication (confirmed from British National Formulary codes on medication dispensers) (7). For analyses using the continuous BP data, a constant of 10 mm Hg was added to systolic and diastolic BP in participants taking antihypertensive medication (8). A diabetes outcome in adulthood was generated from data on physician-diagnosed diabetes and/or glycated hemoglobin of at least 48 mmol/mol (>6.5%). We generated four BP trajectories using baseline systolic BP at age 10 years and the change in BP between ages 10 and 16. “Stable, low” was defined as systolic BP below the median (100 mm Hg) at baseline and below the median (13 mm Hg) for increase in systolic BP between ages 10 and 16 years; “low + increase” was baseline SBP of <100 mm Hg and an increase of ≥13mm Hg; “stable, high” was baseline SBP of ≥100 mm Hg and change of <13 mm Hg; “high + increase” was baseline SBP of ≥100 mm Hg and change of ≥13 mm Hg. The association of BP trajectory with hypertension and diabetes outcomes at age 46 years was examined using logistic regression models where the relationship was adjusted for sex, body mass index, sports participation at age 10 years, father’s occupation, and parental smoking. All analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). At the age-46 follow-up, 702 cases of hypertension and 202 cases of diabetes were recorded. High BP (based on 95th percentiles) was evident in 1.9% of the cohort at age 10 years and, compared with normal BP, was associated with approximately a doubling of hypertension risk at age 46 years (odds ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.60, 3.88) (Table 1), although not with diabetes (odds ratio = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.53, 2.92). Between the assessments at ages 10 and 16 years there was, on average, an increase in both systolic (98.1 vs. 111.1 mm Hg; P < 0.001) and diastolic (62.4 vs. 69.3 mm Hg; P < 0.001) BP. Participants who had elevated systolic BP at age 10 years that continued to rise above average levels through to age 16 demonstrated a more than 2.6-fold increased odds of hypertension by middle age (Table 1), although no associations were observed for diabetes (odds ratio = 1.64, 95% CI: 0.71, 3.76). Compared with cohort members classified as having a “stable, low” trajectory, systolic BP at age 46 years was elevated by 3.3 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.4, 5.2) in the “low + increase” group, 5.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 3.3, 7.0) in “stable, high” group, and 8.4 (95% CI: 6.2, 10.7) mm Hg in the “high + increase” group after adjusting for covariates. Differences in diastolic BP followed a similar pattern; 2.6 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.1, 4.0) in the “low + increase” group, 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.0, 4.8) in “stable, high” group, and 5.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.1, 7.5) in the “high + increase” group.
Table 1

Crude Risk per 1,000 Person-Years and Odds Ratios for the Association Between Baseline Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Trajectory During Ages 10–16 Years, and Risk of Hypertension at Age 46 Years, Great Britain, 1980–2018

BP and Trajectory b Total No. No. of Hypertension Cases Risk Per 1,000 Person Years OR c 95% CI
BP, age 10 years
 Normal5,1126724.21.00Referent
 High 100 3011.92.481.60, 3.88
BP trajectory, from ages 10 to 16 years
 Stable, low 346 282.41.00Referent
 Low + increase 890 1114.01.470.95, 2.29
 Stable, high 9041324.71.731.12, 2.66
 High + increase 346 778.02.611.63, 4.20

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

a Sample sizes vary; n = 5,212 had data for ages 10 and 46 years; n = 2,486 had data for ages 10, 16, and 46 years.

b Stable, low: systolic BP below the median (100 mm Hg) at baseline and below the median (13 mm Hg) for increase in systolic BP between ages 10 and 16 years; low + increase: baseline SBP of <100 mm Hg and an increase of ≥13 mm Hg; stable, high: baseline SBP of ≥100 mm Hg and change of <13 mm Hg; high + increase: baseline SBP of ≥100 mm Hg and change of ≥13 mm Hg.

c Adjusted for sex, body mass index, sports participation at age 10 years, father’s occupation, and parental smoking.

In the present study, we have shown that BP in childhood is an important predictor of hypertension risk in middle-aged adulthood. Thus, childhood might be a key period for early intervention. The trajectory in BP from ages 10 to 16 years was further able to discriminate differences in hypertension risk at age 46 (middle age). Although annual BP measurement after 3 years of age is supported by some, such as American Academy of Pediatrics (9), others have not endorsed such recommendations (10). Our findings support recommendations to track BP trajectories in clinical settings.
  10 in total

1.  Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Martin D Tobin; Nuala A Sheehan; Katrina J Scurrah; Paul R Burton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Cohort profile: 1970 British Birth Cohort (BCS70).

Authors:  Jane Elliott; Peter Shepherd
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Screening for primary hypertension in children and adolescents: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Chen; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Blood Pressure Trajectories From Childhood to Young Adulthood Associated With Cardiovascular Risk: Results From the 23-Year Longitudinal Georgia Stress and Heart Study.

Authors:  Guang Hao; Xiaoling Wang; Frank A Treiber; Gregory Harshfield; Gaston Kapuku; Shaoyong Su
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Joseph T Flynn; David C Kaelber; Carissa M Baker-Smith; Douglas Blowey; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen R Daniels; Sarah D de Ferranti; Janis M Dionne; Bonita Falkner; Susan K Flinn; Samuel S Gidding; Celeste Goodwin; Michael G Leu; Makia E Powers; Corinna Rea; Joshua Samuels; Madeline Simasek; Vidhu V Thaker; Elaine M Urbina
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Establishing International Blood Pressure References Among Nonoverweight Children and Adolescents Aged 6 to 17 Years.

Authors:  Bo Xi; Xin'nan Zong; Roya Kelishadi; Young Mi Hong; Anuradha Khadilkar; Lyn M Steffen; Tadeusz Nawarycz; Małgorzata Krzywińska-Wiewiorowska; Hajer Aounallah-Skhiri; Pascal Bovet; Arnaud Chiolero; Haiyan Pan; Mieczysław Litwin; Bee Koon Poh; Rita Y T Sung; Hung-Kwan So; Peter Schwandt; Gerda-Maria Haas; Hannelore K Neuhauser; Lachezar Marinov; Sonya V Galcheva; Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh; Hae Soon Kim; Vaman Khadilkar; Alicja Krzyżaniak; Habiba Ben Romdhane; Ramin Heshmat; Shashi Chiplonkar; Barbara Stawińska-Witoszyńska; Jalila El Ati; Mostafa Qorbani; Neha Kajale; Pierre Traissac; Lidia Ostrowska-Nawarycz; Gelayol Ardalan; Lavanya Parthasarathy; Min Zhao; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  SeongIl Choi; Yu-Mi Kim; Jinho Shin; Young-Hyo Lim; Sung-Yong Choi; Bo-Youl Choi; Kyung-Won Oh; Hyung-Min Lee; Kyung-Ji Woo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The mediating pathways between parental separation in childhood and offspring hypertension at midlife.

Authors:  Sebastian Stannard; Ann Berrington; Nisreen A Alwan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.