OBJECTIVE: To examine sex differences in the relation of childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) to systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) trajectories during 15 years, spanning young (mean [M] [standard deviation {SD}] = 30 [3] years) and middle (M [SD] = 45 [3] years) adulthood, independent of adult SES. METHODS: A total of 4077 adult participants reported father's and mother's educational attainments at study enrollment (Year 0) and own educational attainment at enrollment and at all follow-up examinations. Resting BP also was measured at all examinations. Data from examination Years 5 (when participant M [SD] age = 30 [3] years), 7, 10, 15, and 20 are examined here. Associations of own adult (Year 5), mother's, and father's educations with 15-year BP trajectories were examined in separate multilevel models. Fully controlled models included time-invariant covariates (age, sex, race, recruitment center) and time-varying covariates that were measured at each examination (marital status, body mass, cholesterol, oral contraceptives/hormones, and antihypertensive drugs). Analyses of parental education controlled for own education. RESULTS: When examined without covariates, higher education - own (SBP γ = -0.03, DBP γ = -0.03), mother's (SBP γ = -0.02, DBP γ = -0.02), and father's (SBP γ = -0.02, DBP γ = -0.01) - were associated with attenuated 15-year increases in BP (p < .001). Associations of own (but not either parent's) education with BP trajectories remained independent of standard controls. Sex moderated the apparent null effects of parental education, such that higher parental education-especially mother's, predicted attenuated BP trajectories independent of standard covariates among women (SBP γ = -0.02, p = .02; DBP γ = -0.01, p = .04) but not men (SBP γ = 0.02, p = .06; DBP γ = 0.005, p = .47; p interaction SBP < .001, p interaction DBP = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood socioeconomic status may influence women's health independent of their own adult status.
OBJECTIVE: To examine sex differences in the relation of childhood socioeconomic status (CSES) to systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) trajectories during 15 years, spanning young (mean [M] [standard deviation {SD}] = 30 [3] years) and middle (M [SD] = 45 [3] years) adulthood, independent of adult SES. METHODS: A total of 4077 adult participants reported father's and mother's educational attainments at study enrollment (Year 0) and own educational attainment at enrollment and at all follow-up examinations. Resting BP also was measured at all examinations. Data from examination Years 5 (when participant M [SD] age = 30 [3] years), 7, 10, 15, and 20 are examined here. Associations of own adult (Year 5), mother's, and father's educations with 15-year BP trajectories were examined in separate multilevel models. Fully controlled models included time-invariant covariates (age, sex, race, recruitment center) and time-varying covariates that were measured at each examination (marital status, body mass, cholesterol, oral contraceptives/hormones, and antihypertensive drugs). Analyses of parental education controlled for own education. RESULTS: When examined without covariates, higher education - own (SBP γ = -0.03, DBP γ = -0.03), mother's (SBP γ = -0.02, DBP γ = -0.02), and father's (SBP γ = -0.02, DBP γ = -0.01) - were associated with attenuated 15-year increases in BP (p < .001). Associations of own (but not either parent's) education with BP trajectories remained independent of standard controls. Sex moderated the apparent null effects of parental education, such that higher parental education-especially mother's, predicted attenuated BP trajectories independent of standard covariates among women (SBP γ = -0.02, p = .02; DBP γ = -0.01, p = .04) but not men (SBP γ = 0.02, p = .06; DBP γ = 0.005, p = .47; p interaction SBP < .001, p interaction DBP = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood socioeconomic status may influence women's health independent of their own adult status.
Authors: Deborah A Levine; Cora E Lewis; O Dale Williams; Monika M Safford; Kiang Liu; David A Calhoun; Yongin Kim; David R Jacobs; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: Hypertension Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: G D Friedman; G R Cutter; R P Donahue; G H Hughes; S B Hulley; D R Jacobs; K Liu; P J Savage Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1988 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Judith E Carroll; Tara L Gruenewald; Shelley E Taylor; Denise Janicki-Deverts; Karen A Matthews; Teresa E Seeman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Bradley M Appelhans; Melissa D Latham; Michelle A Irving; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Shaoyong Su; Xiaoling Wang; Jennifer S Pollock; Frank A Treiber; Xiaojing Xu; Harold Snieder; W Vaughn McCall; Michael Stefanek; Gregory A Harshfield Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Shakira F Suglia; Allison A Appleton; Maria E Bleil; Rebecca A Campo; Shanta R Dube; Christopher P Fagundes; Nia J Heard-Garris; Sara B Johnson; Natalie Slopen; Catherine M Stoney; Sarah E Watamura Journal: Prev Med Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 4.018