Literature DB >> 35486169

Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weili Ma1, Jiwei Mao2, Jianfeng Yang1, Ting Wang1, Zhen Hua Zhao3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically assess the early detection rate of biochemical prostate cancer recurrence using choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA.
METHODS: Under the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines, literature that assessed the detection rates (DRs) of choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence was searched in PubMed and EMBASE databases for our systematic review from 2012 to July 15, 2021. In addition, the PSA-stratified performance of detection positivity was obtained to assess the DRs for various methods, including fluciclovine, PSMA, or choline PET/CT, with respect to biochemical recurrence based on different PSA levels.
RESULTS: In total, 64 studies involving 11,173 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the studies, 12, 7, and 48 focused on choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA, respectively. The pooled DRs were 24%, 37%, and 44%, respectively, for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001); 36%, 44%, and 60% for a PSA level of 0.5-0.99 ng/mL (p < 0.001); and 50%, 61%, and 80% for a PSA level of 1.0-1.99 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The DR with 18F-labeled PSMA was higher than that with 68Ga-labeled PSMA, and the DR was 58%, 72%, and 88% for PSA levels < 0.5 ng/mL, 0.5-0.9 ng/mL, and 1.0-1.99 ng/mL, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The DRs of PSMA-radiotracers were greater than those of choline-radiotracers and fluciclovine-radiotracers at the patient level. 18F-labeled PSMA achieved a higher DR than 68Ga-labeled PSMA. KEY POINTS: • The DRs of PSMA-radiotracers were greater than those of choline-radiotracers and fluciclovine-radiotracers at the patient level. • 18F-labeled PSMA achieved a higher DR than 68Ga-labeled PSMA.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Positron emission tomography; Prostatic neoplasms; Recurrence

Year:  2022        PMID: 35486169     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08802-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  75 in total

1.  Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Liran Domachevsky; Hanna Bernstine; Natalia Goldberg; Meital Nidam; Onofrio A Catalano; David Groshar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Levent Kabasakal; Emre Demirci; Jamal Nematyazar; Reşit Akyel; Baresh Razavi; Meltem Ocak; Aslan Aygun; Can Obek; Ali R Kural
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 3.  Prostate cancer-specific PET radiotracers: A review on the clinical utility in recurrent disease.

Authors:  Jaden D Evans; Krishan R Jethwa; Piet Ost; Scott Williams; Eugene D Kwon; Val J Lowe; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 4.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Steven P Rowe; Jeremie Calais; Michael S Hofman; Tobias Maurer; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Clemens Kratowchil; Ken Herrmann; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  PSMA-targeted Radiotracers versus 18F Fluciclovine for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Udochukwu Oyoyo; Niusha Bavadian; Nicholas Ferguson; Anudeep Mukkamala; Jeremie Calais; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The utility of PET-based imaging for prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niranjan J Sathianathen; Mohit Butaney; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The positivity rate of 68Gallium-PSMA-11 ligand PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Manuela A Hoffmann; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Helmut J Wieler; Thomas Höfner; Jonas Müller-Hübenthal; Ludwin Trampert; Mathias Schreckenberger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke-Hao Pan; Jin-Feng Wang; Chun-Ying Wang; Abdul Aziz Nikzad; Fang Q Kong; Li Jian; Yin-Qiu Zhang; Xiao-Ming Lu; Bin Xu; Ya-Li Wang; Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rang Wang; Guohua Shen; Mingxing Huang; Rong Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  1 in total

1.  Salvage Nodal Radiotherapy as Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Detected by Positron Emission Tomography Shows Favorable Outcome in Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jörg Tamihardja; Leonie Zehner; Philipp Hartrampf; Dominik Lisowski; Susanne Kneitz; Sinan Cirsi; Gary Razinskas; Michael Flentje; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.