Literature DB >> 28864615

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy.

Matthias Eiber1,2, Wolfgang P Fendler3,4, Steven P Rowe5, Jeremie Calais3, Michael S Hofman6, Tobias Maurer7, Sarah M Schwarzenboeck8, Clemens Kratowchil9, Ken Herrmann10, Frederik L Giesel9.   

Abstract

The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PC) cells. Therefore, the targeting of PSMA has become increasingly important over the last decade. Glu-urea-based PSMA ligands used for both imaging and radioligand therapy are the mainstays of the current success. For PET imaging, both 68Ga- and 18F-labeled agents have been successfully translated to clinical applications. Mainly retrospective cohort studies have shown a high value in the setting of biochemical recurrence, with high detection rates even in the presence of low prostate-specific antigen levels. Preliminary data indicated that radioguided surgery with PSMA ligands may help to further improve patient outcomes because it facilitates the removal of small tumor deposits that are otherwise difficult to detect. For primary PC, PSMA ligand PET imaging has been shown to be superior to cross-sectional imaging for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes. In addition, it promises to also provide intraprostatic tumor localization, especially when used in combination with multiparametric MRI. Increasing numbers of studies have reported considerable changes in management resulting from PSMA ligand PET imaging for both biochemical recurrence and primary disease. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-based radioligand therapy has demonstrated a reasonable response, mainly as defined by a prostate-specific antigen response of more than 50%, comparable to other recently introduced agents. Especially given the high level of safety of 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy, with only minimal grade 3 and 4 toxicities reported so far, it has the potential to expand options for metastatic castration-resistant PC. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on low-molecular-weight PSMA ligands for both PET imaging and therapeutic approaches, with a focus on agents that have been clinically adopted.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  imaging; prostate cancer; prostate-specific membrane antigen; therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864615     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  61 in total

1.  68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in comparison with 18F-fluoride-PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Eva Dyrberg; Helle W Hendel; Tri Hien Viet Huynh; Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen; Vibeke B Løgager; Claus Madsen; Erik M Pedersen; Maria Pedersen; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  qPSMA: Semiautomatic Software for Whole-Body Tumor Burden Assessment in Prostate Cancer Using 68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT.

Authors:  Andrei Gafita; Marie Bieth; Markus Krönke; Giles Tetteh; Fernando Navarro; Hui Wang; Elisabeth Günther; Bjoern Menze; Wolfgang A Weber; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Looking for Drugs in All the Wrong Places: Use of GCPII Inhibitors Outside the Brain.

Authors:  James J Vornov; Diane Peters; Mike Nedelcovych; Kristen Hollinger; Rana Rais; Barbara S Slusher
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 4.  Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen PET of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.645

5.  Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis.

Authors:  Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Bernd Vollnberg; Ian Alberts; Alexandrine Bähler; Christos Sachpekidis; Lotte Dijkstra; Fabian Haupt; Silvan Boxler; Tobias Gross; Tim Holland-Letz; George Thalmann; Johannes Heverhagen; Axel Rominger; Kirsi Härmä; Martin H Maurer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  A Perspective on the Evolving Story of PSMA Biology, PSMA-Based Imaging, and Endoradiotherapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Denise S O'Keefe; Dean J Bacich; Steve S Huang; Warren D W Heston
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Deep neural network for automatic characterization of lesions on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Andrei Gafita; Bernd Vollnberg; Giles Tetteh; Fabian Haupt; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Bjoern Menze; Matthias Eiber; Axel Rominger; Kuangyu Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  A Prospective Comparison of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT and PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFBC PET/CT in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie A Harmon; Ethan Bergvall; Esther Mena; Joanna H Shih; Stephen Adler; Yolanda McKinney; Sherif Mehralivand; Deborah E Citrin; Anna Couvillon; Ravi A Madan; James L Gulley; Ronnie C Mease; Paula M Jacobs; Martin G Pomper; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; M Liza Lindenberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Radioligand Therapy of Prostate Cancer with a Long-Lasting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Targeting Agent 90Y-DOTA-EB-MCG.

Authors:  Zhantong Wang; Orit Jacobson; Rui Tian; Ronnie C Mease; Dale O Kiesewetter; Gang Niu; Martin G Pomper; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 10.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.