Literature DB >> 32396045

PSMA-targeted Radiotracers versus 18F Fluciclovine for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nelly Tan1, Udochukwu Oyoyo1, Niusha Bavadian1, Nicholas Ferguson1, Anudeep Mukkamala1, Jeremie Calais1, Matthew S Davenport1.   

Abstract

Background National guidelines endorse fluorine 18 (18F) fluciclovine PET/CT for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with biochemically recurrent PCa. The comparative performance between fluciclovine and gallium 68 or 18F prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, a newer examination, is unclear. Purpose To compare the detection of biochemical recurrence using fluciclovine versus PSMA-targeted radiotracers in patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 2 ng/mL. Materials and Methods With use of the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy, or PRISMA-DTA, guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases between 2012 and 2019 was performed. Studies of fluciclovine PET/CT or PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence were identified. PSA levels, clinical data, and reference standards were obtained when available. A random-effects model was applied to pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the prevalence of a positive examination, stratified according to PSA tier. Results Quantitative analysis included 482 patients (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 67-67 years) in six fluciclovine studies and 3217 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 67-70 years) in 38 PSMA studies. Pooled detection rates for PSMA and fluciclovine were 45% (95% CI: 38%, 52%) and 37% (95% CI: 25%, 49%), respectively, for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/mL (P = .46); 59% (95% CI: 52%, 66%) and 48% (95% CI: 34%, 61%) for a PSA level of 0.5-0.9 ng/mL (P = .19); and 80% (95% CI: 75%, 85%) and 62% (95% CI: 54%, 70%) for a PSA level of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL (P = .01). A reference standard was positive in 703 of 735 patients (96%) in the PSMA cohort and 247of 256 (97%) in the fluciclovine cohort. Conclusion Patient-level detection rates for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer were greater for prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiotracers than fluciclovine for prostate specific antigen levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32396045     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer and negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.

Authors:  Ruohua Chen; Yining Wang; Yiping Shi; Yinjie Zhu; Lian Xu; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weili Ma; Jiwei Mao; Jianfeng Yang; Ting Wang; Zhen Hua Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Divya Yadav; Hyunsoo Hwang; Wei Qiao; Rituraj Upadhyay; Brian F Chapin; Chad Tang; Ana Aparicio; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Stella K Kang; Homer A Macapinlac; Tharakeswara K Bathala; Devaki Shilpa Surasi
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-03

4.  How Accurately does PSMA Inhibitor 18F-DCFPyL-PET-CT Image Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Lawrence D True; Delphine L Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The Heterogeneous Metabolic Patterns of Ganglia in 68Ga-PSMA, 11C-choline, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yiping Shi; Jian Guo Wu; Lian Xu; Yinjie Zhu; Yining Wang; Gan Huang; Jianjun Liu; Ruohua Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian Leigh Alberts; Svenja Elizabeth Seide; Clemens Mingels; Karl Peter Bohn; Kuangyu Shi; Helle D Zacho; Axel Rominger; Ali Afshar-Oromieh
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Mars Shot for Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Molecularly Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Bonnie Clarke; Alexander Drzezga; Liza Lindenberg; Arman Rahmim; James Thackeray; Gary A Ulaner; Wolfgang Weber; Katherine Zukotynski; John Sunderland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 8.  The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasutaka Yamada; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Utility of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI for Staging Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Prostate Cancer and Evaluating Response to Initial Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Andrew M McDonald; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Kristin K Porter; Gagandeep Choudhary; Constantine Burgan; Pradeep Bhambhvani; Jeffrey W Nix; Desiree E Morgan; Yufeng Li; John V Thomas; Jonathan McConathy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 6.582

10.  The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rang Wang; Guohua Shen; Mingxing Huang; Rong Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.