Luigi Feletto1, Daniele Botticelli2, Karol Ali Apaza Alccayhuaman3, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago4, Mustafa Ezzeddin-Ayoub5, Regino Zaragozi-Alonso6, Jose Viña-Almunia7. 1. ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy. 2. Principal Research Scientist at ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy. 3. Department of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 4. Oral Surgery Unit, Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 5. Advanced Radiopharmaceutical Technician, Micro PET-CT Unit, Medical Central Investigation Unit (UCIM), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 6. Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, Oral Surgery Unit, Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 7. Oral Surgery Unit, Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, C/Gasco Oliag 1, 46021, Valencia, Spain. jose-a.vina@uv.es.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate using microCT and positron emission tomography (PET) analysis, the influence on bone healing of the placement of particulate autogenous bone in the antrostomy, and in the subjacent region after maxillary sinus elevation with xenograft. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sinus mucosa was elevated in sixteen male New Zealand rabbits and they were both grafted with a collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone. The antrostomy and the near subjacent region were filled with either the same xenograft (control site) or with particulate autogenous bone (test site) harvested from the tibia. The antrostomies were covered with collagen membranes. MicroCT (measured in Hounsfield Units) and microPET (kBq/cm3) using sodium fluoride infiltration (18F-NaF) were performed at the time of euthanasia that was performed after 1 and 8 weeks of healing, using 8 animals in each group. The Wilcoxon test was used for analysis. RESULTS: At the microCT analysis, after 1 and 8 weeks of healing, no statistically significant differences were found between groups. Bone increased and xenograft decreased significantly between the two periods of healing. At the microPET analysis, the percentage of bone increased significantly over time in both test and control groups and no significant differences were found between groups. CONCLUSION: The placement of autogenous bone in the antrostomy and the subjacent region after maxillary sinus elevation did not enhance bone formation compared with sites where only xenograft was used. Both microCT and microPET showed increase bone formation over time.
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate using microCT and positron emission tomography (PET) analysis, the influence on bone healing of the placement of particulate autogenous bone in the antrostomy, and in the subjacent region after maxillary sinus elevation with xenograft. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sinus mucosa was elevated in sixteen male New Zealand rabbits and they were both grafted with a collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone. The antrostomy and the near subjacent region were filled with either the same xenograft (control site) or with particulate autogenous bone (test site) harvested from the tibia. The antrostomies were covered with collagen membranes. MicroCT (measured in Hounsfield Units) and microPET (kBq/cm3) using sodium fluoride infiltration (18F-NaF) were performed at the time of euthanasia that was performed after 1 and 8 weeks of healing, using 8 animals in each group. The Wilcoxon test was used for analysis. RESULTS: At the microCT analysis, after 1 and 8 weeks of healing, no statistically significant differences were found between groups. Bone increased and xenograft decreased significantly between the two periods of healing. At the microPET analysis, the percentage of bone increased significantly over time in both test and control groups and no significant differences were found between groups. CONCLUSION: The placement of autogenous bone in the antrostomy and the subjacent region after maxillary sinus elevation did not enhance bone formation compared with sites where only xenograft was used. Both microCT and microPET showed increase bone formation over time.
Authors: Stephen S Wallace; Stuart J Froum; Sang-Choon Cho; Nicholas Elian; Diogo Monteiro; Byung Soo Kim; Dennis P Tarnow Journal: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Sarah Bastawrous; Puneet Bhargava; Fatemeh Behnia; David S W Djang; David R Haseley Journal: Radiographics Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Susanna Annibali; Diana Bellavia; Livia Ottolenghi; Andrea Cicconetti; Maria Paola Cristalli; Roberta Quaranta; Andrea Pilloni Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Margarida Figueiredo; Jose Henriques; Gabriela Martins; Fernando Guerra; Fernando Judas; Helena Figueiredo Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Giacomo Favero; Jose Viña-Almunia; Carmen Carda; José Javier Martín de Llano; Berta García-Mira; David Soto-Peñaloza; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Daniele Botticelli Journal: Int J Implant Dent Date: 2020-03-04