Literature DB >> 25208282

Newer PET application with an old tracer: role of 18F-NaF skeletal PET/CT in oncologic practice.

Sarah Bastawrous1, Puneet Bhargava, Fatemeh Behnia, David S W Djang, David R Haseley.   

Abstract

The skeleton is one of the most common sites for metastatic disease, particularly from breast and prostate cancer. Bone metastases are associated with considerable morbidity, and accurate imaging of the skeleton is important in determining the appropriate therapeutic plan. Sodium fluoride labeled with fluorine 18 (sodium fluoride F 18 [(18)F-NaF]) is a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical first introduced several decades ago for skeletal imaging. (18)F-NaF was approved for clinical use as a positron emission tomographic (PET) agent by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1972. The early use of this agent was limited, given the difficulties of imaging its high-energy photons on the available gamma cameras. For skeletal imaging, it was eventually replaced by technetium 99m ((99m)Tc)-labeled agents because of the technical limitations of (18)F-NaF. During the past several years, the widespread availability and implementation of hybrid PET and computed tomographic (CT) dual-modality systems (PET/CT) have encouraged a renewed interest in (18)F-NaF PET/CT for routine clinical use in bone imaging. Because current PET/CT systems offer high sensitivity and spatial resolution, the use of (18)F-NaF has been reevaluated for the detection of malignant and nonmalignant osseous disease. Growing evidence suggests that (18)F-NaF PET/CT provides increased sensitivity and specificity in the detection of bone metastases. Furthermore, the favorable pharmacokinetics of (18)F-NaF, combined with the superior imaging characteristics of PET/CT, supports the routine clinical use of (18)F-NaF PET/CT for oncologic imaging for skeletal metastases. In this article, a review of the indications, imaging appearances, and utility of (18)F-NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of skeletal disease is provided, with an emphasis on oncologic imaging. ©RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25208282     DOI: 10.1148/rg.345130061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  36 in total

1.  Quantitative imaging of bone-cartilage interactions in ACL-injured patients with PET-MRI.

Authors:  F Kogan; A P Fan; U Monu; A Iagaru; B A Hargreaves; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  18F-NaF PET/CT in Extensive Melorheostosis of the Axial and Appendicular Skeleton With Soft-Tissue Involvement.

Authors:  Georgios Z Papadakis; Smita Jha; Timothy Bhattacharyya; Corina Millo; Tsang-Wei Tu; Ulas Bagci; Kostas Marias; Apostolos H Karantanas; Nicholas J Patronas
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Distinct Clinical and Pathological Features of Melorheostosis Associated With Somatic MAP2K1 Mutations.

Authors:  Smita Jha; Nadja Fratzl-Zelman; Paul Roschger; Georgios Z Papadakis; Edward W Cowen; Heeseog Kang; Tanya J Lehky; Katharine Alter; Zuoming Deng; Aleksandra Ivovic; Lauren Flynn; James C Reynolds; Abhijit Dasgupta; Markku Miettinen; Eileen Lange; James Katz; Klaus Klaushofer; Joan C Marini; Richard M Siegel; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Gorham-Stout Disease.

Authors:  Georgios Z Papadakis; Corina Millo; Ulas Bagci; Jenny Blau; Michael T Collins
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 5.  Sclerotic bone lesions caused by non-infectious and non-neoplastic diseases: a review of the imaging and clinicopathologic findings.

Authors:  Vaibhav Gulati; Majid Chalian; Jaehyuck Yi; Uma Thakur; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Assessment of femoral neck bone metabolism using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Sylvia Rhodes; Alexandra Batzdorf; Olivia Sorci; Matthew Peng; Amanda Jankelovits; Julia Hornyak; Jongyun An; Peter B Noël; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Abass Alavi; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Quantitative analysis of 18F-NaF dynamic PET/CT cannot differentiate malignant from benign lesions in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Jens Hillengass; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Hoda Anwar; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 8.  Role of sodium fluoride PET imaging for identification of bony metastases in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  C Tanner Hughes; Jeffrey Wells Nix
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography and Plaque Calcification.

Authors:  Sina Tavakoli; Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 10.  Site specific measurements of bone formation using [18F] sodium fluoride PET/CT.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Tanuj Puri; Musib Siddique; Michelle L Frost; Amelia E B Moore; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.