| Literature DB >> 35478585 |
Xiaoxue Du1,2, Yafei Wang1,2, Xiaodong Zhang1,2, Guoxin Ma1,2, Yong Liu1,2, Bin Wang1,2, Hanping Mao1,2.
Abstract
Terahertz technology is receiving increasing attention for its use as an efficient non-destructive, non-contact and label-free optical method for qualitative and quantitative detection. The aim of this study was to develop a chemical analysis methodology based on terahertz time-domain spectra that could be used to detect plant growth regulators, such as glyphosine, naphthaleneacetic acid, daminozide and gibberellic acid. The THz fingerprint spectra of these four PGRs were located in the 0.3-1.8 THz, with the peaks of glyphosine at 0.32, 0.49, 0.74, 0.87, 0.96, and 1.49 THz; daminozide at 0.33, 0.39, 0.55, 0.67, and 1.17 THz; gibberellic acid at 0.46, 0.58, 0.92, and 1.38 THz and naphthaleneacetic acid at 0.43, 0.57, 0.73, and 0.90 THz. The results showed that these four plant growth regulators exhibited numerous distinct spectral features in frequency-dependent absorption spectra, which demonstrated the qualitative capacity of terahertz time-domain. The origin of the observed terahertz absorption peaks of these four plant growth regulators was determined through density functional theory calculations and analysis of absorption spectra. Discriminant analysis method was used to evaluate the classification trends of the four plant growth regulators based on their THz absorbance spectra. Generally, this study provides a reference for the rapid detection of plant growth regulators in fruits and vegetables by using terahertz spectroscopy technology. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35478585 PMCID: PMC9038130 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra05222e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Terahertz time-domain spectral imaging system.
Fig. 2Optimized geometrical structures of isolated-molecules using DFT calculations: (a) glyphosine, (b) naphthaleneacetic acid, (c) daminozide, (d) gibberellic acid.
Fig. 3Comparison of absorption spectrum of PGRs between experiment and Gaussian calculation, (a) glyphosine, (b) naphthaleneacetic acid, (c) daminozide and (d) gibberellic acid.
Assignment of the vibrational modes for PGRs in the frequency region 0.3–1.8 THza
| Samples | Vibrational frequency (THz) | Assignment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Calculation | ||
| Glyphosine | 0.32 | — | — |
| 0.49 | 0.48 | ρ(H7–O6–C25–H19) | |
| 0.74 | 0.72 | ω(O9–P8–O10) | |
| 0.87 | — | — | |
| 0.96 | 0.96 | ω(H23–O5–C26–O6) | |
| 1.19 | 1.20 | ω(O15–P12–O14–H16) | |
| 1.49 | 1.44 | ω(C3–P8–C11) | |
| Naphthaleneacetic acid | 0.42 | 0.48 | ω(C22–C1–O3–H4) |
| 0.55 | — | — | |
| 0.71 | 0.72 | ω(H23–C22–H24) | |
| 0.88 | — | — | |
| 1.04 | 0.96 | ρ(H12–C5), ρ(H21–C18) | |
| 1.19 | 1.2 | ω(C19–C22–H24) | |
| 1.36 | — | — | |
| Daminozide | 0.33 | — | — |
| 0.39 | — | — | |
| 0.55 | 0.46 | ω(O8–C7–N9–H10) | |
| 0.67 | 0.69 | ρ(H20–C6–H21), | |
| 0.92 | 0.92 | ω(H22–C5–C6–H21) | |
| 1.17 | 1.15 | ω(H22–C5–H23), | |
| Gibberellic acid | 0.46 | 0.46 | ρ(O12–C11–O13) |
| 0.58 | — | — | |
| 0.92 | 0.92 | ρ(O10–C17–O20), ω(H8–C7–H9) | |
| 1.38 | 1.38 | τ(O12–C11–O13), ω(H40–C41–H47) | |
ρ: rocking (in plane), ω: wagging (out of plane), τ: twisting.
Fig. 4Displacement vector representation of the vibrational modes of PGRs. (a) Displacement vector representation of the vibrational modes of glyphosine at 0.49 and 0.96 THz. (b) Displacement vector representation of the vibrational modes of naphthaleneacetic acid at 0.71 and 1.04 THz. (c) Displacement vector representation of the vibrational modes of daminozide at 0.67 and 1.17 THz. (d) Displacement vector representation of the vibrational modes of gibberellic acid at 0.96, 0.92 and 1.38 THz.
Fig. 5Terahertz time-domain spectra and terahertz reflective spectra. (a) Terahertz time-domain spectra. (b) Terahertz reflective spectra.
Fig. 6Variation of absorption coefficients of PGRs. (a) Variation of absorption coefficients of PGRs from 0.3 to 1.0 THz. (b) Variation of absorption coefficients of PGRs from 1.1 to 1.6 THz.
Fig. 7Score plot of PC1 vs. PC2 of a principle component analysis on THz spectra of four plant growth regulators (daminozide, glyphosine, gibberellic acid, naphthaleneacetic acid).
Fig. 8Classification of four plant growth regulators by using the discriminant analysis method. (a) Typical score chart. (b) Classification summary chart.