| Literature DB >> 35462549 |
Zhensheng Wang1,2, Chunyan Wei1, Yunchun Pan3, Zhihua Wang4, Xin Ji5, Qianqian Chen2, Lianhui Zhang1, Zenglei Wang6, Heng Wang7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax remains the predominant species at the China-Myanmar border, imposing a major challenge to the recent gains in regional malaria elimination. To closely supervise the emerging of drug resistance in this area, we surveyed the variations in genes potentially correlated with drug resistance in P. vivax parasite and the possible drug selection with time.Entities:
Keywords: Antimalarial drug; China–Myanmar border; Drug resistance; Molecular marker; Plasmodium vivax
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35462549 PMCID: PMC9036727 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-022-00964-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 10.485
General information of the enrolled cases
| General information | Case number (%) |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| 2008‒2010 | 13 (5.5) |
| 2012‒2015 | 31 (13.2) |
| 2016‒2017 | 191 (81.3) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 78 (33.2) |
| Female | 157 (66.8) |
| Residence | |
| Laiza sub-township | 80 (34.2) |
| Yingjiang county | 91 (38.7) |
| Longling county | 41 (17.6) |
| Tengchong county | 10 (4.3) |
| Nabang port | 13 (5.5) |
| Drug administration | |
| CQ (8 days) + Primaquine (8 days) | 137 (58.3) |
| CQ (3 days) + Primaquine (14 days) | 60 (25.5) |
| Compound naphthoquine tablet (single dosage) | 35 (14. 9) |
| ACTs | 1 (0.4) |
| NR | 2 (0.9) |
ACTs, Artemisinin-based combination therapies; CQ, chloroquine; NR, No records
Prevalence of point mutations during different time periods
| Mutationsa | Number of mutations (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008‒2010 | 2012‒2015 | 2016‒2017 | Total | |
| C49 | 1 (7.7) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.1) |
| F57 | 11 (84.6) | 18 (60.0) | 47 (32.6)*** | 76 (40.6) |
| S58 | 12 (92.3) | 21 (70.0) | 73 (50.7)** | 106 (56.7) |
| T61 | 11 (84.6) | 17 (56. 7) | 47 (32.6)*** | 75 (40.1) |
| H99 | 2 (15.4) | 10 (33.3) | 91 (63.2)*** | 103 (56.6) |
| S117 | 12 (92.3) | 19 (63.3) | 71 (49.3)** | 102 (56.0) |
| I173 | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.6) |
The difference in the mutations among three periods of time was calculated by Pearson’s Chi-squared test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001
aPoint mutations are shown in boldface. Pvdhfr, P. vivax dihydrofolate reductase gene; pvdhps, P. vivax dihydropteroate synthase gene; pvmdr1, P. vivax multidrug resistance 1 gene; pvcrt-o, P. vivax chloroquine resistance transporter-o gene
Prevalence of pvdhfr, pvdhps, pvmdr1, and pvcrt-o haplotypes
| Gene | Type | Haplotype | Number of haplotypes (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008‒2010 | 2012‒2015 | 2016‒2017 | Total | |||
| Wild type | 1 (7.7) | 4 (13.3) | 23 (16.0) | 28 (15.0) | ||
| Single mutant (a) | 58R | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.7) | 2 (0.5) | |
| Single mutant (b) | 99S | 0 (0) | 4 (13.3) | 48 (33.3)** | 52 (27.8) | |
| Single mutant (c) | 173F | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Double mutant | 57L/58R | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Double mutant | 58R/117N | 1 (7.7) | 3 (10.0) | 23 (16.0) | 27 (14.4) | |
| Triple mutant | 57L/58R/61M | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Quadruple mutant (a) | 57I/58R/61M/117T | 5 (38.5) | 9 (30.0) | 28 (19.4) | 42 (22.5) | |
| Quadruple mutant (b) | 57L/58R/61M/117T | 5(38.5) | 7 (23.3) | 18 (12.5)* | 30 (16.0) | |
| Quintuple mutant (a) | 49R/57I/58R/61M/117T | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Quintuple mutant (b) | 49R/57L/58R/61M/117T | 1 (7.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Wild type | 1 (7.7) | 1 (3.3) | 30 (16.3) | 32 (14.1) | ||
| Single mutant (a) | 383G | 4 (30.8) | 7 (23.3) | 63 (34.2) | 74 (32.6) | |
| Single mutant (b) | 553G | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.4) | |
| Single mutant (c) | 626A | 0 (0) | 3 (10.0) | 1 (0.5) | 4 (1.8) | |
| Single mutant (d) | 647S | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 31 (16.8) | 32 (14.1) | |
| Double mutant (a) | 382A/383G | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0)* | 2 (0.9) | |
| Double mutant (b) | 383G/553G | 6 (46.2) | 14 (46. 7) | 30 (16.3)*** | 50 (22.0) | |
| Double mutant (c) | 512E/647S | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.4) | |
| Double mutant (d) | 626A/633S | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (1.1) | 2 (0.9) | |
| Triple mutant (a) | 372S/626A/647S | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.4) | |
| Triple mutant (b) | 382A/383G/553G | 2 (15.4) | 1 (3.3) | 5 (2.7) | 8 (3.5) | |
| Triple mutant (c) | 383G/512E/553G | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (0.9) | |
| Quadruple mutant (a) | 382C/383G/512E/553G | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (4.9) | 9 (4.0) | |
| Quadruple mutant (b) | 383G/571Q/639E/640G | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (4.9) | 9 (4.0) | |
| Wild type | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Single mutant (a) | 958 M | 5 (38.5) | 12 (40.0) | 39 (20.6) | 56 (24.1) | |
| Double mutant (a) | 958 M/1076L | 4 (30.8) | 16 (53.3) | 143 (75.7)*** | 162 (69.8) | |
| Double mutant (b) | 958 M/997R | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 6 (3.2) | 7 (3.0) | |
| Triple mutant (a) | 958 M/976F/1076L | 4 (30.8) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (2.2) | |
| Triple mutant (b) | 958 M/997R/1076L | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.4) | |
| Wild type | 5 (41.7) | 18 (62.1) | 110 (69.6) | 133 (66.8) | ||
| Single mutant (a) | K10(in)a | 6 (50.0) | 10 (34.5) | 47 (29.8) | 63 (31.7) | |
| Single mutant (b) | K10(in)/57H | 0 (0) | 1 (3.5) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Single mutant (c) | K10(in)/19C | 1 (5.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Single mutant (d) | 2I/K10(in) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.5) | |
The difference in the major haplotypes among three periods of time was calculated by corrected Pearson’s Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test. * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
a(in) indicates K10 insertion. Pvdhfr, P. vivax dihydrofolate reductase gene; pvdhps, P. vivax dihydropteroate synthase gene; pvmdr1, P. vivax multidrug resistance 1 gene; pvcrt-o, P. vivax chloroquine resistance transporter-o gene
Fig. 1Geographical prevalence of pvdhfr haplotypes and tandem repeat variants. a The geographical distribution of pvdhfr haplotypes. b Amino-acid sequence alignment of three tandem repeat variants. Bold letters indicate the tandem repeat. c Frequency changes of the tandem repeat variants over time. d The geographical distribution of tandem repeat variants. The size of the pie represents the number of the isolates (n)
Fig. 2Geographical prevalence of pvdhps haplotypes and tandem repeat variants. a The geographical distribution of pvdhps haplotypes. b Amino-acid sequence alignment of three tandem repeat variants. c Frequency changes of tandem repeat variants over time. d The geographical distribution of tandem repeat variants. The size of the pie represents the number of the isolates (n)
Fig. 3Geographical prevalence of pvmdr1 haplotypes (a) and pvcrt-o haplotypes (b). The size of the pie represents the number of the isolates (n)