| Literature DB >> 35456736 |
Melisa Elsie Kasimin1, Suriyani Shamsuddin1, Arnold Marshall Molujin1, Mohd Khalizan Sabullah1, Jualang Azlan Gansau1, Roslina Jawan1.
Abstract
Food preservation is a method used to handle and treat food products to slow down food spoilage and subsequently reduce the risk of foodborne illness. Nowadays, the demand for natural preservatives over chemical preservatives in food is increasing due to the awareness of consuming healthy food products without the risk of harmful side effects. Thus, the research and development of preservation techniques, referred to as biopreservation, is growing rapidly. In biopreservation methods, microorganisms that are known as lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and their antimicrobial substances are used to extend shelf life and maintain the nutritional value of foods. Among the most studied LAB are from the genus Enterococcus, which produces a bacteriocin called enterocin. Bacteriocins are ribosomal-synthesized antimicrobial peptides that are capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogenic bacteria that cause spoilage in food. LAB is generally regarded as safe (GRAS) for human consumption. The current application of LAB, notably Enterococcus sp. in the biopreservation of meat and meat-based products was highlighted in this review. This report also includes information on the effects of enzymes, temperature, and pH on the stability of bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus sp. An extensive compilation of numerous industry procedures for preserving meat has also been emphasized, highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of each method.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial substances; commercial techniques; enterocin; food preservation; lactic acid bacteria; natural preservatives
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456736 PMCID: PMC9031415 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Chemical structure of enterocin.
Enterocin classification.
| Class | Sub-Class | Sub-Class/Characteristics | Example | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | Lantibotic enterocin | - | Cytolysine | [ |
| II | Class II-1: Consists of hydrophilic and cationic regions with a consensus sequence of YGNGV located at the end of N terminus and sulfide bridge formed by two cysteine residues at the extremity of N terminus | Sub-group 1: Possess the ABC transport system for the secretion of enterocin | Enterocin L50A, mundticin | [ |
| Sub-group 2: Bacteriocin production through pre-mature proteins | Enterocin P, Enterocin M, Enterocin B | |||
| Class II-2: The synthesis process occurs without leader peptides, devoid of consensus sequence as well as the secretion of the ABC transport system. | Sub-group 1: Composed of monomeric protein | Enterocin RJ-11, Enterocin Q, Enterocin EJ97 | ||
| Sub-group 2: Required in the formation of the heterodimeric complex | Enterocin L50, Enterocin MR10 | |||
| Class II-3 | Enterocin-like linear non-pediocin | Enterocin B, Durancin GL | ||
| IIIa | - | Cyclic peptide, large protein thermolabile | Enterocin As-48 | [ |
| IV | - | Consists of heat-labile peptides with a high molecular weight | Enterolysine A | [ |
Bacteriocin produced by lactic acid bacteria tested on raw meat.
| Lactic Acid Bacteria | Bacteriocin | Inhibitory Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterocin P | [ | ||
| Enterocin A, B, and P | The growth of listerial was completely inhibited from day 14 until 28. | [ | |
| The inhibition of | |||
|
| Enterocin AS-48 | There was no detection of | [ |
|
| Paracin C | The growth of pathogenic bacteria was inhibited, and the color of the meat was retained until day 15. | [ |
|
| Plantaricin EF, W, JK and S | The growth of both spoilage bacteria was inhibited by | [ |
|
| Sakacin G | The application of | [ |
|
| Bacteriocins | The formation of the inhibition zone after the treatment of bacteriocin demonstrated the growth inhibition of | [ |
| Pediocin | Pediocin and pediocin-like bacteriocins exerted a broad spectrum of activity against | [ |
The types of enterocin produced by Enterococcus sp. used in raw meat products.
| Producer Strain | Types of Enterocin | Product | Additional Technique Used | Targeted Pathogenic Bacteria | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Enterocin As-48 | Fermented sausage | Mixed with bacteriocin/chemical preservatives |
| [ |
|
| Enterocin L50A-like bacteriocin & L50B (Dur 152A) | Ham | Semi-purified bacteriocin/anti-listerial protection |
| [ |
|
| Enterocin A and B | Fermented dried sausage, minced pork, and ham | Applied on the surface of meat/alginate film/high hydrostatic pressure | [ | |
|
| Enterocin 416kk1 | Cacciatore (Italian sausage) | Starter culture/low-density polyethylene film |
| [ |
|
| Mundticin | Fermented fish and seafood, sausage | Starter culture/chitosan |
| [ |
Activity of bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus sp. against enzymes, temperature, and pH.
| Strain | Bacteriocin | Stability | References | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzyme | Temperature (°C/min) | pH | |||||||||||||||
|
| Trypsin | Chymotrypsin | Lipase | Catalase | 65 °C/30 min | 80 °C/30 min | 100 °C/30 min | 121 °C/15 min | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | |||
|
| Enterocin As-48 | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | [ |
|
| Enterocin A and B | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | [ |
|
| Enterocin L50A- like bacteriocin and L50B, Durancin GL | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | − | − | [ |
|
| Mudticin | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | [ |
|
| Enterocin A, B, and P | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | [ |
Various methods used in preserving meat.
| Category | Method | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Biopreservation | The application of bacteriocin produced by lactic acid bacteria with a specific antimicrobial activity | Helps in extending the shelf life of the product and subsequently, improves the unique taste and texture of the product | Sensitive to food enzyme, low level of solubility, and easy to be absorbed | [ |
| Chemical preservation | The process of controlling spoilage microorganisms using antimicrobial compounds, such as chlorides, nitrites, sulfides, and organic acid | Adds flavor and extends the shelf life of the product | Causes change in color, bad odor, and long-term harmful effects on human health | [ | |
|
| Chilling | Reducing the microbial reproduction at temperatures below its optimal temperature for growth by 2–5 °C. | Ensures the cleanliness and safety of the meat, prolongs the shelf life, and retains the nutritional quality | An increase in air velocity or a decrease in temperature affects the cooling time, as well as the slow heat-release throughout the meat tissues | [ |
| Super Chilling | The process of freezing the water content in a particular product at 1–2 °C. | Prevents the growth of microbes, reduces labor cost, and maintains the product weight | Complex calculations are required to determine effective heat transfer as well as temperature control | [ | |
| Freezing | The temperature of −55 °C is the ideal storage condition to freeze the product to ensure that the product quality is maintained | Helps in inhibiting microbial growth and stops the enzyme activity | Deformation of product occurs due to the cryogenic process, affecting the commercialization process | [ | |
|
| Vacuum packaging | The use of packaging for raw meat includes the use of air-permeable packaging, low oxygen vacuum, low MAP oxygen with anoxic gas, and high MAP oxygen | This process can prevent the product from being contaminated and reduced in weight, increase the tenderness of the meat, and maintain the color of oxymyoglobin in meat | The active compound is unstable during the process of spraying the packaging material and the mass is too small to be transferred to the product | [ |
| Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) | |||||
| Active packaging | |||||
|
| Ionizing radiation | Radiation (gamma, infrared, UV) is applied to the product, causing the fragmentation of DNA molecules in the microbes | Effective in inactivating the growth of bacteria on the product and does not change chemically | Discoloration of meat may occur | [ |
| High hydrostatic pressure | This process is non-thermal, used to deactivate microbes and reduce the chemical reaction in food using high-pressure technology at 100 MPa (986.9 atm/1019.7 kgf/cm2). | Eliminates spoilage bacteria without changing the color, taste, texture, and moisture of the product and increase the shelf life as well as the tenderness of the meat | Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affect the pressure resistance | [ |
Comparison of preservation method by biopreservation and commercial techniques.
| Preservation Technique | Biopreservation | Commercial Techniques |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Low in cost as there is no need for advanced equipment | High in cost due to the use of advanced technology and skilled manpower |
| Effectiveness | More effective as it does not affect the intrinsic properties of the product | Less effective as it affects the intrinsic properties of the product |
| Range of control of food pathogens | More efficient against food pathogen of Gram-positive than Gram-negative | Less efficient against food pathogen of Gram-positive than Gram-negative |
| Type of product/foods | Limited application to dairy products, meat, and vegetables | Wide application for dairy products, meat, vegetables and fruits, fresh fruit juices, vegetable purees, and jams |
| Method/materials used | Bacteriocin from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) | High hydrostatic pressure, ionizing radiation, vacuum and active packaging, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), and refrigeration. |