Literature DB >> 35449797

Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI.

Jess D Tate1, Wilson Good2, Nejib Zemzemi3, Machteld Boonstra4, Peter van Dam4, Dana H Brooks5, Akil Narayan1, Rob S MacLeod1.   

Abstract

Despite advances in many of the techniques used in Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI), uncertainty remains insufficiently quantified for many aspects of the pipeline. The effect of geometric uncertainty, particularly due to segmentation variability, may be the least explored to date. We use statistical shape modeling and uncertainty quantification (UQ) to compute the effect of segmentation variability on ECGI solutions. The shape model was made with Shapeworks from nine segmentations of the same patient and incorporated into an ECGI pipeline. We computed uncertainty of the pericardial potentials and local activation times (LATs) using polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) implemented in UncertainSCI. Uncertainty in pericardial potentials from segmentation variation mirrored areas of high variability in the shape model, near the base of the heart and the right ventricular outflow tract, and that ECGI was less sensitive to uncertainty in the posterior region of the heart. Subsequently LAT calculations could vary dramatically due to segmentation variability, with a standard deviation as high as 126ms, yet mainly in regions with low conduction velocity. Our shape modeling and UQ pipeline presented possible uncertainty in ECGI due to segmentation variability and can be used by researchers to reduce said uncertainty or mitigate its effects. The demonstrated use of statistical shape modeling and UQ can also be extended to other types of modeling pipelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocardiographic Imaging; Shape Analysis; Uncertainty Quantification

Year:  2021        PMID: 35449797      PMCID: PMC9019843          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Imaging Model Heart


  14 in total

1.  Stochastic Markovian modeling of electrophysiology of ion channels: reconstruction of standard deviations in macroscopic currents.

Authors:  Sarah E Geneser; Robert M Kirby; Dongbin Xiu; Frank B Sachse
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  The forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography.

Authors:  R M Gulrajani
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

3.  Effect of Segmentation Variation on ECG Imaging.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Nejib Zemzemi; Wilson W Good; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-09

4.  Relating epicardial to body surface potential distributions by means of transfer coefficients based on geometry measurements.

Authors:  R C Barr; M Ramsey; M S Spach
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Spatiotemporal estimation of activation times of fractionated ECGs on complex heart surfaces.

Authors:  Burak Erem; Dana H Brooks; Peter M van Dam; Jeroen G Stinstra; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

6.  A toolkit for forward/inverse problems in electrocardiography within the SCIRun problem solving environment.

Authors:  Brett M Burton; Jess D Tate; Burak Erem; Darrell J Swenson; Dafang F Wang; Michael Steffen; Dana H Brooks; Peter M van Dam; Rob S Macleod
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

7.  Space-time shape uncertainties in the forward and inverse problem of electrocardiography.

Authors:  Lia Gander; Rolf Krause; Michael Multerer; Simone Pezzuto
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.648

8.  Experimental Data and Geometric Analysis Repository-EDGAR.

Authors:  Kedar Aras; Wilson Good; Jess Tate; Brett Burton; Dana Brooks; Jaume Coll-Font; Olaf Doessel; Walther Schulze; Danila Potyagaylo; Linwei Wang; Peter van Dam; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.

Authors:  Kyle M Burk; Akil Narayan; Joseph A Orr
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Overcoming Barriers to Quantification and Comparison of Electrocardiographic Imaging Methods: A Community-Based Approach.

Authors:  Sandesh Ghimire; Jwala Dhamala; Jaume Coll-Font; Jess D Tate; Maria S Guillem; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod; Linwei Wang
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-04-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Body Surface Potential Mapping: Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Jake Bergquist; Lindsay Rupp; Brian Zenger; James Brundage; Anna Busatto; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Hearts (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-05

2.  A Cardiac Shape Model for Segmentation Uncertainty Quantification.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Shireen Elhabian; Nejib Zemzemi; Wilson W Good; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2021-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.