Literature DB >> 29930953

Overcoming Barriers to Quantification and Comparison of Electrocardiographic Imaging Methods: A Community-Based Approach.

Sandesh Ghimire1, Jwala Dhamala1, Jaume Coll-Font2, Jess D Tate3, Maria S Guillem4, Dana H Brooks2, Rob S MacLeod3, Linwei Wang1.   

Abstract

There has been a recent upsurge in the development of electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) methods, along with a significant increase in clinical application. To better assess the state-of-the-art, enable reliable progress, and facilitate clinical adoption, it is important to be able to compare results in a comprehensive manner, scientifically and clinically. However, studies vary in modeling choices, computational methods, validation mechanisms and metrics, and clinical applications, making unified evaluation and comparison of ECGI a critical challenge. This paper describes initial results of a project to address this challenge via a community-based approach organized by the Consortium for Electrocardiographic Imaging (CEI). We detail different aspects of this collective effort including a data sharing repository, a platform for comparison of different algorithms and modeling approaches on the same datasets, several active workgroups and progress made along these directions. We also summarize the results from groups participating in this collaboration and contributing solutions by applying their methods to the same dataset for comparison.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29930953      PMCID: PMC6007992          DOI: 10.22489/CinC.2017.370-289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)        ISSN: 2325-887X


  4 in total

1.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.

Authors:  Simon K Warfield; Kelly H Zou; William M Wells
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The Consortium for Electrocardiographic Imaging.

Authors:  Jaume Coll-Font; Jwala Dhamala; Danila Potyagaylo; Walther Hw Schulze; Jess D Tate; Maria S Guillem; Peter van Dam; Olaf Dossel; Dana H Brooks; Rob S Macleod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2017-03-02

3.  Experimental Data and Geometric Analysis Repository-EDGAR.

Authors:  Kedar Aras; Wilson Good; Jess Tate; Brett Burton; Dana Brooks; Jaume Coll-Font; Olaf Doessel; Walther Schulze; Danila Potyagaylo; Linwei Wang; Peter van Dam; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Inverse solution mapping of epicardial potentials: quantitative comparison with epicardial contact mapping.

Authors:  John L Sapp; Fady Dawoud; John C Clements; B Milan Horácek
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-24
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Segmentation Variation on ECG Imaging.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Nejib Zemzemi; Wilson W Good; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-09

2.  A Cardiac Shape Model for Segmentation Uncertainty Quantification.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Shireen Elhabian; Nejib Zemzemi; Wilson W Good; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2021-09

3.  Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Wilson Good; Nejib Zemzemi; Machteld Boonstra; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Akil Narayan; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Funct Imaging Model Heart       Date:  2021-06-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.