Literature DB >> 35479610

A Cardiac Shape Model for Segmentation Uncertainty Quantification.

Jess D Tate1, Shireen Elhabian1, Nejib Zemzemi2, Wilson W Good3, Peter van Dam4, Dana H Brooks5, Rob S MacLeod1.   

Abstract

Segmentation of cardiac images is a variable component of many patient specific computational pipelines, yet its impact on simulated results are still not fully understood. A hurdle to to exploring the impact of the segmentation variability is the technical challenge of building a statistical shape model of the ventricles. In this study, we improved open our previous shape analysis by creating a unified shape model including both the epicardium and endocardium. We tested four techniques within ShapeWorks to generate a ventricular shape model: standard, multidomain, hybrid multidomain, and geodesic distance. The multidomain and hybrid multidomain generated a shape model using all eleven segmentations, and the geodesic distance method generated a shape model using a subset of four segmentations. Each of the shape models captured spatially dependent characteristics of the segmentation variability, including wall thickness, annular diameter, and basal truncation. While each of the three methods have benefits, the hybrid multidomain approach provided the most accurate shape model with fewest points and may be most useful in a majority of applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35479610      PMCID: PMC9039803          DOI: 10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)        ISSN: 2325-887X


  8 in total

1.  Computational tools for modeling electrical activity in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Edward J Vigmond; Matt Hughes; G Plank; L Joshua Leon
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Validating defibrillation simulation in a human-shaped phantom.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Thomas A Pilcher; Kedar K Aras; Brett M Burton; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Effect of Segmentation Variation on ECG Imaging.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Nejib Zemzemi; Wilson W Good; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-09

4.  Relating epicardial to body surface potential distributions by means of transfer coefficients based on geometry measurements.

Authors:  R C Barr; M Ramsey; M S Spach
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Segmentation Variability in ECGI.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Wilson Good; Nejib Zemzemi; Machteld Boonstra; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Akil Narayan; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Funct Imaging Model Heart       Date:  2021-06-18

6.  Experimental Data and Geometric Analysis Repository-EDGAR.

Authors:  Kedar Aras; Wilson Good; Jess Tate; Brett Burton; Dana Brooks; Jaume Coll-Font; Olaf Doessel; Walther Schulze; Danila Potyagaylo; Linwei Wang; Peter van Dam; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  Inverse solution mapping of epicardial potentials: quantitative comparison with epicardial contact mapping.

Authors:  John L Sapp; Fady Dawoud; John C Clements; B Milan Horácek
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-24

8.  Overcoming Barriers to Quantification and Comparison of Electrocardiographic Imaging Methods: A Community-Based Approach.

Authors:  Sandesh Ghimire; Jwala Dhamala; Jaume Coll-Font; Jess D Tate; Maria S Guillem; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod; Linwei Wang
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-04-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.