| Literature DB >> 35443740 |
J Horn1, D E Mayer2, S Chen3, E A Mayer4.
Abstract
There is emerging evidence that diet has a major modulatory influence on brain-gut-microbiome (BGM) interactions with important implications for brain health, and for several brain disorders. The BGM system is made up of neuroendocrine, neural, and immune communication channels which establish a network of bidirectional interactions between the brain, the gut and its microbiome. Diet not only plays a crucial role in shaping the gut microbiome, but it can modulate structure and function of the brain through these communication channels. In this review, we summarize the evidence available from preclinical and clinical studies on the influence of dietary habits and interventions on a selected group of psychiatric and neurologic disorders including depression, cognitive decline, Parkinson's disease, autism spectrum disorder and epilepsy. We will particularly address the role of diet-induced microbiome changes which have been implicated in these effects, and some of which are shared between different brain disorders. While the majority of these findings have been demonstrated in preclinical and in cross-sectional, epidemiological studies, to date there is insufficient evidence from mechanistic human studies to make conclusions about causality between a specific diet and microbially mediated brain function. Many of the dietary benefits on microbiome and brain health have been attributed to anti-inflammatory effects mediated by the microbial metabolites of dietary fiber and polyphenols. The new attention given to dietary factors in brain disorders has the potential to improve treatment outcomes with currently available pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35443740 PMCID: PMC9021202 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-01922-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 7.989
Evidence for the effect of dietary interventions on brain disorders.
| Disorder | Dietary intervention therapies |
|---|---|
| Epidemiological, interventional studies, and meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that intervention with a largely plant-based diet can reduce depressive symptoms compared to control conditions (Jacka et al., 2017; Parletta et al., 2019; Sanchez-Villegas et al., 2013). A large population-based study found a positive correlation between | |
| Meta-analysis of 11 RCTs from 2270 individuals showed no overall effect of dietary interventions on anxiety compared with control conditions (g = 0.100, 95% CI = − 0.036 to 0.235, p = .148, Q = 18.5, I2 = 46.1). As with depression outcomes, some studies using mostly (>75%) female participants observed significant positive effects on anxiety from dietary interventions ( | |
| The MIND (Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) diet consisting of higher consumption of berries and green leafy vegetables than the traditional Mediterranean diet resulted in a significantly lower risk for parkinsonism as well as a slower rate of PD symptom progression relative to controls in a study with 706 participants of an age range between 59 and 97. The group on a Mediterranean diet showed a significant reduction in parkinsonism progression when compared to the control group (Agarwal et al., 2018). | |
| Early-stage clinical studies show positive causal evidence for a ketogenic diet to improve cognitive function in those with AD despite the heterogeneity of interventional dietary studies. However, there is a paucity of evidence supporting an effect of a ketogenic diet on the prevention of AD development, an area of potential future research (Krikorian et al., 2012; Henderson et al., 2009, Ota et al., 2019; Reger et al., 2004; Taylor et al., 2018; Neth et al., 2020; Morrison et al., 2020; Fortier et al., 2019). The NUAGE dietary intervention trial showed that adherence to a Mediterranean diet was associated with increased abundance of butyrate producing taxa, which were negatively associated with inflammatory markers and positively associated with enhanced cognition (Ghosh et al., 2019). Supplementation with probiotics for 12 weeks induced a significant improvement in Mini- Mental State Examination score (Akbari et al., 2016). | |
| Various small, low quality dietary intervention studies have shown improvement in several domains compared to control groups, such as communication, social interaction, inattention, and hyperactivity (Cade et al., 2000; Knivsberg et al., 2002; Elder et al., 2006; Whiteley et al., 2010; Adams et al., 2018; Grimaldi et al., 2018). Metabolic and endocrine pathways have been observed to be different in ASD individuals compared to healthy controls (Needham et al., 2021; Emond et al., 2013). No strong causal evidence for diet-induced therapeutic microbiome changes. MTT was associated with a significant sustained decrease in GI symptoms and ASD symptoms, and favorable changes in the abundance of certain beneficial bacterial taxa (Kang et al., 2017; Kang et al., 2019). | |
| Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs found weak positive evidence of seizure reduction of the dietary intervention groups relative to the control groups (McGill et al., 2018). A case-control study demonstrated a 50% reduction in seizures in children with DRE after one week of being on the ketogenic diet, associated with decreased levels of several microbial taxa (Xie et al., 2017). Another ketogenic dietary intervention study showed no significant change in alpha diversity but diminished relative abundance of the butyrate producing taxa | |
| High adherence to a Mediterranean diet in 11.1% of 1472 subjects at high risk for binge eating disorder was associated with decreased development of the disorder (Bertoli et al., 2015). A study with 11,800 women with either anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa showed evidence for a potential inverse association between a Mediterranean dietary pattern and both eating disorders (Leone et al., 2018). Significant differences in the relative abundance of certain gut microbiota have been observed in anorexia nervosa (Kleiman et al., 2015; Morita et al., 2015). | |
| In a study with 100 children randomly assigned to either the dietary or the control group, the ADHD rating scale score between baseline and the first phase of the dietary intervention was significantly lower in the group following a restricted elimination diet compared to the control group (Pelsser et al., 2017).The beta diversity of the gut microbiome of ADHD participants was different than in the control group, even though the changes of individual bacterial taxa were different (Aarts et al., 2017; Prehn-Kristenen et al., 2018). |
Fig. 1The influence of food on the brain gut microbiome system.
The brain connectome, gut connectome and microbiome make up the 3 hubs in the larger BGM network. All hubs are linked by bidirectional connections with multiple feedback loops generating a non-linear system. Different components of food influence the brain, the gut and the gut microbiome via different communication channels. Dietary components can influence the gut directly and reach the brain after absorption in the small intestine. In addition, diet can influence gut microbial composition and diversity, and after microbial metabolism can modulate the gut connectome. Some of the microbial derived molecules are absorbed and reach the brain via the systemic circulation and/or the vagus nerve (see Fig. 2) Similarly, the brain can modulate the microbiome directly through the effect of neuroactive substances released into the gut lumen affecting gene expression and behavior of microbes, or indirectly via alterations of the gut microbial environment. Modified with permission from Martin et al., 2018.
Fig. 2Gut microbes generate neuroactive metabolites from tryptophan.
The essential amino acid Tryptophan is the precursor for a number of neuroactive signaling molecules including serotonin, kynurenine and indoles. Whereas microbes only play a modulatory role in the generation of serotonin and kynurenine, the synthesis of indoles is fully dependent on gut microbial metabolism. The relative abundance of the 3 metabolites is dependent on tryptophan intake, on the relative abundance of involved microbial taxa and on stress induced input from the autonomic nervous system. Modified with permission from Martin et al., 2018.
Fig. 3Four sources for gut microbial signaling molecules.
Gut microbial signaling molecules are derived from at least 4 different sources: Diet-derived, microbe-derived, host-derived and newly synthesized molecules. Chemical transformation of these molecules results in a vast number of signaling molecules which can influence not only cells in the gut (immune, nerve, endocrine cells), but following dissemination throughout the body are able to modulate all organs, including the brain. Certain diet-derived microbial metabolites have neuroactive effects on the central and autonomic nervous system, while microbial cell wall components can activate the immune system by interacting with TLRs. Some microbial metabolites (in particular the SCFA butyrate) exert anti-inflammatory effects. Modified with permission from Needham et al., 2020.
Challenges in Nutritional Psychiatry.
| Challenges |
|---|
| Poor translatability of preclinical findings into human psychiatric diseases due to heterogeneity of human study populations, confounding environmental factors and significant interspecies differences in brain structure and function. |
| Paucity of high quality RCT showing diet-induced normalization of disease-associated dysbiosis causally related to clinical improvements. |
| Detailed and standardized characterization of the gut microbiome down to the strain level, and functional characterization using shotgun metagenomics, meta |
| Methodological limitations in assessing dietary habits using questionnaires and interviews |
| Implementation of and adherence to a standardized diet over long periods of time has been challenging. |
Future directions in Nutritional Psychiatry.
| Clinical implications/future directions |
|---|
| Until an objective’s therapeutic benefits of specific dietary interventions have clearly been established, effective treatments are limited to the general recommendation of a healthy, largely plant-based diet with high variety of fruit and vegetables, or a ketogenic diet in some instances. |
| Results from high quality RCTs demonstrating benefits beyond adherence to a largely plant based (“microbiome-friendly”) diet by the intake of supplementary pre-, pro- or postbiotics are currently not available. |
| Potential therapeutic benefits of fecal microbial transplants in brain disorders, mimicking such effects previously reported in animal models, and in human C difficile colitis has generally not been successful, with the exception of an uncontrolled study in ASD (Kang et al., 2017; Kang et al; 2019). Confirmation of these findings in an RCT is essential before recommending in as an effective treatment for ASD. Reported studies about therapeutic benefits of fecal microbial transfer in patient populations for other psychiatric conditions have recently been reviewed with mixed results (Chinna Meyyappan et al., 2020). |