| Literature DB >> 35442080 |
Stephan Brinkmann1, Michael Kurz2, Maria A Patras1, Christoph Hartwig1, Michael Marner1, Benedikt Leis1, André Billion1, Yolanda Kleiner1, Armin Bauer2, Luigi Toti2, Christoph Pöverlein2, Peter E Hammann3, Andreas Vilcinskas1,4, Jens Glaeser1,3, Marius Spohn1, Till F Schäberle1,4.
Abstract
With progress in genome sequencing and data sharing, 1,000s of bacterial genomes are publicly available. Genome mining-using bioinformatics tools in terms of biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) identification, analysis, and rating-has become a key technology to explore the capabilities for natural product (NP) biosynthesis. Comprehensively, analyzing the genetic potential of the phylum Bacteroidetes revealed Chitinophaga as the most talented genus in terms of BGC abundance and diversity. Guided by the computational predictions, we conducted a metabolomics and bioactivity driven NP discovery program on 25 Chitinophaga strains. High numbers of strain-specific metabolite buckets confirmed the upfront predicted biosynthetic potential and revealed a tremendous uncharted chemical space. Mining this data set, we isolated the new iron chelating nonribosomally synthesized cyclic tetradeca- and pentadecalipodepsipeptide antibiotics chitinopeptins with activity against Candida, produced by C. eiseniae DSM 22224 and C. flava KCTC 62435, respectively. IMPORTANCE The development of pipelines for anti-infectives to be applied in plant, animal, and human health management are dried up. However, the resistance development against compounds in use calls for new lead structures. To fill this gap and to enhance the probability of success for the discovery of new bioactive natural products, microbial taxa currently underinvestigated must be mined. This study investigates the potential within the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes. A combination of omics-technologies revealed taxonomical hot spots for specialized metabolites. Genome- and metabolome-based analyses showed that the phylum covers a new chemical space compared with classic natural product producers. Members of the Bacteroidetes may thus present a promising bioresource for future screening and isolation campaigns.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteroidetes; NRPS; antifungal; genomics; metabolomics; natural products
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35442080 PMCID: PMC9248904 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02479-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Bioinformatics analysis of 600 genomes of the phylum Bacteroidetes points toward high biosynthetic genetic potential of the Chitinophagia class. (A) Consensus tree based on maximum-likelihood method (RAxML model v8 [108], GTR GAMMA with 1,000 bootstraps) of 600 16S rRNA gene sequences color coded on class level. For each strain the genome size and biosynthetic gene cluster amount and types are depicted. Tree is annotated using iTOL v4 (110). (B) Correlation of the total gene cluster amount with the genome size of each stain. (C) Analysis of the BGC types in the individual classes. BGC types: NRPS, nonribosomal peptide; PKS, polyketide; hybrid, cluster containing more than one BGC type; and other, remaining BGC types not separately listed. (D) Detailed look onto the most essential BGC types responsible for the production of bioactive NPs. Partial BGCs on contigs <10 kb of WGS projects are not included in all graphs.
FIG 2BiG-SCAPE (26) analysis of the phylum Bacteroidetes highlights a giant uncovered genetic potential. (A) A global network of all depicted gene cluster families with a cutoff of 0.6. Known ones are marked, named and are identified by known biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) deposited at MIBiG (all known and deposited Bacteroidetes BGCs are found). (B) Same BGCs sorted by taxonomy. BiG-SCAPE BGC classes: NRPS, nonribosomal peptide; PKS, polyketide; and RiPPs, ribosomally synthesized and posttranslational modified peptides. Singeltons (unique BGCs without any connection) are not shown. Visualization and manipulation by Cytoscape v3.4.0 (113).
FIG 3Taxonomical arrayed chemotype-barcoding matrix reveals an uncharted chemical space within the genus Chitinophaga. (A) The tree is based on a Clustal W alignment (111) of available 16S rRNA gene sequences of 25 Chitinophaga strains available for cultivation. The tree was calculated using MEGA v7.0.26 with the maximum-likelihood method and GTR-Gamma model (112). Percentage on the tree branches indicate values of 1,000 bootstrap replicates with a bootstrap support of more than 50%. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The bucketing process is depicted as a chemotype-barcode matrix and color coded by the condition each individual bucket was present. (B) Bar blot of the unique “metabolite” buckets of each strain. (C) Bar blot depicting the occurrence of “metabolite” buckets in the data sets.
FIG 4Chemical structures of the chitinopeptins A–D. Compounds 1 and 2 are produced by C. eiseniae DSM 22224, compounds 3 to 6 by C. flava KCTC 62435.
FIG 5Biosynthetic gene clusters responsible for the production of chitinopeptin A to Dand further derivatives. (A) BGCs of strains C. eiseniae, C. flava, C. oryziterrae, and C. niastensis with matching amino acid sequence and additional biosynthetic genes responsible for the hydroxylation of Asp, Phe, and Ile or the in cooperation of 2,3-diaminopropionic acid. Identity was calculated with a standard MAFFT alignment (107). (B) Gene cluster family of this iron chelating cyclic lipodepsipeptides. AA, amino acids; NmVal, N-Me-Val; Hya, β-hydroxyaspartic acid; C, condensation domain; A, adenylation domain; MT, nitrogen methyltransferase; T, peptidyl-carrier protein domain; E, epimerization domain; TE, thioesterase domain; CAL, co-enzyme A ligase domain; ACP, acyl-carrier protein domain; KS, ketosynthase domain; AT, acyltransferase domain.