| Literature DB >> 35440791 |
Ugur Parlatan1, Seyma Parlatan2, Kubra Sen3, Ibrahim Kecoglu3, Mustafa Ozer Ulukan4, Atalay Karakaya4, Korhan Erkanli4, Halil Turkoglu4, Murat Ugurlucan4, Mehmet Burcin Unlu3,5, Bukem Tanoren6.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is diagnosed with the electrocardiogram, which is the gold standard in clinics. However, sufficient arrhythmia monitoring takes a long time, and many of the tests are made in only a few seconds, which can lead arrhythmia to be missed. Here, we propose a combined method to detect the effects of AF on atrial tissue. We characterize tissues obtained from patients with or without AF by scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) and by Raman spectroscopy (RS) to construct a mechano-chemical profile. We classify the Raman spectral measurements of the tissue samples with an unsupervised clustering method, k-means and compare their chemical properties. Besides, we utilize scanning acoustic microscopy to compare and determine differences in acoustic impedance maps of the groups. We compared the clinical outcomes with our findings using a neural network classification for Raman measurements and ANOVA for SAM measurements. Consequently, we show that the stiffness profiles of the tissues, corresponding to the patients with chronic AF, without AF or who experienced postoperative AF, are in agreement with the lipid-collagen profiles obtained by the Raman spectral characterization.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35440791 PMCID: PMC9018680 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10380-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Experimental setups for (a) Raman spectroscopy and (b) scanning acoustic microscopy.
Figure 2Raman spectroscopy-based classification of the measured tissue samples. (a) Comparison of group means. (b) PC loadings of the spectral distribution of the first three PCs whose TVEs are about 76%. We used these PCs in the k-means analysis. (c) Determination of group indices by using principal component analysis (PCA). PC1 (with total variance explained (TVE) of 47%) vs. PC2 (TVE of 23%) plot shows the Euclidean distance between the PC scores, which were further used in the k-means analysis for the determination of group identities. (d) Chemical comparison of PC loadings by means of their responses at particular band positions. Variations of peak positions at 1040, 1295 and 1657 (proline, fatty acids, and Amide I) were investigated. (e) Raman spectrum of Stearic Acid (Provided by FDM Raman organics library). (f) Raman spectrum of Proline measured in our lab.
Figure 3Differences in Raman shifts found by BCA. The box plot comparison for the peak locations located at (a) 817 cm-1, (b) 853 cm-1, (c) 938 cm-1, (d) 1060 cm-1, (e) 1120 cm-1, (f) 1438 cm-1 are displayed.
Significant Raman bands among calculated band component analysis and their tentative assignments.
| Raman shift (cm-1) | Normalized Raman intensity (a.u.) *103 | Tentative assignments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group1 | Group2 | Group3 | ||
| 817 | 9.2 ± 3.2 | 2.6 ± 5.3 | 7.2 ± 3.3 | |
| 853 | 9.6 ± 4.7 | 3.6 ± 6.3 | 6.7 ± 4.8 | Proline of collagen[ |
| 938 | 14.6 ± 5.2 | 1.7 ± 4.0 | 8.5 ± 3.4 | C-H out-of-plane vibration (Collagen type I or tyrosine), |
| 1060 | 25.9 ± 6.7 | 70.9.1 ± 15.1 | 39.8 ± 8.3 | |
| 1120 | 6.9 ± 0.4 | 39.4 ± 1.4 | 17.9 ± 1.4 | |
| 1438 | 10.2 ± 8.0 | 59.1 ± 31.4 | 23.3 ± 13.4 | HCC(out of plane), Proline[ |
| 1623 | 17.4 ± 1.4 | 18.7 ± 1.0 | 15.1 ± 1.4 | Amide I |
| 1676 | 6.8 ± 2.7 | 9.5 ± 3.1 | 8.7 ± 3.1 | Amide I |
Figure 4Acoustic impedance maps of tissues of patients of (a) Group 1, (b) Group 2, and (c) Group 3. (d) Average acoustic impedance values, with standard deviations, of 3 groups.
Figure 5(a) Confusion table for the unsupervised neural network test set generated by using Raman data. (b–d) PCA score plot comparison plots. Each plot compares three clinical groups Legends includes the averaged acoustic impedance values. Abbreviations in the legend: CAF: Chornic AF, PAF: post operative AF, NAF: no AF.