| Literature DB >> 30258115 |
Bukem Bilen1, Belkis Gokbulut2, Ulku Kafa3, Emre Heves4, Mehmet Naci Inci2, Mehmet Burcin Unlu2,5,6.
Abstract
Atherosclerotic plaques constitute the primary cause of heart attack and stroke. However, we still lack a clear identification of the plaques. Here, we evaluate the feasibility of scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy (TRFS) in atherosclerotic plaque characterization. We perform dual-modality microscopic imaging of the human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. We first show that the acoustic impedance values are statistically higher in calcified regions compared with the collagen-rich areas. We then use CdTe/CdS quantum dots for imaging the atherosclerotic plaques by TRFS and show that fluorescence lifetime values of the quantum dots in collagen-rich areas are notably different from the ones in calcified areas. In summary, both modalities are successful in differentiating the calcified regions from the collagen-rich areas within the plaques indicating that these techniques are confirmatory and may be combined to characterize atherosclerotic plaques in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30258115 PMCID: PMC6158264 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32788-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Acoustic impedance map of an atherosclerotic plaque obtained by comparing the reflected ultrasound signals from the surfaces of water and the sample. The scanning area is 4.8 mm × 4.8 mm.
Figure 2Acoustic impedance map of a fibrocalcific plaque obtained with the alternative sample setup, in which the acoustic waves are reflected directly from the sample’s surface without passing through the substrate. The scanning area is 4.8 mm × 4.8 mm.
Figure 3Acoustic impedance map of a severely calcific plaque sample obtained with the alternative sample setup. The scanning area is 4.8 mm × 4.8 mm.
Acoustic impedance values of carotid atherosclerotic plaques of 10 different patients with two distinguished regions of calcification and collagen.
| Patients (Age, Gender) | Acoustic Impedance (collagen-rich region) (MRayl) | Acoustic Impedance (calcific region) (MRayl) |
|---|---|---|
| 1–63, Female | 1.85 ± 0.08 | 2.08 ± 0.07 |
| 2–62, Female | 1.87 ± 0.08 | 2.24 ± 0.10 |
| 3–79, Male | 1.78 ± 0.17 | 2.39 ± 0.10 |
| 4–85, Male | 1.80 ± 0.18 | 2.30 ± 0.10 |
| 5–75, Male | 1.75 ± 0.24 | 2.51 ± 0.18 |
| 6–74, Male | 2.10 ± 0.21 | 3.95 ± 0.01 |
| 7–62, Female | 1.85 ± 0.09 | 2.12 ± 0.09 |
| 8–66, Female | 1.83 ± 0.10 | 2.56 ± 0.13 |
| 9–59, Female | 1.83 ± 0.18 | 2.16 ± 0.12 |
| 10–63, Male | 1.78 ± 0.07 | 2.37 ± 0.01 |
5 female and 5 male patients with divergent ages were studied for the correlation of age and gender on plaque contents.
Average lifetime values of CdTe/CdS quantum dots on calcific, collagen-rich and outermost regions of all atherosclerotic plaques.
| Region | < |
|---|---|
| Calcific | 1.45 ± 0.27 |
| Collagen-rich | 2.54 ± 0.23 |
| Outermost | 3.59 ± 0.22 |
Figure 4Fluorescence decay curves of CdTe/CdS quantum dots on calcific, collagen-rich and outermost regions of atherosclerotic plaques.
Figure 5Normalized absorption and photoluminescence spectra of CdTe/CdS quantum dots.
Figure 6Schematic of SAM setup in acoustic impedance mode.
Figure 7Principle of SAM in acoustic impedance mode. The acoustic waves reflected from the surfaces of distilled water and the tissue are collected by the same transducer and compared for the calculation of the acoustic impedance of the tissue.
Figure 8Alternative sample setup for the tissues.
Figure 9FLIM setup.