Literature DB >> 35438365

Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies.

Oke Gerke1,2, Andreas Kristian Pedersen3,4, Birgit Debrabant5, Ulrich Halekoh6, Sören Möller7,8.   

Abstract

The comparison of two quantitative measuring devices is often performed with the Limits of Agreement proposed by Bland and Altman in their seminal Lancet paper back in 1986. Sample size considerations were rare for such agreement analyses in the past, but recently several proposals have been made depending on how agreement is to be assessed and the number of replicates to be used. We have summarized recent developments and recommendations in various situations including a distinction between method comparison and observer variability studies. These include current state-of-the-art analysis of and reporting guidelines for agreement studies. General recommendations close the paper.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement; Bland-Altman analysis; Limits of Agreement; Repeatability; Reproducibility; Sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35438365     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00853-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  12 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Laurent Audigé; Stig Brorson; Allan Donner; Byron J Gajewski; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Chris Roberts; Mohamed Shoukri; David L Streiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.

Authors:  Qilong Yi; P Peter Wang; Yaohua He
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  Patrick Taffé
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  When can the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method be used and when it should not be used.

Authors:  Patrick Taffé
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The Bland-Altman range of agreement: Exact interval procedure and sample size determination.

Authors:  Show-Li Jan; Gwowen Shieh
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland-Altman methods of comparison.

Authors:  Erik Olofsen; Albert Dahan; Gerard Borsboom; Gordon Drummond
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  On Jones et al.'s method for extending Bland-Altman plots to limits of agreement with the mean for multiple observers.

Authors:  Heidi S Christensen; Jens Borgbjerg; Lars Børty; Martin Bøgsted
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  How to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Mie Holm Vilstrup; Eivind Antonsen Segtnan; Ulrich Halekoh; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.