Literature DB >> 17985364

Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement.

Qilong Yi1, P Peter Wang, Yaohua He.   

Abstract

In tandem with the rapid development of medical technology, methods for assessing intrarater and interrater reliability or agreement across tools for continuous measurements have become an increasingly important research topic. Thus far, a number of reliability assessment methods have been proposed. Among them, the limits of agreement and repeatability coefficients were found to be the most useful tools for assessing reliability when measurements are on a continuous scale. However, both are considered as descriptive methods. The concepts of consistency or conformity require an equivalence test without which judgment would be subjective. In this paper we will extend the repeatability coefficient approach and propose an equivalence test that can be used to confirm the agreement between two or more measurement tools or assess interrater and intrarater reliability. Using this approach, a formula to calculate sample size will also be suggested and examples will be provided to illustrate the method. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17985364     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Andreas Kristian Pedersen; Birgit Debrabant; Ulrich Halekoh; Sören Möller
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 2.  Reporting Standards for a Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews.

Authors:  Oke Gerke
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.