| Literature DB >> 35432523 |
Haipeng Xu1, Kelin He1,2, Rong Hu1, YanZhi Ge3, Xinyun Li1, Fengjia Ni1, Bei Que1, Yi Chen1, Ruijie Ma1,2.
Abstract
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Evidence shows that ischemic stroke (IS) accounts for nearly 80 percent of all strokes and that the etiology, risk factors, and prognosis of this disease differ by gender. Female patients may bear a greater burden than male patients. The immune system may play an important role in the pathophysiology of females with IS. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the key biomarkers and immune infiltration of female IS patients to develop effective treatment methods. Herein, we used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to determine the key modules and core genes in female IS patients using the GSE22255, GSE37587, and GSE16561 datasets from the GEO database. Subsequently, we performed functional enrichment analysis and built a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Ten genes were selected as the true central genes for further investigation. After that, we explored the specific molecular and biological functions of these hub genes to gain a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of female IS patients. Moreover, the "Cell type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT)" was used to examine the distribution pattern of immune subtypes in female patients with IS and normal controls, revealing a new potential target for clinical treatment of the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432523 PMCID: PMC9012649 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5379876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.144
The primers used in qRT-PCR.
| Primers | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5′-TGTCACCAACTGGGACGATA-3′ | 5′-GGGGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA-3′ |
| PRS28 | 5′-GCTGGCTAGGGTAACTAAAGTGCTG-3′ | 5′-TCGGATGATAGAGCGGCTGGTG-3′ |
| RPS6 | 5′-AGCGGTGGGAATGACAAACAAGG-3′ | 5′-CGCTTCCTCTCTCCAGTTCTCCTAG-3′ |
| RPS15A | 5′-ACAGGAAGGTTGAACAAGTGTGGAG-3′ | 5′-ACAATGAAACCAAACTGCCGTGATG-3′ |
| RPL7 | 5′-TTGCCCTGAAGACACTGCGAAAG-3′ | 5′-GCCATCCTAGCCATGCGAATCTC-3′ |
| RPL9 | 5′-ACACTGGGCTTCCGTTACAAGATG-3′ | 5′-CAACACCTGTCCTCATCCGAACC-3′ |
| RPL31 | 5′-TCCTCGGGCACTCAAAGAAATTCG-3′ | 5′-CTCGGATGCGGTACGGAACATTC-3′ |
| RPL14 | 5′-TGGAAAGCTGGTCGCAATCGTAG-3′ | 5′-CGCACTGTGTGGGAACTTGAGG-3′ |
| PABPC1 | 5′-TACCAGCCAGCACCTCCTTCAG-3′ | 5′-CAGCGAGGACTTGGTCTTAGTTGAG-3′ |
| PFDN5 | 5′-GCTGAGGATGCCAAGGACTTCTTC-3′ | 5′-CATCATTTCCACGACGGCTTGTTTC-3′ |
| TNF | 5′-ATGGGCTCCCTCTCATCAGTTCC-3′ | 5′-ATGGGCTCCCTCTCATCAGTTCC-3′ |
Figure 1The workflow of the whole study.
Figure 2Construction and module division of the co-expression network. (a) Cluster tree diagram of the sample. The cluster tree reflects the distance between 96 samples. (b) Soft threshold (R^2) determination; the fitting degree R^2 increases with an increase in the soft threshold. When the fitting degree R^2 > 0.8 (red line), the corresponding network is more consistent with the scale-free network distribution. (c) Soft threshold selection (average connectivity).
Figure 3Identification of modules associated with clinical characteristics of IS females. (a) Cluster tree diagram and module feature relationship diagram for hierarchical cluster analysis to detect co-expression clustering with the corresponding color distribution. Each color represented a module in the gene co-expression network constructed by WGCNA. Heat map of the correlation between the module. (b) Characteristic gene in IS female samples and normal samples. ((c) and (d)) The relationship between the scatter plot of the members of the module and the genetic importance of morbid states.
Figure 4GO and KEGG pathway analysis. (a) GO analysis of genes involved in turquoise module. (b) Enriched pathways of genes in turquoise module by the KEGG.
The top 10 GO enrichment terms of genes in turquoise module.
| ONTOLOGY | ID | Description | p.adjust | Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | GO:0042110 | T cell activation | 0.000472374 | 17 |
| BP | GO:1903131 | Mononuclear cell differentiation | 0.000472374 | 16 |
| BP | GO:0001819 | Positive regulation of cytokine production | 0.00120906 | 15 |
| BP | GO:0002446 | Neutrophil mediated immunity | 0.003207892 | 15 |
| BP | GO:0042119 | Neutrophil activation | 0.003207892 | 15 |
| BP | GO:1903037 | Regulation of leukocyte cell-cell adhesion | 0.000472374 | 14 |
| BP | GO:0030098 | Lymphocyte differentiation | 0.001054285 | 14 |
| BP | GO:0007159 | Leukocyte cell-cell adhesion | 0.001059699 | 14 |
| BP | GO:0050727 | Regulation of inflammatory response | 0.001059699 | 14 |
| BP | GO:0022407 | Regulation of cell-cell adhesion | 0.003207892 | 14 |
| CC | GO:0005840 | Ribosome | 0.003853809 | 10 |
| CC | GO:0034774 | Secretory granule lumen | 0.022036358 | 10 |
| CC | GO:0060205 | Cytoplasmic vesicle lumen | 0.022036358 | 10 |
| CC | GO:0031983 | Vesicle lumen | 0.022036358 | 10 |
| CC | GO:0022626 | Cytosolic ribosome | 8.41E-05 | 9 |
| CC | GO:0044391 | Ribosomal subunit | 0.003853809 | 9 |
| CC | GO:0031252 | Cell leading edge | 0.118712942 | 9 |
| CC | GO:0005925 | Focal adhesion | 0.121501769 | 9 |
| CC | GO:0030055 | Cell-substrate junction | 0.128157705 | 9 |
| CC | GO:0045121 | Membrane raft | 0.006295321 | 8 |
| MF | GO:0004857 | Enzyme inhibitor activity | 0.212404345 | 10 |
| MF | GO:0042277 | Peptide binding | 0.212404345 | 9 |
| MF | GO:0033218 | Amide binding | 0.247781289 | 9 |
| MF | GO:0003712 | Transcription coregulator activity | 0.385576533 | 9 |
| MF | GO:0003735 | Structural constituent of ribosome | 0.212404345 | 7 |
| MF | GO:0019207 | Kinase regulator activity | 0.212404345 | 7 |
| MF | GO:0019887 | Protein kinase regulator activity | 0.247781289 | 6 |
| MF | GO:0030246 | Carbohydrate binding | 0.389028377 | 6 |
| MF | GO:0045182 | Translation regulator activity | 0.247781289 | 5 |
| MF | GO:0003714 | Transcription corepressor activity | 0.364059812 | 5 |
The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of genes in turquoise module.
| ID | Description | p.adjust | Count |
|---|---|---|---|
| hsa05171 | Coronavirus disease - COVID-19 | 0.049485195 | 9 |
| hsa05135 | Yersinia infection | 0.049485195 | 7 |
| hsa03010 | Ribosome | 0.050642504 | 7 |
| hsa04066 | HIF-1 signaling pathway | 0.049485195 | 6 |
| hsa04650 | Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity | 0.08036003 | 6 |
| hsa04621 | NOD-like receptor signaling pathway | 0.247330937 | 6 |
| hsa05202 | Transcriptional misregulation in cancer | 0.247330937 | 6 |
| hsa05169 | Epstein-Barr virus infection | 0.293398065 | 6 |
| hsa05208 | Chemical carcinogenesis - reactive oxygen species | 0.327462276 | 6 |
Figure 5Immunoinfiltration of IS female and healthy female. (a) Percentage distribution of 22 immune cell subtypes in 96 samples from three datasets. (b) Heat map of the ratio of 22 immune cells in each sample. (c) Related heat maps of 22 immune cells. (d) Violin diagram of the difference in immune cell infiltration between female stroke patients and normal females.
Figure 6Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks associated with differences in female patients with IS.
Figure 7Core gene clusters in the co-expression network constructed from female IS patients. The depth of color indicated the levels of the central genes from low to high.
Figure 8Validation of the hub genes by qRT-PCR. Black, normal samples; red, IS samples. ∗∗means p-value <0.01, and #means no difference. All data correspond to the average ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by the two-tailed Student's t-test.