| Literature DB >> 23984903 |
Mahmood Chamankhah1, Eftekhar Eftekharpour, Soheila Karimi-Abdolrezaee, Paul C Boutros, Serban San-Marina, Michael G Fehlings.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aneurysm clip impact-compression model of spinal cord injury (SCI) is a standard injury model in animals that closely mimics the primary mechanism of most human injuries: acute impact and persisting compression. Its histo-pathological and behavioural outcomes are extensively similar to human SCI. To understand the distinct molecular events underlying this injury model we analyzed global mRNA abundance changes during the acute, subacute and chronic stages of a moderate to severe injury to the rat spinal cord.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23984903 PMCID: PMC3846681 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Time - Point ProbeSet Data Analysis. A. Unsupervised machine learning grouping of animals by expression. To visualize temporal patterns as well as inter-animal variability, unsupervised machine learning was employed followed by a divisive hierarchical clustering algorithm (DIANA) to cluster differentially expressed ProbeSets in any pair-wise contrast (see Methods). Finally, standard agglomerative hierarchical clustering was used to group animals. The result is visualized using the Heatplus package of BioConductor. Heatmap (columns: samples; rows: genes, in red and blue coloring, depicting up- and down-regulation respectively). B. Principal Component Analysis of Individual Time Point Transcripts. Using Partek GS version 6.5, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) of the 33042 transcripts on the 230 2.0 GeneChip array for all animals at each time point to assess variability of the data across individual animals and time points. There are inter-individual differences but eclipses show that there are no outliers in our experiment. Additionally, the eclipses of Day 7, 14 and 56 cross each other, which indicate some level of commonality between these time points, as was evidenced and shown in the tree view of the heat map. C. Volcano plots of fold change values of all 33042 ProbeSets vs. transformed (− log10) ANOVA t test p-values. Individual time point data were plotted for comparison. ANOVA t test p-values for pair-wise contrasts between each time point data relative to sham were calculated and transformed to - log10 values and plotted against fold change values. D. Percentage of ProbeSets with ANOVA t test p-values higher than 0.05. The percentage of ProbeSets with p-values higher than 0.05 was calculated at all time-points and plotted at various fold change values.
Time-point gene set data analysis at different fold change criteria (p ≤ 0.05)
| | | | |
| Up | 2430 | 1511 | 972 |
| Down | 1579 | 989 | 620 |
| | | | |
| Up | 1687 | 864 | 502 |
| Down | 940 | 440 | 208 |
| | | | |
| Up | 1593 | 922 | 615 |
| Down | 1062 | 581 | 322 |
| | | | |
| Up | 1126 | 696 | 479 |
| Down | 1056 | 577 | 327 |
| | | | |
| Up | 1173 | 729 | 482 |
| Down | 995 | 537 | 284 |
Transcripts with ANOVA t test p-values ≥0.05 were removed from the initial list and the resulting data were analyzed using STEM to average the fold change values based on the median of fold changes for genes with multiple probe sets. ProbeSets with different fold change values combined with ANOVA t test p-values ≤0.05 were considered for this analysis.
Figure 2Time-Point Gene Set Data Analysis. A-D. Relationship between the nature of deregulated transcripts at different time points. Deregulated transcripts (fold change ≥ 1.5) at each time point were examined for common and unique genes using a Venn diagram. Overlapping areas represent common genes between different time points. Day 1 deregulated genes were compared with day 3 and day 7 transcripts in A, and with day 14 and 56 in B. Day 3 and Day 7 deregulations were compared with both day 14 and day 56 in C and D, respectively. The transcriptome on day 1 is more similar to day 7 and less similar to days 3, 14 or 56. Additionally, day 14 and 56 deregulations are the most similar to each other with about 82% of the genes common between the two time points.
Time-series gene set data analysis by STEM at different fold change criteria (p ≤ 0.05)
| 0 | 1820 | 1251 | 831 |
| 1 | 3066 | 2058 | 1367 |
| 2 | 3916 | 2507 | 1615 |
| 3 | 4577 | 2848 | 1829 |
| 4 | 5050 | 3087 | 1958 |
Fold change values with ANOVA t test p-values ≥0.05 were removed from the initial list and the resulting data were analyzed using STEM for time-series expression analysis at different values for the “Maximum Number of Missing Values” parameter.
Figure 3Distinct Significant Expression Profiles Clustered by STEM. A-H. Average fold change values for the genes in each cluster were plotted against the real time scale of the time-points post-injury. Error bars denote the standard deviation of the mean. Three classes of expression profiles are observed. Class I profiles (A-C) display an “up-down” pattern with the peak of up-regulation in 24 hours (profiles 45, 46 and 48) post-injury. The up-regulation is followed by decline of transcript levels, either sharply back to normal values (profiles 45 and 48) or gradually to higher than control values (profiles 46). Class II profiles (1 and 0) are quite similar to each other as they display down-regulations of many genes on day 1, which stay at lower than normal levels even at 8 weeks post-injury. Class III profiles (E-H) represent fluctuating profiles and are subdivided into two clusters. Cluster I (Profiles 44 and 41) is marked by an early increase in gene expression by day 1 followed by sudden decline in transcript level at day 3. In profile 44, this transient change in transcription level is followed by an escalating condition whereby the same transcripts are again up-regulated by day 7 and stay at higher than control values until 8 weeks post-injury. In cluster II (profile 6), a reverse phenomenon is observed, where the early event is a sharp decrease in transcript level and a follow up fluctuation pattern in gene expression. Despite fluctuations in gene expression levels, the transcript levels of genes in profiles 6 remain significantly lower than control levels throughout the course of experiment.
Figure 4Time-Series Gene Ontology (GO) Enrichment Analysis of Deregulated Transcripts after SCI. A. Number of enriched GO terms as a function of fold change and p-value of enrichment parameters. Filtering criteria in STEM were set to different values between 1 and 4, and the number of Biological Process GO terms with corrected p-values of ≤ 0.001, ≤0.0001 and ≤ 0.00001 were calculated and plotted. B. Distribution of enriched GO terms with to GO levels 3–20. GO enrichment analysis was performed on transcripts with a minimum of 1.5 fold changes in expression (ANOVA t test p ≤ 0.05). This resulted in 329 and 649 enriched GO terms at p-value cutoffs of 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively. Enriched Biological Process GO categories were positioned on the directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure of the gene ontology hierarchy. The number of significant GO terms at every GO level at were plotted and also shown on top of each bar. Note that at p ≤ 0.001, no GO terms were obtained at GO levels 15–17.
Figure 5REViGO Scatterplot of the Enriched GO Cluster Representatives from Time-Series Analysis. Time-series GO enrichment analysis for transcripts with a minimum of 1.5 fold change regardless of their expression profile at p-value cut off of 0.0001 led to 329 GO terms at GO level ≥3 and 267 terms at GO level ≥5. The resulting lists of 329 (A) and 267 (B) GO terms along with their p-values were further summarized by REViGO reduction analysis tool that condenses the GO description by removing redundant terms [40]. The remaining terms after the redundancy reduction were plotted in a two dimensional space. Bubble color indicates the p-value (legend in upper right-hand corner), the two ends of the colors are red and blue, depicting lower- and higher p-values respectively. Size indicates the relative frequency of the GO term in the underlying reference EBI GOA database [41]. Bubbles of more general terms are larger.
Figure 6Common and Unique GO Terms between Time-Points. GO enrichment analysis was performed separately for deregulated transcripts (fold change ≥ 1.5, ANOVA t test p-value ≤ 0.05) at each time point. The enriched GO terms at a less stringent condition (p ≤ 0.05) were examined for common and unique terms using Venn diagram. All time-points were compared to each other simultaneously. Overlapping areas represent common terms between different time points. As shown, 736 terms were common to all time-points, of which 284 had a p-value ≤ 0.00001.
Common GO terms across all time-points post-injury
| GO:0009605 | response to external stimulus | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0050896 | response to stimulus | |||
| GO:0006950 | response to stress | |||
| GO:0033993 | response to lipid | |||
| GO:0007599 | hemostasis | |||
| GO:0002252 | immune effector process | |||
| GO:0070482 | response to oxygen levels | |||
| GO:0048514 | blood vessel morphogenesis | |||
| GO:0006979 | response to oxidative stress | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0006954 | inflammatory response | |||
| GO:0001816 | cytokine production | |||
| GO:0001816 | cytokine production | |||
| | | |||
| | | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0034097 | response to cytokine stimulus | |||
| | | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0045087 | innate immune response | |||
| GO:0030595 | leukocyte chemotaxis | |||
| GO:0002275 | myeloid cell activation involved in immune response | |||
| GO:0002274 | myeloid leukocyte activation | |||
| GO:0012501 | programmed cell death | |||
| GO:0006897 | endocytosis | |||
| | | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0050776 | regulation of immune response | |||
| GO:0002758 | innate immune response-activating signal transduction | | | |
| GO:0002429 | immune response-activating cell surface receptor signaling pathway | |||
| GO:0002758 | innate immune response-activating signal transduction | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0016337 | cell-cell adhesion | |||
| GO:0007165 | signal transduction | | | |
| GO:0007166 | cell surface receptor signaling pathway | |||
| GO:0050900 | leukocyte migration | |||
| GO:0046649 | lymphocyte activation | |||
| | | |||
| GO:0046651 | lymphocyte proliferation | | | |
| GO:0042113 | B cell activation | |||
| GO:0046651 | lymphocyte proliferation | | | |
| GO:0042110 | T cell activation | |||
| GO:0030098 | lymphocyte differentiation | | | |
| GO:0042110 | T cell activation | |||
| GO:0002429 | immune response-activating cell surface receptor signaling pathway | |||
| GO:0050851 | antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway | |||
| GO:0002460 | adaptive immune response based on somatic recombination of immune receptors built from immunoglobulin superfamily domains | | ||
| GO:0019724 | B cell mediated immunity | |||
| GO:0044707 | single-multicellular organism process | |||
Figure 7Temporal Pattern of Various GO Biological Processes Common to all Time-Points. A-P. Temporal pattern of change of each GO term was analyzed in order to examine the order of events after spinal cord injury. Multiple and pairwise comparisons of the enriched GO terms obtained for all time-points were made. 284 terms were found to be significantly deregulated across all time-time points post-injury (p-value ≤ 0.00001). The most specific terms were further analyzed for their gene content as well as their up- or down-regulations. The p-values of each term at various time-points were transformed to - Log10 value and plotted. Each graph depicts a single or multiple enriched GO biological process.