Objective: To report a new offset parameter for total hip arthroplasty (THA)-greater trochanter offset (GTO), and analyze the effectiveness and feasibility of this parameter based on clinical data. Methods: The 47 patients who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2016 and May 2020 were selected as the research object. The global offset (GO) was used as the offset parameter in preoperative design. Firstly, the test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of GTO were analyzed based on pelvic X-ray films. The GTO reconstruction was defined as the difference between the operative side and the healthy side within ±5 mm, and 47 patients were divided into the reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group. General data (age, gender, type and side of fracture, the interval between injury and operation), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Harris score, gait score, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were recorded and compared between two groups. Then, the GTO was used as the offset parameter in preoperative design of 21 patients (GTO group) admitted between June 2020 and December 2020. The pre- and post-operative clinical data were compared between GTO group and GO group to explore the feasibility of GTO for THA. Results: Statistical analysis showed that GTO had good test-retest reliability (P<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in gender, age, type and side of fracture, the interval between injury and operation, preoperative VAS score, and LLD at 1 year after operation between the GTO reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group, as well as between the GO and GTO groups (P>0.05). The Harris score and gait score at 1 year after operation, and difference of VAS score between pre- and post- operation in the reconstruction group and GTO group were significantly better than those in the non-reconstruction group and GO group, respectively (P<0.05). There were 23 cases (48.9%) in the GO group and 19 cases (90.5%) in the GTO group with GTO reconstruction, and the difference was significant (χ2=10.606, P=0.001). There were 25 cases (53.2%) in the GO group and 13 cases (61.9%) in the GTO group with GO reconstruction, and the difference was not significant (χ2=0.447, P=0.504). There were 34 cases (72.3%) in the GO group and 19 cases (90.5%) in the GTO group with LLD reconstruction, and the difference was not significant (χ2=2.777, P=0.096). Conclusion: GTO has reliable test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability. GTO as a parameter of preoperative offset reconstruction plan of THA can obtain good reconstruction of offset and limb length, and obtain a good effectiveness.
Objective: To report a new offset parameter for total hip arthroplasty (THA)-greater trochanter offset (GTO), and analyze the effectiveness and feasibility of this parameter based on clinical data. Methods: The 47 patients who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2016 and May 2020 were selected as the research object. The global offset (GO) was used as the offset parameter in preoperative design. Firstly, the test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability of GTO were analyzed based on pelvic X-ray films. The GTO reconstruction was defined as the difference between the operative side and the healthy side within ±5 mm, and 47 patients were divided into the reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group. General data (age, gender, type and side of fracture, the interval between injury and operation), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Harris score, gait score, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were recorded and compared between two groups. Then, the GTO was used as the offset parameter in preoperative design of 21 patients (GTO group) admitted between June 2020 and December 2020. The pre- and post-operative clinical data were compared between GTO group and GO group to explore the feasibility of GTO for THA. Results: Statistical analysis showed that GTO had good test-retest reliability (P<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in gender, age, type and side of fracture, the interval between injury and operation, preoperative VAS score, and LLD at 1 year after operation between the GTO reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group, as well as between the GO and GTO groups (P>0.05). The Harris score and gait score at 1 year after operation, and difference of VAS score between pre- and post- operation in the reconstruction group and GTO group were significantly better than those in the non-reconstruction group and GO group, respectively (P<0.05). There were 23 cases (48.9%) in the GO group and 19 cases (90.5%) in the GTO group with GTO reconstruction, and the difference was significant (χ2=10.606, P=0.001). There were 25 cases (53.2%) in the GO group and 13 cases (61.9%) in the GTO group with GO reconstruction, and the difference was not significant (χ2=0.447, P=0.504). There were 34 cases (72.3%) in the GO group and 19 cases (90.5%) in the GTO group with LLD reconstruction, and the difference was not significant (χ2=2.777, P=0.096). Conclusion: GTO has reliable test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability. GTO as a parameter of preoperative offset reconstruction plan of THA can obtain good reconstruction of offset and limb length, and obtain a good effectiveness.
Entities:
Keywords:
Total hip arthroplasty; global offset; greater trochanter offset
Authors: Juan M Nossa; Juan M Muñoz; Emilio A Riveros; Guillermo Rueda; Diego Márquez; Javier Pérez Journal: Hip Int Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Robert Springorum; Ernst Sendtner; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: G Lecerf; M H Fessy; R Philippot; P Massin; F Giraud; X Flecher; J Girard; P Mertl; E Marchetti; E Stindel Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 2.256