OBJECTIVE: To measure the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of post total hip arthroplasty (THA) leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurement on radiographs as well as to evaluate its accuracy by comparing it with LLD measurement on computed tomographic scanogram (CT-scanogram). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, postoperative LLD measurements in ten THA patients were made by four observers on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis (inter-teardrop line to the tip of lesser trochanter) and compared to LLD measurements made on CT-scanogram scout views of the lower limb. Two observers repeated the LLD measurements on radiographs 8 weeks after the first measurements. The interobserver reliability of the LLD measurement on plain radiographs was evaluated by comparing the measurements of the four observers and the intraobserver reproducibility by comparing the two repeated measurements made by the two observers. RESULTS: We found excellent interobserver reliability (mean ICC 0.83) and intraobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.90 and 0.88) of the LLD measurements on plain radiographs. There was a moderate to excellent agreement, but with wide variation of measurements among the four observers, when plain radiographic measurement was compared with CT-scanogram (ICC 0.58, 0.60, 0.71, and 0.82). CONCLUSION: Despite the excellent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of LLD measurement on radiographs, clinicians should be aware of its limited accuracy when compared to CT-scanogram.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of post total hip arthroplasty (THA) leg length discrepancy (LLD) measurement on radiographs as well as to evaluate its accuracy by comparing it with LLD measurement on computed tomographic scanogram (CT-scanogram). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, postoperative LLD measurements in ten THA patients were made by four observers on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis (inter-teardrop line to the tip of lesser trochanter) and compared to LLD measurements made on CT-scanogram scout views of the lower limb. Two observers repeated the LLD measurements on radiographs 8 weeks after the first measurements. The interobserver reliability of the LLD measurement on plain radiographs was evaluated by comparing the measurements of the four observers and the intraobserver reproducibility by comparing the two repeated measurements made by the two observers. RESULTS: We found excellent interobserver reliability (mean ICC 0.83) and intraobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.90 and 0.88) of the LLD measurements on plain radiographs. There was a moderate to excellent agreement, but with wide variation of measurements among the four observers, when plain radiographic measurement was compared with CT-scanogram (ICC 0.58, 0.60, 0.71, and 0.82). CONCLUSION: Despite the excellent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of LLD measurement on radiographs, clinicians should be aware of its limited accuracy when compared to CT-scanogram.
Authors: Anne H Leitzes; Hollis G Potter; Terry Amaral; Robert G Marx; Stephen Lyman; Roger F Widmann Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: W Rheault; B Albright; C Beyers; M Franta; A Johnson; M Skowronek; J Dougherty Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 1992 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Brandon S Beamer; Jordan H Morgan; Christopher Barr; Michael J Weaver; Mark S Vrahas Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Michael Worlicek; Markus Weber; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Wörner; Florian Völlner; Hans R Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 2.362