BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because there is wide variation in case-mix adjusted outcomes across dialysis facilities, it is possible that top-performing facilities use practices not shared by others. We sought to catalogue "best practices" that may account for interfacility variations in outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This multidisciplinary study identified candidate best practices in dialysis through a staged process, including systematic review, cognitive interviews, and a national "virtual focus group" of dialysis providers. The resulting candidate practices were rank-ordered by perceived importance as determined by mean RAND Appropriateness Scores from a national survey of nephrologists, nurses, and opinion leaders. RESULTS: A total of 155 candidate best practices were identified. Among these, respondents believed dialysis outcomes are most strongly related to 1) characteristics of multidisciplinary care conferences, 2) technician proficiency in protecting vascular access, 3) training of nurses to provide education in fluid management, vascular access, and nutrition, 4) use of random and blinded audits of staff performance, and 5) communication and teamwork among staff. In contrast, there was wide disagreement about the importance of facility-based health maintenance practices, optimal staffing ratios, frequency of dialysis-based physician visits, and optimal frequency of multidisciplinary care. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a "conceptual map" of candidate dialysis best practices and highlights areas of general agreement and disagreement. These findings can help the dialysis community think critically about what may define "best practice" and provide targets for future research in quality improvement.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Because there is wide variation in case-mix adjusted outcomes across dialysis facilities, it is possible that top-performing facilities use practices not shared by others. We sought to catalogue "best practices" that may account for interfacility variations in outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This multidisciplinary study identified candidate best practices in dialysis through a staged process, including systematic review, cognitive interviews, and a national "virtual focus group" of dialysis providers. The resulting candidate practices were rank-ordered by perceived importance as determined by mean RAND Appropriateness Scores from a national survey of nephrologists, nurses, and opinion leaders. RESULTS: A total of 155 candidate best practices were identified. Among these, respondents believed dialysis outcomes are most strongly related to 1) characteristics of multidisciplinary care conferences, 2) technician proficiency in protecting vascular access, 3) training of nurses to provide education in fluid management, vascular access, and nutrition, 4) use of random and blinded audits of staff performance, and 5) communication and teamwork among staff. In contrast, there was wide disagreement about the importance of facility-based health maintenance practices, optimal staffing ratios, frequency of dialysis-based physician visits, and optimal frequency of multidisciplinary care. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a "conceptual map" of candidate dialysis best practices and highlights areas of general agreement and disagreement. These findings can help the dialysis community think critically about what may define "best practice" and provide targets for future research in quality improvement.
Authors: Ashwini R Sehgal; Janeen B Leon; Laura A Siminoff; Mendel E Singer; Lisa M Bunosky; Randall D Cebul Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Brennan Spiegel; Roger Bolus; Amar A Desai; Philip Zagar; Tom Parker; John Moran; Matthew D Solomon; Osman Khawar; Matthew Gitlin; Jennifer Talley; Allen Nissenson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Cynthia B Whitman; Sanatan Shreay; Matthew Gitlin; Martijn G H van Oijen; Brennan M R Spiegel Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Amar A Desai; Roger Bolus; Allen Nissenson; Glenn M Chertow; Sally Bolus; Matthew D Solomon; Osman S Khawar; Jennifer Talley; Brennan M R Spiegel Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 8.237