Literature DB >> 24761424

Psychological attitude to self-appraisal of stoma patients: prospective observation of stoma duration effect to self-appraisal.

Kyung Sook Hong1, Bo-Young Oh1, Eui-Jung Kim2, Soon Sup Chung1, Kwang Ho Kim1, Ryung-Ah Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In recent years, many psychological problems in patients with stomas have been addressed in a number of studies. But there are only a few studies that use objective measures to take into account self-appraisal by patients with permanent or temporary stomas. The aim of this study is to compare the psychological attitude of patients with permanent and temporary stomas and to determine the most appropriate psychological supportive care.
METHODS: Sixty-five patients, who received a stoma between January 2009 and March 2012, were classified into two groups with either permanent or temporary stomas and were observed prospectively. We developed a questionnaire with the aid of a psychiatrist to analyze the grade of psychological attitude of self-appraisal of patients. The questionnaire was categorized into three parts; body image scale, self-esteem scale, and depression scale. Patients responded to the questionnaire 4 weeks after the operation and the answers of each group were compared.
RESULTS: Out of 65 patients, 42 received temporary stomas and 23 received permanent stomas. There was no significant mean difference between permanent and temporary stoma patients in the body image scale, the self-esteem scale, and the depression scale. However, patients with a permanent stoma tended to have a worse body image and lower self-esteem on some specific items within the questionnaires.
CONCLUSION: Patients with stomas have negative attitudes toward themselves and some meaningful differences were found between different types of stoma applied. Surgeons should be concerned about postoperative psychological support for patients with stomas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body image; Depression; Ostomy; Self esteem

Year:  2014        PMID: 24761424      PMCID: PMC3994620          DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.3.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res        ISSN: 2288-6575            Impact factor:   1.859


  14 in total

1.  Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis.

Authors:  N D Karanjia; A P Corder; P J Holdsworth; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Treatment of non-disseminated cancer of the lower rectum.

Authors:  R J Nicholls; C Hall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Quality of life after anterior resection versus abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  P Jess; J Christiansen; P Bech
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  I Gastinger; F Marusch; R Steinert; S Wolff; F Koeckerling; H Lippert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Quality of life of Danish colorectal cancer patients with and without a stoma.

Authors:  Lone Ross; Annemette G Abild-Nielsen; Birthe L Thomsen; Randi V Karlsen; Ellen H Boesen; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy.

Authors:  J Camilleri-Brennan; R. J. C Steele
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Objective assessment of morbidity and quality of life after surgery for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  J. Camilleri-Brennan; R. J. C. Steele
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  A Prospective longitudinal evaluation of quality of life after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Pascal Gervaz; Pascal Bucher; Béatrice Konrad; Philippe Morel; Sonia Beyeler; Laurence Lataillade; Abdelkarim Allal
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Quality of life and patient's expectations after closure of a temporary stoma.

Authors:  Michael Siassi; Werner Hohenberger; Friedrich Lösel; Maren Weiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of high-quality nursing service in the delivery room on puerperae and newborns.

Authors:  Qi Han; Xianchao Kong; Yulan Cui
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Clinical efficacy of nutritional diet therapy on gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shan Xu; Qin Yu; Jiayi Mi; Hua Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Physical activity interventions for disease-related physical and mental health during and following treatment in people with non-advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maresa McGettigan; Chris R Cardwell; Marie M Cantwell; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-03

4.  Psychological Adaptation to Alteration of Body Image among Stoma Patients: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Umesh Jayarajah; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

5.  Urinary undiversion by conversion of the incontinent ileovesicostomy to augmentation ileocystoplasty in spinal cord injured patients.

Authors:  Patrick J Shenot; Seth Teplitsky; Andrew Margules; Aaron Miller; Akhil K Das
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.040

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.