Literature DB >> 35415119

An Incognizant Glitch-pinnacle Polyliner Dissociation: A Case Report.

Ratnakar V1, Aditya P Apte1, Ashok Raju Gottemukkala1, Adarsh Annapareddy1, A V Gurava Reddy1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Liner dissociation of the pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system is a rare but documented complication. Although a few reports are published internationally, to the best of our knowledge no cases have been documented from India so far. Case Report: A 31-year-old male presented with failed femoral head fracture fixation for which total hip replacement was done. Postoperatively at 18 months, he was diagnosed with pinnacle liner dissociation and liner exchange was performed.
Conclusion: This report aims to raise awareness about the incidence of pinnacle liner dissociation. Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liner dissociation; pinnacle; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 35415119      PMCID: PMC8930316          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i11.2530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


With increasing reports on acute dissociation of liner, the operating surgeons should be aware about this while using the Pinnacle System.

Introduction

Liner dissociation is a unique problem associated with the pinnacle system. Till now, 34 instances have been reported worldwide. We describe a similar instance in a 31 years old patient which was managed with liner exchange at our institute.

Case Report

A 31-year-old male, BMI 30.61, met with a RTA 2 years back leading to trauma to the left hip. He was diagnosed with pipkin type 2 femoral head fracture dislocation and underwent open reduction with multiple headless Herbert screw fixation at a peripheral hospital. He presented to us with failed osteosynthesis 1 month post-fixation (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

The primary X-ray with which the patient presented at our institute depicting a failed osteosynthesis of femoral head fracture fixation.

The primary X-ray with which the patient presented at our institute depicting a failed osteosynthesis of femoral head fracture fixation. Complex primary left total hip replacement was performed at our institute [Table 1]. Patient was successfully rehabilitated postoperatively and was able to resume active lifestyle. At routine 6 months follow-up, patient was doing well and the radiographs showed good integration of the acetabular shell and femoral stem (Fig. 2, 3).
Figure 2

AP view after the primary total hip replacement.

Figure 3

Lateral view after the primary total hip replacement.

AP view after the primary total hip replacement. Lateral view after the primary total hip replacement. He continued to be asymptomatic till 18 months postoperatively when he noticed catching pain in the left groin followed by audible clunk while getting up from a chair. Radiographs revealed eccentric position of the femoral head in the cup while the cup and stem positioning looked acceptable (Fig. 4, 5).
Figure 4

AP view 18 months post primary THA. Eccentric positioning of the femoral head can be noted suggestive of liner dissociation.

Figure 5

Lateral view 18 months post-primary THA. Eccentric positioning of the femoral head can be noted suggestive of liner dissociation.

AP view 18 months post primary THA. Eccentric positioning of the femoral head can be noted suggestive of liner dissociation. Lateral view 18 months post-primary THA. Eccentric positioning of the femoral head can be noted suggestive of liner dissociation. Further investigations revealed normal biochemical markers, ruling out infection. CT scan was done to assess femoral and acetabular component positioning. We found acetabular cup inclination at 48° and anteversion of 34°. Femur anteversion was found to be at 20°. The hip was explored through routine posterior approach. Polyethylene liner dissociation was noted and the head was directly articulating with the acetabular shell. Posterior lip of the liner had fractured and the head had visible corrosive damage (Fig. 6, 7). The trunnion looked clinically intact (Fig. 8). Acetabular screws were not protruding and were fully seated in the shell.
Figure 6

Broken polyethylene liner extracted.

Figure 7

Femoral head showing evidence of corrosive damage.

Figure 8

Trunnion showing no visible signs of corrosion.

Broken polyethylene liner extracted. Femoral head showing evidence of corrosive damage. Trunnion showing no visible signs of corrosion. The acetabular cup was well integrated and an attempt was made to remove both the screws. One screw was removed easily and the other screw could not be removed and hence was left in situ. The liner was exchanged with marathon polyethylene 10° (32 mm ID and 50 mm OD) with the lip placed anteriorly to counteract the increased anteversion. The head was replaced with 32 mm ceramic head. Postoperatively, he was able to resume active life by 3 weeks. At 1 year follow-up, patient is asymptomatic, had completely resumed all daily activities and radiograph revealed no abnormalities (Fig. 9).
Figure 9

Post-operative picture at 1 year follow-up following liner and head exchange.

Post-operative picture at 1 year follow-up following liner and head exchange.

Discussion

The depuy pinnacle hip system has an excellent track record over the past decade. In 2014, Callaghan et al. published 10 year survival rates up to 99 % [1]. The system was introduced in the late 1990s as a successor to the Duraloc [2]. Its shell is a hemispheric titanium cup with a porous surface. As oppose to the locking ring of the Duraloc, it features a morse taper mechanism that accommodates the liner [3]. Mesko [4] described the first case of pinnacle liner dissociation in 2009 and so far 34 cases have been described worldwide (6 New Zealand, 27 USA, and 1 Spain) [5, 6, 7, 8]. Inaccurate implant positioning and improper locking of the liner in the shell are the surgeon dependent factors predisposing to the dissociation [5]. In our case, the acetabular inclination was normal and the screws were not protruding. The only likely mechanism of failure that we could postulate was the excessive acetabular anteversion leading to posterior femoro acetabular impingement. However, in a case series of 23 dissociations published by Yun et al. [7], they noticed that only 14 hips were positioned in the “safe zone” and rest nine hips were outliers. Thus, impingement cannot be the only factor for failure. To improve the wear rates the highly cross-linked polyethylene used in the pinnacle system is irradiated to 50 KGy. However, this has reduced its mechanical strength [9]. The Pinnacle System has demonstrated reduced pullout strength as compared to its previous designs. There have been reports that the peripheral locking tabs become round over time further compromising the locking mechanism [7]. Liner dissociation could be attributed to these factors.

Conclusion

We believe that the actual incidence of liner dissociation is more than what has been documented so far. The aim of this report is to raise awareness among surgeons regarding the liner dissociation in the pinnacle system and to initiate a dialog with the manufacturers if needed. Polyethylene wear leads to eccentric positioning of femur head in acetabular shell on radiographs. However, it is unlikely to happen in early post-operative period. Although Pinnacle liner dissociation is a rare and under-reported complication, it has a similar radiographic appearance and should be kept as differential diagnosis for the same. The patient’s consent was taken before submitting the data to publication. Declaration of patient consent : The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient’s parents have given their consent for patient images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient’s parents understand that his names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Conflict of interest:Nil Source of support:None
  8 in total

1.  Long-term porous-coated cup survivorship using spikes, screws, and press-fitting for initial fixation.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Robert H Hopper; C Anderson Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  A review of current cross-linked polyethylenes used in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  William H Harris; Orhun K Muratoglu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A comparison of a second- and a third-generation modular cup design: is new improved?

Authors:  Cara C Powers; Henry Ho; Sarah E Beykirch; Cathy Huynh; Robert H Hopper; C Anderson Engh; Charles A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Acute liner disassociation of a Pinnacle acetabular component.

Authors:  J Wesley Mesko
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Polyethylene Liner Dissociation Is a Complication of the DePuy Pinnacle Cup: A Report of 23 Cases.

Authors:  Andrew Yun; Emmanuel N Koli; John Moreland; Richard Iorio; John F Tilzey; J Wesley Mesko; Gwo-Chin Lee; Mark Froimson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Fixation and wear with a contemporary acetabular component and cross-linked polyethylene at minimum 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; John J Callaghan; Michael D Stefl; Tyler J Willman; Steve S Liu; Devon D Goetz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Pinnacle polyethylene liner dissociation: a report of 3 cases.

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Mike B Anderson; Christopher Peters; Christopher Pelt; Jeremy Gililland
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Polyethylene liner dissociation with the Pinnacle acetabular component: should we be concerned?

Authors:  Adeel R Memon; David Gwynne-Jones
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-01-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.