| Literature DB >> 35413901 |
Suleiman Abuhasanein1,2, Carl Hansen3, Dragan Vojinovic3, Staffan Jahnson4, Henrik Leonhardt5,6, Henrik Kjölhede7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-urography (CTU) to rule out urinary bladder cancer (UBC) and whether patients thereby could omit cystoscopy.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Computed tomography (CT); Diagnostic accuracy; Early detection of cancer; Hematuria; Urography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35413901 PMCID: PMC9006563 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01009-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.264
Fig. 1STARD flow diagram showing inclusion of patients in the study for blinded evaluation of computed tomography urography with cortico-medullary phase. STARD: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies; UBC: Urinary bladder cancer
Descriptive parameters of all patients included in the study
| Variable name | All | Control group | Cancer group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.patients | 297 | 90 | 207 | |
| Sex | Male | 207 (70) | 56 (62) | 151 (73) |
| Age | Mean (SD) | 72 (11) | 68 (12) | 74 (9) |
| CTU | Four phases | 290 (98) | 88 (98) | 202 (98) |
| Filling volume | Good/very good | 285 (96) | 88 (98) | 197 (95) |
| Indwelling catheter | 26 [9] | 8 [9] | 18 [9] | |
| Bladder stones | 13 [4] | 8 [9] | 5 [2] | |
| Thick bladder wall | 38 [13] | 8 [9] | 30 [14] | |
| Other image distortions | 69 (23) | 12 [13] | 57 (28) | |
| General quality of CTU | Good/very good | 283 (95) | 88 (98) | 195 (94) |
| Solitary tumor* | – | 133 (66) | ||
| Size of tumor** | 0–10 mm | – | 23 [11] | |
| 11–30 mm | – | 99 (48) | ||
| > 30 mm | – | 52 (25) | ||
| Local tumor stage*** | cTaG1 | – | 22 [11] | |
| cTaG2 | – | 83 (40) | ||
| cTaG3 | – | 10 [5] | ||
| cT1G1 | – | 1 (0.5) | ||
| cT1G2 | – | 20 (9.5) | ||
| cT1G3 | – | 31 [15] | ||
| cT2 | – | 40 [19] | ||
| Concomitant Cis**** | cTaG3 + Cis | – | 4 (33) | |
| cT1 + Cis | – | 5 (42) | ||
| cT2 + Cis | – | 3 (25) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | – | 5 [2] | ||
| Distant metastasis | – | 2 [1] |
Figures represent number of patients (% of numbers of the column) if not otherwise indicated
Cis: Carcinoma in situ; CTU: Computed tomography-urography; SD: Standard deviation
*According to TURBT reports
**Missing cases 33
***Corrected after second look resection if appropriate
****There was no primary cTis
Fig. 2Urinary bladder cancer attenuation in a coronal computed tomography urography reconstruction in: a unenhanced phase, b corticomedullary phase (CMP), c nephrographic phase, and d excretory phase. Notice that the tumor is clearly seen in CMP due to good enhancement and it is hidden in the not optimal contrast-mixed urine in the bladder in (d), sometimes happening despite efforts to get high concentration and volume of contrast in the bladder
Diagnostic accuracy of CTU for the detection of bladder cancer from both reviewers and their consensus
| Consensus | Reviewer 1 | Reviewer 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | Control | Cancer | Control | Cancer | Control | |
| Positive, n | 173 | 1 | 170 | 1 | 154 | 0 |
| Indeterminate, n | 19 | 27 | 20 | 27 | 33 | 28 |
| Negative, n | 15 | 62 | 17 | 62 | 20 | 62 |
| FNR | 0.07 (0.04–0.12) | 0.08 (0.05–0.13) | 0.10 (0.06–0.15) | |||
| FPR | 0.01 (0.00–0.07) | 0.01 (0.00–0.07) | 0.00 (0.00–0.05) | |||
| NPV* | 0.99 (0.92–1.00) | 0.98 (0.92–1.00) | 0.98 (0.92–1.00) | |||
| PPV* | 0.91 (0.86–0.95) | 0.91 (0.86–0.95) | 1.00 (0.97–1.00) | |||
Confidence intervals (95%) in parentheses
CTU: Computed tomography-urography; FNR: False negative rate; FPR: False positive rate; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value
*Values were calculated for the entire cohort of 2195 patients with a cancer prevalence of 12% and after matched exclusions
Descriptive parameters of the patients with missed tumors grouped by the consensus interpretations (indeterminate or negative CTUs)
| Indeterminate | Negative | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No.patients | 19 | 15 | |
| Age (years) | Mean (SD) | 79 [8] | 69 [13] |
| Male sex | 15 (79) | 10 (67) | |
| Solitary tumor | 9 (50)* | 10 (67) | |
| Size of largest tumor** | 0–10 mm | 2 [13] | 8 (67) |
| 11–30 mm | 10 (62) | 3 (25) | |
| > 30 mm | 4 (25) | 1 [8] | |
| Local tumor stage | cTaG1 | 4 [21] | 6 (40) |
| cTaG2 | 6 (31) | 6 (40) | |
| cTaG3 | 3 [16] | 0 (0) | |
| cT1G1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| cT1G2 | 0 (0) | 1 (6.5) | |
| cT1G3 | 3 [16] | 1 (6.5) | |
| cT2 | 3 [16] | 1 [7] | |
| Concomitant Cis | 3 [16] | 0 (0) |
Figures represent number of patients (% of tumors within the group) if not otherwise indicated
Cis: Carcinoma in situ; SD: Standard deviation
*One case was missing
**Missing cases are 3 in every group
Fig. 3A flat (sessile) 3 cm T1G2 tumor in the urinary bladder which was missed in a computed tomography urography with high quality. An axial reconstruction in: a unenhanced phase, b corticomedullary phase (CMP), c nephrographic phase, and d excretory phase