Literature DB >> 16879676

Computed tomography urography for diagnosing bladder cancer.

Benjamin W Turney1, Jonathan M G Willatt, David Nixon, Jeremy P Crew, Nigel C Cowan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of computed tomography urography (CTU) for diagnosing bladder tumours in patients with macroscopic haematuria and aged >40 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 200 consecutive patients attending a fast-track haematuria clinic were assessed using 'same-day' CTU and flexible cystoscopy. Patients were aged >40 years and had macroscopic haematuria with no urine infection. CTU studies were reported by one uroradiologist and scored on a 3-point scale to quantify the probability of bladder cancer. All flexible cystoscopies were performed by the same cystoscopist with no knowledge of the findings of CTU, and scored using a 3-point scale. Cystoscopy, pathological findings and CTU were then compared.
RESULTS: The prevalence of bladder tumours was 24%; when CTU was compared with the histopathological findings, there was one false-positive and three false-negative diagnoses, indicating a sensitivity of 0.93 and a specificity of 0.99, with a 0.98 positive and 0.97 negative predictive value for detecting bladder cancer. A review of the three false-negative cases showed that one was missed on original CTU reporting, the second had the appearance of prostate cancer on CTU and the third was a squamous metaplasia.
CONCLUSION: CTU is an accurate method of detecting bladder tumours in the present patients, and is reliable and accurate for assessing the bladder. Our results support the use of CTU as a first-line screening tool for this high-risk group, the use of which will obviate the need for flexible cystoscopy in patients with a negative CTU and allow those with an obvious tumour to be referred directly for rigid cystoscopy and resection. The remaining patients should be referred for flexible cystoscopy. Such a pathway would accelerate patient assessment by using fewer tests and provide a true 'one-stop' clinic, allowing a comprehensive evaluation with a single test for the upper and lower urinary tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16879676     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06216.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

1.  CUA guidelines on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Samer L Traboulsi; Girish S Kulkarni; Rodney H Breau; Alexandre Zlotta; Andrew Fairey; Alan So; Louis Lacombe; Ricardo Rendon; Armen G Aprikian; D Robert Siemens; Jonathan I Izawa; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  CT urography: the end of IVU?

Authors:  F Stacul; A Rossi; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Comparison of post contrast CT urography phases in bladder cancer detection.

Authors:  Malin Helenius; Par Dahlman; Maria Lonnemark; Einar Brekkan; Lisa Wernroth; Anders Magnusson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Advances in medical imaging for the diagnosis and management of common genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  C Nicolau; L Bunesch; L Peri; R Salvador; J M Corral; C Mallofre; C Sebastia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  CT urography for hematuria.

Authors:  Nigel C Cowan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Diagnostic utility of axial imaging in the evaluation of hematuria: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; Rashid K Sayyid; Roni Manyevitch; Nathan Perlis; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Neil E Fleshner; Martha K Terris; Matthew E Nielsen; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice.

Authors:  Aart J Van Der Molen; Nigel C Cowan; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Claus C A Nolte-Ernsting; Satoru Takahashi; Richard H Cohan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Detection of bladder cancer: comparison of low-dose scans with AIDR 3D and routine-dose scans with FBP on the excretory phase in CT urography.

Authors:  Hiroshi Juri; Takahiro Tsuboyama; Seishi Kumano; Yuki Inada; Mitsuhiro Koyama; Haruhito Azuma; Yoshifumi Narumi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Staging of transitional cell carcinoma: Has anything changed?

Authors:  J N Kulkarni; G K Bakshi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.