Literature DB >> 28677000

Bladder cancer diagnosis with CT urography: test characteristics and reasons for false-positive and false-negative results.

Tony W Trinh1, Daniel I Glazer2, Cheryl A Sadow2, V Anik Sahni2, Nina L Geller2, Stuart G Silverman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine test characteristics of CT urography for detecting bladder cancer in patients with hematuria and those undergoing surveillance, and to analyze reasons for false-positive and false-negative results.
METHODS: A HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved retrospective review of reports from 1623 CT urograms between 10/2010 and 12/31/2013 was performed. 710 examinations for hematuria or bladder cancer history were compared to cystoscopy performed within 6 months. Reference standard was surgical pathology or 1-year minimum clinical follow-up. False-positive and false-negative examinations were reviewed to determine reasons for errors.
RESULTS: Ninety-five bladder cancers were detected. CT urography accuracy: was 91.5% (650/710), sensitivity 86.3% (82/95), specificity 92.4% (568/615), positive predictive value 63.6% (82/129), and negative predictive value was 97.8% (568/581). Of 43 false positives, the majority of interpretation errors were due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 12), trabeculated bladder (n = 9), and treatment changes (n = 8). Other causes include blood clots, mistaken normal anatomy, infectious/inflammatory changes, or had no cystoscopic correlate. Of 13 false negatives, 11 were due to technique, one to a large urinary residual, one to artifact. There were no errors in perception.
CONCLUSION: CT urography is an accurate test for diagnosing bladder cancer; however, in protocols relying predominantly on excretory phase images, overall sensitivity remains insufficient to obviate cystoscopy. Awareness of bladder cancer mimics may reduce false-positive results. Improvements in CTU technique may reduce false-negative results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; CT urography; False negative; False positive; Performance characteristics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28677000     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1249-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  10 in total

1.  Making sense of the CT Urogram.

Authors:  Hiram Shaish
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongyu Jin; Tianhai Lin; Ping Han; Yijun Yao; Danxi Zheng; Jianqi Hao; Yiqing Hu; Rui Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  The Role of Imaging in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Staging.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Kristin K Porter; Constantine Burgan; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

4.  The performance of the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor Test and voided urinary cytology in the follow-up of urinary bladder tumors.

Authors:  Tomaz Smrkolj; Urska Cegovnik Primozic; Teja Fabjan; Sasa Sterpin; Josko Osredkar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  The human TRAM1 locus expresses circular RNAs.

Authors:  Josephine Dubois; Georg Sczakiel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Usefulness of advanced monoenergetic reconstruction technique in dual-energy computed tomography for detecting bladder cancer.

Authors:  Motoo Nakagawa; Taku Naiki; Aya Naiki-Ito; Yoshiyuki Ozawa; Masashi Shimohira; Masahiro Ohnishi; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Computed tomography urography with corticomedullary phase can exclude urinary bladder cancer with high accuracy.

Authors:  Suleiman Abuhasanein; Carl Hansen; Dragan Vojinovic; Staffan Jahnson; Henrik Leonhardt; Henrik Kjölhede
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 8.  [Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Radiologic Perspective].

Authors:  Dong Won Kim; Seong Kuk Yoon; Sang Hyeon Kim
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-09-15

9.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

Review 10.  Imaging and Management of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo K Wong; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Corey T Jensen; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.