Literature DB >> 25793362

Bladder cancer detection in patients with gross haematuria: Computed tomography urography with enhancement-triggered scan versus flexible cystoscopy.

Malin Helenius1, Einar Brekkan2, Pär Dahlman1, Maria Lönnemark1, Anders Magnusson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography urography (CTU) can be used to direct further investigation of patients if the bladder tumour detection rate is high. The aim of this study was to compare a CTU protocol including an enhancement-triggered scan and flexible cystoscopy for detecting bladder tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with gross haematuria undergoing CTU during 2005-2008 were included. For patients younger than 50 years the CTU protocol included unenhanced, enhancement-triggered corticomedullary, and excretory phases. Patients older than 50 years followed the same protocol plus a nephrographic phase. The entire urinary tract was examined in all phases.
RESULTS: Of 435 patients, 55 patients were diagnosed with bladder tumour. CTU detected bladder tumour in 48 patients (87%). Five CTU examination reports were false positive. With CTU, sensitivity for finding bladder tumour was 0.87, specificity 0.99, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.91 and negative predictive value (NPV) 0.98. Cystoscopy detected bladder tumour in 48 patients (87%) and had one false-positive finding, resulting in sensitivity of 0.87, specificity 1.0, PPV 0.98 and NPV 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of bladder tumours for the CTU protocol including an enhancement-triggered scan was high and comparable to flexible cystoscopy. Hence, this protocol could be used to assess the bladder as the primary investigation and direct further investigation of the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystoscopy; haematuria; multidetector computed tomography; urinary bladder neoplasms; urography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25793362     DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2015.1026937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of Common Diagnostic Approaches for Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria.

Authors:  Joshua A Halpern; Bilal Chughtai; Hassan Ghomrawi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 2.  Diagnostic utility of axial imaging in the evaluation of hematuria: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; Rashid K Sayyid; Roni Manyevitch; Nathan Perlis; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Neil E Fleshner; Martha K Terris; Matthew E Nielsen; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Imaging in Localized Bladder Cancer: Can Current Diagnostic Modalities Provide Accurate Local Tumor Staging?

Authors:  Sandeep Gurram; Akhil Muthigi; Jillian Egan; Lambros Stamatakis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer, is it time to replace biopsy?

Authors:  Rima S Al Johi; Gehan S Seifeldein; Ahmed M Moeen; Noha A Aboulhagag; Ehab M Moussa; Diaa A Hameed; Hisham M Imam
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-01-16

5.  Identification of Cancer-Specific Methylation of Gene Combination for the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Siteng Chen; Lingfeng Wu; Yishuo Wu; Guangliang Jiang; Jialiang Shao; Lixin Chen; Jishan Sun; Rong Na; Xiang Wang; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  The Role of Imaging in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Staging.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Kristin K Porter; Constantine Burgan; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

7.  Computed tomography urography with corticomedullary phase can exclude urinary bladder cancer with high accuracy.

Authors:  Suleiman Abuhasanein; Carl Hansen; Dragan Vojinovic; Staffan Jahnson; Henrik Leonhardt; Henrik Kjölhede
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  A glance at imaging bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ebru Salmanoglu; Ethan Halpern; Edouard J Trabulsi; Sung Kim; Mathew L Thakur
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16

9.  Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mi Ah Han; Philipp Maisch; Jae Hung Jung; Jun Eul Hwang; Vikram Narayan; Anne Cleves; Eu Chang Hwang; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 10.  Steroid Hormone Receptor Signals as Prognosticators for Urothelial Tumor.

Authors:  Hiroki Ide; Hiroshi Miyamoto
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.