| Literature DB >> 35410070 |
Beatrice Vincenti1, Enrico Paris1, Monica Carnevale1, Adriano Palma1, Ettore Guerriero2, Domenico Borello3, Valerio Paolini2, Francesco Gallucci1.
Abstract
The adverse effects of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) on health and ecosystems, as well as on meteorology and climate change, are well known to the scientific community. It is therefore undeniable that a good understanding of the sources of PM is crucial for effective control of emissions and to protect public health. One of the major contributions to atmospheric PM is biomass burning, a practice used both in agriculture and home heating, which can be traced and identified by analyzing sugars emitted from the combustion of cellulose and hemicellulose that make up biomass. In this review comparing almost 200 selected articles, we highlight the most recent studies that broaden such category of tracers, covering research publications on residential wood combustions, open-fire or combustion chamber burnings and ambient PM in different regions of Asia, America and Europe. The purpose of the present work is to collect data in the literature that indicate a direct correspondence between biomass burning and saccharides emitted into the atmosphere with regard to distinguishing common sugars attributed to biomass burning from those that have co-causes of issue. In this paper, we provide a list of 24 compounds, including those most commonly recognized as biomass burning tracers (i.e., levoglucosan, mannosan and galactosan), from which it emerges that monosaccharide anhydrides, sugar alcohols and primary sugars have been widely reported as organic tracers for biomass combustion, although it has also been shown that emissions of these compounds depend not only on combustion characteristics and equipment but also on fuel type, combustion quality and weather conditions. Although it appears that it is currently not possible to define a single compound as a universal indicator of biomass combustion, this review provides a valuable tool for the collection of information in the literature and identifies analytes that can lead to the determination of patterns for the distribution between PM generated by biomass combustion.Entities:
Keywords: PM; anhydrosugars; biomass burning; saccharides; sugar alcohols; tracers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35410070 PMCID: PMC8998709 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart describing the literature research and article selection.
Source apportionment studies most used in the evaluation of saccharide compounds present in airborne particulate matter.
| Compound | Source | SA Study | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
|
| |||
|
| biomass burning | PCA | [ |
| fungal spores | PMF | [ | |
| plants | PMF | ||
| soil dust | [ | ||
|
| pollen | PMF | [ |
| yeasts, fungal spores | PMF | [ | |
| fungal spores | PCA | [ | |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
|
| yeasts, fungal spores | PMF | [ |
| fungal spores | PCA | [ | |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
| plants, soil | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
| fungal spores | PCA | [ | |
| plants, biota | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| soil | PCA | [ | |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PCA | [ |
| plants, biota | PCA | [ | |
| biomass burning | PMF | [ | |
|
| plants, biota | PCA | [ |
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| plants | PMF | [ | |
|
| plants | PMF | [ |
|
| |||
|
| pollen, pollen, fruits, | PMF | [ |
| fungal spores | PCA | [ | |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
| soil, biota | PMF | [ | |
|
| pollen fruits, plants | PMF | [ |
| fungal spores | PCA | [ | |
| soil | PMF | [ | |
| plants | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PMF | [ |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
|
| biomass burning | PCA | [ |
|
| soil, biota | PCA | [ |
|
| biomass burning | PCA | [ |
| plants | PCA | [ | |
|
| |||
|
| biomass burning | PCA | [ |
| plants | PCA | [ | |
|
| plants, pollen, fruits | PMF | [ |
| plants | PCA | [ | |
| pollen | PCA | [ | |
| fungal spores | PCA | [ | |
| soil, biota | PMF | [ | |
|
| yeasts, fungal spores | PCA | [ |
| soil biota | PCA | [ | |
| biomass burning | PCA | [ | |
| plants | PMF | [ | |
| soil dust | PMF | [ | |
| soil dust | PCA | [ | |
Figure 2Chemical structures of saccharide compounds detected in atmospheric monitoring studies.
Figure 3Most utilized techniques found in the literature for sugar compound determination in PM aerosol analysis (based on data from Supplementary Materials Table S1).
Saccharide compounds detected in aerosols emitted from tree and herbaceous biomass by means of different combustion appliances.
| Biomass | Saccharides Detected | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tree Biomass | Anhydrosugars | Sugar Alcohols | Mono- and Disaccharides | Units | Appliance | Ref. | |||||||||
|
| L | M | G | I-ol | A-ol | M-ol | E-ol | S-ol | G-ose | F-ose | M-ose | S-ose | |||
| Blue gum, Australian blackwood | 13.4 | 7.59 | 5.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 74.6 (µg/g) | mg/g | Wildfire | [ |
| Blue gum, Australian blackwood | 12.8 | 5.65 | 2.8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Wildfire | [ |
| Acacia pellet | 284 | 24.2 | 10.4 | - | 4.27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | µg/g | Stove | [ |
| Apple tree branch | 3.44 | 0.22 | 0.18 | <LOD | 0.18 | 0.22 | - | - | <LOD | - | - | 0.08 | mg/kg | Stove | [ |
| Wood branch | 5.46 | 0.36 | 0.29 | <LOD | 0.29 | <LOD | - | - | <LOD | - | - | 0.13 | mg/kg | Stove | [ |
| Pear and walnut wood and leaves | 2.12 | 0.412 | 1.45 | - | 0.138 | <0.005 | - | 0.23 | - | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | % of total mass | Open air combustion | [ |
| Pear and walnut wood and leaves | 2.14 | 0.36 | 1.93 | - | 0.14 | 0.008 | - | 0.27 | - | <0.01 | 0.017 | <0.02 | % of total mass | Open air combustion | [ |
| Red maple | 213.16 | 11.06 | 3.97 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Stove | [ |
| Sugar maple | 210.07 | 12.88 | 2.55 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Stove | [ |
| White oak | 125.14 | 5.51 | 6.55 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Stove | [ |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Douglas fir | 408.8 | 117.65 | 24.17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Stove | [ |
| Pine trees | 13.9 | 8.4 | 6.21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Wildfire | [ |
| Pine trees | 9.65 | 5.65 | 4.23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Wildfire | [ |
| Loblolly pine | 253.11 | 46.33 | 11.45 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | Stove | [ |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Brooms, brambles | 13.9 | 8.4 | 6.21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | mg/g | wildfire | [ |
| Rice straw | 112 | 3.14 | - | 2.23 | 2.79 | 1.84 | 0.8 | - | 2.59 | - | 5.76 | - | mg/kg | combustion chamber | [ |
| Maize residues | 33.5 | 1.27 | - | 1.7 | 1.59 | 1.23 | 0.59 | - | 1.14 | - | 2.22 | - | mg/kg | combustion chamber | [ |
| Leaf litter (ddf) | 196 | 11 | - | 2.65 | 5.14 | 1.97 | 1.41 | - | 1.72 | - | 16.4 | - | mg/kg | combustion chamber | [ |
| Wheat straw | 96.4 | 2.12 | 1.97 | <LOD | 0.21 | 0.11 | - | - | 0.56 | - | - | <LOD | mg/kg | Stove | [ |
| Wheat straw, corn straw | 0.23 | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | µg/m3 | Stove | [ |
| Wheat straw, corn straw | 0.59 | 0.06 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | µg/m3 | Stove | [ |
Abbreviation used: “L” = levoglucosan; “M” = mannosan; “G” = galactosan; “I-ol” = inositol; “A-ol” = arabitol; “M-ol” = mannitol; “E-ol” = erythritol; “S-ol” = sorbitol; “G-ose” = glucose; “F-ose” = fructose; “M-ose” = mannose; “S-ose” = sucrose; “LOD” = limit of detection; “-” = not detected or not specified.