Literature DB >> 17195486

Is levoglucosan a suitable quantitative tracer for wood burning? Comparison with receptor modeling on trace elements in Lycksele, Sweden.

Emma Hedberg1, Christer Johansson, Linda Johansson, Erik Swietlicki, Eva Brorström-Lundén.   

Abstract

Particle emissions from residential wood combustion in small communities in Northern Sweden can sometimes increase the ambient particle concentrations to levels comparable to densely trafficked streets in the center of large cities. The reason for this is the combination of increased need for domestic heating during periods of low temperatures, leading to higher emission rates, and stable meteorological conditions. In this work, the authors compare two different approaches to quantify the wood combustion contribution to fine particles in Northern Sweden: a multivariate source-receptor analysis on inorganic compounds followed by multiple linear regression (MLR) of fine particle concentrations and levoglucosan used as a tracer. From the receptor model, it can be seen that residential wood combustion corresponds with 70% of modeled particle mass. Smaller contributions are also seen from local nonexhaust traffic particles, road dust, and brake wear (each contributing 14%). Of the mass, 1.5% is explained by long-distance transported particles, and 2% derives from a regional source deriving from either oil combustion or smelter activities. In samples collected in ambient air, a significant linear correlation was found between wood burning particles and levoglucosan. The levoglucosan fraction in the ambient fine particulate matter attributed to wood burning according to the multivariate analysis ranged from < 2% to 50%. This is much higher than the fraction found in the emission from the boilers expected to be responsible for most emissions at this site (between 3% and 6%). A laboratory emission study of wood and pellet boilers gave 0.3% wt to 22% wt levoglucosan to particle mass, indicating that the levoglucosan fraction may be highly dependent on combustion conditions, making it uncertain to use it as a quantitative tracer under real-world burning conditions. Thus, quantitative estimates of wood burning contributions will be very uncertain using solely levoglucosan as a tracer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17195486     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  5 in total

1.  Estimation of local and external contributions of biomass burning to PM2.5 in an industrial zone included in a large urban settlement.

Authors:  Francesca Benetello; Stefania Squizzato; Angelika Hofer; Mauro Masiol; Md Badiuzzaman Khan; Andrea Piazzalunga; Paola Fermo; Gian Maria Formenton; Giancarlo Rampazzo; Bruno Pavoni
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Urinary levoglucosan as a biomarker of wood smoke: results of human exposure studies.

Authors:  Megan A Bergauff; Tony J Ward; Curtis W Noonan; Christopher T Migliaccio; Christopher D Simpson; Ashley R Evanoski; Christopher P Palmer
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Short-term chamber exposure to low doses of two kinds of wood smoke does not induce systemic inflammation, coagulation or oxidative stress in healthy humans.

Authors:  Leo Stockfelt; Gerd Sallsten; Pernilla Almerud; Samar Basu; Lars Barregard
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Saccharides as Particulate Matter Tracers of Biomass Burning: A Review.

Authors:  Beatrice Vincenti; Enrico Paris; Monica Carnevale; Adriano Palma; Ettore Guerriero; Domenico Borello; Valerio Paolini; Francesco Gallucci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Urinary levoglucosan as a biomarker of wood smoke exposure: observations in a mouse model and in children.

Authors:  Christopher T Migliaccio; Megan A Bergauff; Christopher P Palmer; Forrest Jessop; Curtis W Noonan; Tony J Ward
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.