Literature DB >> 30172931

Impact of air pollution control policies on future PM2.5 concentrations and their source contributions in China.

Siyi Cai1, Qiao Ma2, Shuxiao Wang3, Bin Zhao4, Michael Brauer5, Aaron Cohen6, Randall V Martin7, Qianqian Zhang8, Qinbin Li4, Yuxuan Wang9, Jiming Hao10, Joseph Frostad11, Mohammad H Forouzanfar11, Richard T Burnett12.   

Abstract

To investigate the impact of air pollutant control policies on future PM2.5 concentrations and their source contributions in China, we developed four future scenarios for 2030 based on a 2013 emission inventory, and conducted air quality simulations for each scenario using the chemical transport model GEOS-Chem (version 9.1.3). Two energy scenarios i.e., current legislation (CLE) and with additional measures (WAM), were developed to project future energy consumption, reflecting, respectively, existing legislation and implementation status as of the end of 2012, and new energy-saving policies that would be released and enforced more stringently. Two end-of-pipe control strategies, i.e., current control technologies (until 2017) and more stringent control technologies (until 2030), were also developed. The combinations of energy scenarios and end-of-pipe control strategies constitute four emission scenarios (2017-CLE, 2030-CLE, 2017-WAM, and 2030-WAM) evaluated in simulations. PM2.5 concentrations at national level were estimated to be 57 μg/m3 in the base year 2013, and 58 μg/m3, 42 μg/m3, 42 μg/m3, and 30 μg/m3 under the 2017-CLE, 2030-CLE, 2017-WAM, and 2030-WAM scenarios in 2030, respectively. Large PM2.5 reductions between 2013 and 2030 were estimated for heavily polluted regions (Sichuan Basin, Middle Yangtze River, North China). The energy-saving policies show similar effects to the end-of-pipe emission control measures, but the relative importance of these two groups of policies varies in different regions. Absolute contributions to PM2.5 concentrations from most major sources declined from 2017-CLE to 2030-WAM. With respect to fractional contributions, most coal-burning sectors (including power plant, industrial and residential coal burning) increased from 2017-CLE to 2030-WAM, due to larger reductions from non-coal sources, including transportation and biomass open burning. Residential combustion and open burning had much lower fractional contribution to ambient PM2.5 concentrations in the 2017-WAM/2030-WAM compared to the 2017-CLE/2030-CLE scenarios. Fractional contributions from transportation were reduced dramatically in 2030-CLE and 2030-WAM compared to 2017-CLE/2017-WAM, due to the enforcement of stringent end-of-pipe emission controls. Across all scenarios, coal combustion remained the single largest contributor to PM2.5 concentrations in 2030. Reducing PM2.5 emissions from coal combustion remains a strategic priority for air quality management in China.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Emission scenario; GEOS-Chem simulation; PM(2.5) concentration; Source contribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30172931     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  Effects of air pollution control measures on air quality improvement in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Meifang Yu; Yun Zhu; Che-Jen Lin; Shuxiao Wang; Jia Xing; Carey Jang; Jizhang Huang; Jinying Huang; Jiangbo Jin; Lian Yu
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Implications of Mitigating Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter Pollution in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area of China Using a Regional-To-Local Coupling Model.

Authors:  Xuguo Zhang; Jenny Stocker; Kate Johnson; Yik Him Fung; Teng Yao; Christina Hood; David Carruthers; Jimmy C H Fung
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  Pathways of China's PM2.5 air quality 2015-2060 in the context of carbon neutrality.

Authors:  Jing Cheng; Dan Tong; Qiang Zhang; Yang Liu; Yu Lei; Gang Yan; Liu Yan; Sha Yu; Ryna Yiyun Cui; Leon Clarke; Guannan Geng; Bo Zheng; Xiaoye Zhang; Steven J Davis; Kebin He
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 17.275

Review 4.  Saccharides as Particulate Matter Tracers of Biomass Burning: A Review.

Authors:  Beatrice Vincenti; Enrico Paris; Monica Carnevale; Adriano Palma; Ettore Guerriero; Domenico Borello; Valerio Paolini; Francesco Gallucci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Visualization and Analysis of Air Pollution and Human Health Based on Cluster Analysis: A Bibliometric Review from 2001 to 2021.

Authors:  Diyi Liu; Kun Cheng; Kevin Huang; Hui Ding; Tiantong Xu; Zhenni Chen; Yanqi Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  The assessment of two different pollutants dispersion from a coal-fired power plant for various thermal regimes.

Authors:  Alibek Issakhov; Albina Mashenkova
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-05-03

7.  Ship Emission Impacts on Air Quality and Human Health in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) Region, China, in 2015, With Projections to 2030.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Eri Saikawa; Bryan Comer; Xiaoli Mao; Dan Rutherford
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2019-09-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.