Literature DB >> 26756961

Review of receptor modeling methods for source apportionment.

Philip K Hopke1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Efforts have been made to relate measured concentrations of airborne constituents to their origins for more than 50 years. During this time interval, there have been developments in the measurement technology to gather highly time-resolved, detailed chemical compositional data. Similarly, the improvements in computers have permitted a parallel development of data analysis tools that permit the extraction of information from these data. There is now a substantial capability to provide useful insights into the sources of pollutants and their atmospheric processing that can help inform air quality management options. Efforts have been made to combine receptor and chemical transport models to provide improved apportionments. Tools are available to utilize limited numbers of known profiles with the ambient data to obtain more accurate apportionments for targeted sources. In addition, tools are in place to allow more advanced models to be fitted to the data based on conceptual models of the nature of the sources and the sampling/analytical approach. Each of the approaches has its strengths and weaknesses. However, the field as a whole suffers from a lack of measurements of source emission compositions. There has not been an active effort to develop source profiles for stationary sources for a long time, and with many significant sources built in developing countries, the lack of local profiles is a serious problem in effective source apportionment. The field is now relatively mature in terms of its methods and its ability to adapt to new measurement technologies, so that we can be assured of a high likelihood of extracting the maximal information from the collected data. IMPLICATIONS: Efforts have been made over the past 50 years to use air quality data to estimate the influence of air pollution sources. These methods are now relatively mature and many are readily accessible through publically available software. This review examines the development of receptor models and the current state of the art in extracting source identification and apportionments from ambient air quality data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756961     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1140693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  21 in total

1.  Pilot study investigating ambient air toxics emissions near a Canadian kraft pulp and paper facility in Pictou County, Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Emma Hoffman; Judith R Guernsey; Tony R Walker; Jong Sung Kim; Kate Sherren; Pantelis Andreou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Recent Approaches to Estimate Associations Between Source-Specific Air Pollution and Health.

Authors:  Jenna R Krall; Matthew J Strickland
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

3.  Source apportionments of PM2.5 organic carbon during the elevated pollution episodes in the Ordos region, Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  Reza Bashiri Khuzestani; James J Schauer; Jing Shang; Tianqi Cai; Dongqing Fang; Yongjie Wei; Lulu Zhang; Yuanxun Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Characterizing population exposure to coal emissions sources in the United States using the HyADS model.

Authors:  Lucas R F Henneman; Christine Choirat; Cesunica Ivey; Kevin Cummiskey; Corwin M Zigler
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Sources of pollution and interrelationships between aerosol and precipitation chemistry at a central California site.

Authors:  Hossein Dadashazar; Lin Ma; Armin Sorooshian
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Triggering of cardiovascular hospital admissions by source specific fine particle concentrations in urban centers of New York State.

Authors:  David Q Rich; Wangjian Zhang; Shao Lin; Stefania Squizzato; Sally W Thurston; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Daniel Croft; Mauro Masiol; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter during the Day and Night in Lanzhou, NW China.

Authors:  Mei Zhang; Jia Jia; Bo Wang; Weihong Zhang; Chenming Gu; Xiaochen Zhang; Yuanhao Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Unmix Optimum analysis of PAH sediment sources.

Authors:  Gary A Norris; Ronald C Henry
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Source Apportionment of Environmental Combustion Sources using Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jay W Rutherford; Timothy Larson; Timothy Gould; Edmund Seto; Igor V Novosselov; Jonathan D Posner
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 5.755

10.  Neurodegenerative hospital admissions and long-term exposure to ambient fine particle air pollution.

Authors:  Edwin van Wijngaarden; David Q Rich; Wangjian Zhang; Sally W Thurston; Shao Lin; Daniel P Croft; Stefania Squizzato; Mauro Masiol; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.