| Literature DB >> 35407011 |
Hongli Ye1,2, Yinfeng Xi1,2, Liangliang Tian1,2, Dongmei Huang1, Xuanyun Huang1, Xiaosheng Shen1, Youqiong Cai1,2, Yuan Wangs1,2.
Abstract
Tetrodotoxin (TTX) was simultaneously detected in the fresh and heat-processed aquatic products by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The detection conditions were investigated, including the chromatography column and mobile phase. Based on the optimized parameters, a sensitive determination method of TTX was established. The proposed method featured the merits of a good linear relationship between signal and TTX concentration (R2 = 0.9998), a wide detection matrix-based range of 0.2-100 ng/g, and a low detection limit of 0.2 ng/g, etc. The spiked assays evidenced its accuracy and reliability with recoveries of 90.5-107.2%. Finally, the developed method was simultaneously successfully applied in the determination of TTX in various fresh and heat-processed aquatic products.Entities:
Keywords: Takifugu; heat-processed Gadus; high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; simultaneous determination; tetrodotoxin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407011 PMCID: PMC8997983 DOI: 10.3390/foods11070925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Gradient elution program of the target analytes.
| Time/min | Mobile Phase A/% | Mobile Phase B/% | Hold Time/min |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 75 | 1.00 |
| 1.0 | 25 | 75 | 0.10 |
| 1.1 | 95 | 5 | 2.90 |
| 4.0 | 95 | 5 | 0.10 |
| 4.1 | 25 | 75 | 4.90 |
Figure 1The chromatographic peaks (A) intensity and (B) area of the 320.2 > 302.2 m/z ion fragment detected by the BEH amide column and TSK amide column with a TTX concentration of 25 ng/mL.
Figure 2The chromatographic peaks (A) intensity and (B) area of the 320.2 > 302.2 m/z ion fragment detected by the BEH amide column taking 0.1% FA aqueous, 0.1% FA+ 2 mM AMA aqueous, 0.1% FA + 5 mM AMA aqueous as the mobile phase, respectively, with TTX the concentration of 25 ng/mL.
Linear ranges, calibration curves, R2, LOD, LOQ, and ME of the developed method.
| Matrix | LR (ng/g) | CV | R2 | LOD (ng/g) | LOQ (ng/g) | Repeatability (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 0.2–100 | y = −5007.64 + 13988.30x | 0.9998 | - | - | - | - |
|
| y = −3549.34 + 11416.6x | 0.9992 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 18.3 | 5.79 | |
| Heat-processed | y = −2230.15 + 14082.1x | 0.9992 | 0.2 | 0.5 | −0.671 | 7.57 |
Comparison of the TTX determination based on the proposed method with the previously reported literature using HPLC-MS/MS method.
| Linear Range | LOD | Matrix | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | 3 ng/g | mangrove horseshoe crab | [ |
| 1.56–100 ng/mL | 1.56 ng/g | shellfish | [ |
| 3–25,800 ng/g | 6.245 ng/g | mussel | [ |
| 10–1000 ng/g | 2.3 ng/g | pufferfish muscle | [ |
| 50–37,500 ng/g | 410 ng/g | puffer fish | [ |
| - | 41 ng/g | mackerel fish extracts | [ |
| 0.2–100 ng/g | 0.2 ng/g | pufferfish and high-processed | This work |
The determination of TTX in T. obscurus and heat-processed Gadus based on the established method.
| Samples | Initial Amount (ng/g) | Spiked (ng/g) | Measured Average (ng/g) | Recovery (%) | Precision (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N.D. | 0.5 | 0.536 | 107.2 | 3.92 | |
| N.D. | 2.5 | 2.657 | 106.3 | 2.45 | |
| N.D. | 10.0 | 9.953 | 99.5 | 6.16 | |
| N.D. | 0.5 | 0.453 | 90.5 | 1.60 | |
| N.D. | 2.5 | 2.373 | 94.9 | 2.40 | |
| N.D. | 10.0 | 9.980 | 99.8 | 6.59 | |
| N.D. | 0.5 | 0.517 | 103.4 | 3.36 | |
| N.D. | 2.5 | 2.320 | 92.8 | 3.95 | |
| N.D. | 10.0 | 10.400 | 104.0 | 3.47 | |
| Heat-processed | N.D. | 0.5 | 0.501 | 100.1 | 3.35 |
| N.D. | 2.5 | 2.410 | 96.4 | 2.59 | |
| N.D. | 10.0 | 10.410 | 104.1 | 7.05 |
Determination of TTX in different fresh pufferfishes and heat-processed fish based on the established method.
| Number | Samples | Sampling City | Collection Date | Tissues | Measured * (ng/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Zhangzhou, Fujian Province | 10 January | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| Liver | N.D. | ||||
| 2 |
| Zhangzhou, Fujian Province | 8 April | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | 8.41 (5.71%) | ||||
| 3 |
| Taizhou, Jiangsu Province | 11 May | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 4 |
| Guangzhou, Guangdong Province | 12 June | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| Liver | N.D. | ||||
| 5 |
| Dongguan, Guangdong Province | 12 June | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| Liver | N.D. | ||||
| 6 |
| Dongguan, Guangdong Province | 12 June | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| Liver | N.D. | ||||
| 7 |
| Yangjiang, Guangdong Province | 12 June | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| Liver | N.D. | ||||
| 8 |
| Shanghai | 11 August | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| Liver | N.D. | ||||
| 9 |
| Weihai, Shandong Province | 18 September | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 10 |
| Weihai, Shandong Province | 18 September | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 11 |
| Jiangyin, Jiangsu Province | 11 October | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 12 |
| Jiangyin, Jiangsu Province | 11 October | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 13 |
| Taizhou, Jiangsu Province | 11 October | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 14 |
| Taizhou, Jiangsu Province | 11 October | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 15 |
| Shanghai | 26 November | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. | ||||
| 16 |
| Tangshan, Hebei Province | 3 December | Skin | N.D. |
| Muscle | N.D. |
* N.D.: not found (below LOD) in this work.
Determination of TTX in different heat-processed fishes based on the established method.
| Number | Heat-Processed Fishes | Collection Date | Measured (ng/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 30 May | N.D. |
| 2 |
| 30 May | N.D. |
| 3 |
| 30 May | N.D. |
| 4 |
| 1 June | N.D. |
| 5 |
| 1 June | N.D. |
| 6 |
| 1 June | N.D. |
| 7 |
| 4 June | N.D. |
| 8 |
| 4 June | N.D. |
| 9 |
| 4 June | N.D. |
| 10 |
| 5 June | N.D. |
| 11 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 12 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 13 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 14 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 15 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 16 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 17 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 18 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 19 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 20 |
| 1 August | N.D. |
| 21 |
| 2 August | N.D. |
| 22 |
| 2 August | N.D. |
| 23 |
| 2 August | N.D. |
| 24 |
| 2 August | N.D. |
| 25 |
| 2 August | N.D. |
| 26 |
| 3 August | 219 (1.59%) |
| 27 |
| 3 August | N.D. |
| 28 |
| 3 August | N.D. |