Literature DB >> 20004403

Signal suppression/enhancement in high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Fabio Gosetti1, Eleonora Mazzucco, Davide Zampieri, Maria Carla Gennaro.   

Abstract

The review discusses the pitfalls of the matrix effect in mass spectrometry detection hyphenated to liquid chromatography separation. Matrix effect heavily influences both qualitative and quantitative analyses, giving rise to suppression or enhancement of the signal. As generally recognised, the predominant cause is the presence of undesired components that co-elute in the chromatographic separation and alter the ionisation process. The interfering species can be components of the sample, compounds released during the pre-treatment/extraction process or reagents added to the mobile phase to improve chromatographic resolution. The different mechanisms proposed in literature to explain the suppression or the enhancement of the signal both in electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionisations are presented and the results observed in the different experimental conditions are compared and discussed. All data together lead to conclude that the chemical properties of the target analyte, the kind of matrix, the matrix to analyte concentration ratio, the extraction process, the chromatographic conditions as well as the kind of the mass spectrometry instrumentation and the ionisation conditions can play a role. Likely all these potential causes act in a synergic way and the final effect observed is hardly due to only one of them. Depending on an unpredictable combination of conditions, signal suppression or enhancement can be observed. The review discusses the matrix effects observed in HPLC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS analysis proposes hypotheses to explain the observed behaviours and proposes methods and strategies to overcome the matrix effects. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004403     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  50 in total

1.  Evaluating nonpolar surface area and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry response: an application for site occupancy measurements for enzyme intermediates in polyketide biosynthesis.

Authors:  Shan M Randall; Irina Koryakina; Gavin J Williams; David C Muddiman
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  cCMP and cUMP occur in vivo.

Authors:  Heike Bähre; Christina Hartwig; Antje Munder; Sabine Wolter; Tane Stelzer; Bastian Schirmer; Ulrike Beckert; Dara W Frank; Burkhard Tümmler; Volkhard Kaever; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Determination of glyphosate in surface water with high organic matter content.

Authors:  Vahur Toss; Ivo Leito; Sergei Yurchenko; Rene Freiberg; Anneli Kruve
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  LC-MS/MS in the Clinical Laboratory - Where to From Here?

Authors:  Stefan Kg Grebe; Ravinder J Singh
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2011-02

5.  Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry study of tricyclazole photodegradation products in water.

Authors:  Fabio Gosetti; Ugo Chiuminatto; Eleonora Mazzucco; Rita Mastroianni; Bianca Bolfi; Emilio Marengo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Multi-class determination of pharmaceuticals in wastewaters by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with matrix effect study.

Authors:  Mirta Čizmić; Sandra Babić; Marija Kaštelan-Macan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The Development of Novel Nanodiamond Based MALDI Matrices for the Analysis of Small Organic Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Jackson M Chitanda; Haixia Zhang; Erica Pahl; Randy W Purves; Anas El-Aneed
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 8.  Quantitative mass spectrometry methods for pharmaceutical analysis.

Authors:  Glenn Loos; Ann Van Schepdael; Deirdre Cabooter
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Aspects of matrix and analyte effects in clinical pharmacokinetic sample analyses using LC-ESI/MS/MS - Two case examples.

Authors:  Guohua An; Thanh Bach; Inas Abdallah; Demet Nalbant
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.935

10.  Acetonitrile Ion Suppression in Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kevin Colizza; Keira E Mahoney; Alexander V Yevdokimov; James L Smith; Jimmie C Oxley
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.