Literature DB >> 35401861

Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.

Jiawei Li1,2, Bo Hong3,2, Guido Nolte4, Andreas K Engel4, Dan Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

While human speech comprehension is thought to be an active process that involves top-down predictions, it remains unclear how predictive information is used to prepare for the processing of upcoming speech information. We aimed to identify the neural signatures of the preparatory processing of upcoming speech. Participants selectively attended to one of two competing naturalistic, narrative speech streams, and a temporal response function (TRF) method was applied to derive event-related-like neural responses from electroencephalographic data. The phase responses to the attended speech at the delta band (1-4 Hz) were correlated with the comprehension performance of individual participants, with a latency of - 200-0 ms relative to the onset of speech amplitude envelope fluctuations over the fronto-central and left-lateralized parietal electrodes. The phase responses to the attended speech at the alpha band also correlated with comprehension performance but with a latency of 650-980 ms post-onset over the fronto-central electrodes. Distinct neural signatures were found for the attentional modulation, taking the form of TRF-based amplitude responses at a latency of 240-320 ms post-onset over the left-lateralized fronto-central and occipital electrodes. Our findings reveal how the brain gets prepared to process an upcoming speech in a continuous, naturalistic speech context.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Electroencephalogram; Preparatory processing; Speech comprehension; Temporal response function

Year:  2021        PMID: 35401861      PMCID: PMC8934811          DOI: 10.1007/s11571-021-09711-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn        ISSN: 1871-4080            Impact factor:   5.082


  102 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Naturalistic Stimuli in Neuroscience: Critically Acclaimed.

Authors:  Saurabh Sonkusare; Michael Breakspear; Christine Guo
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing: Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability.

Authors:  Anna Marzecová; Andreas Widmann; Iria SanMiguel; Sonja A Kotz; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; Padraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl Friston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Target Speaker Detection with Concealed EEG Around the Ear.

Authors:  Bojana Mirkovic; Martin G Bleichner; Maarten De Vos; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.