Literature DB >> 28257808

Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing: Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability.

Anna Marzecová1, Andreas Widmann2, Iria SanMiguel3, Sonja A Kotz4, Erich Schröger2.   

Abstract

The potentially interactive influence of attention and prediction was investigated by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) in a spatial cueing task with attention (task-relevant) and prediction (probabilistic) cues. We identified distinct processing stages of this interactive influence. Firstly, in line with the attentional gain hypothesis, a larger amplitude response of the contralateral N1, and Nd1 for attended gratings was observed. Secondly, conforming to the attenuation-by-prediction hypothesis, a smaller negativity in the time window directly following the peak of the N1 component for predicted compared to unpredicted gratings was observed. In line with the hypothesis that attention and prediction interface, unpredicted/unattended stimuli elicited a larger negativity at central-parietal sites, presumably reflecting an increased prediction error signal. Thirdly, larger P3 responses to unpredicted stimuli pointed to the updating of an internal model. Attention and prediction can be considered as differentiated mechanisms that may interact at different processing stages to optimise perception.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; ERP; Prediction; Predictive coding; Sensory gain; Visual perception; vMMN

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257808     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  9 in total

1.  Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.

Authors:  Jiawei Li; Bo Hong; Guido Nolte; Andreas K Engel; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 2.  Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review.

Authors:  Jiwen Chen; Shujie Wu; Fuhong Li
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Attentional gain is modulated by probabilistic feature expectations in a spatial cueing task: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Anna Marzecová; Antonio Schettino; Andreas Widmann; Iria SanMiguel; Sonja A Kotz; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Preattentive and Predictive Processing of Visual Motion.

Authors:  Constanze Schmitt; Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Attention promotes the neural encoding of prediction errors.

Authors:  Cooper A Smout; Matthew F Tang; Marta I Garrido; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  No Evidence that Predictions and Attention Modulate the First Feedforward Sweep of Cortical Information Processing.

Authors:  Josipa Alilović; Bart Timmermans; Leon C Reteig; Simon van Gaal; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Nine-month-old infants update their predictive models of a changing environment.

Authors:  E Kayhan; M Meyer; J X O'Reilly; S Hunnius; H Bekkering
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  P3b Does Not Reflect Perceived Contrasts.

Authors:  Yen-Kuang Chen; Tony Cheng; Po-Jang Hsieh
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-04-06

9.  The N300: An Index for Predictive Coding of Complex Visual Objects and Scenes.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Kara D Federmeier; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-04-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.