Literature DB >> 27991426

Psychophysical correspondence between vibrotactile intensity and intracortical microstimulation for tactile neuroprostheses in rats.

İsmail Devecioğlu1, Burak Güçlü.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies showed that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) generates artificial sensations which can be utilized as somatosensory feedback in cortical neuroprostheses. To mimic the natural psychophysical response, ICMS parameters are modulated according to psychometric equivalence functions (PEFs). PEFs match the intensity levels of ICMS and mechanical stimuli, which elicit equal detection probabilities, but they typically do not include the frequency as a control variable. We aimed to establish frequency-dependent PEFs for vibrotactile stimulation of the glabrous skin and ICMS in the primary somatosensory cortex of awake freely behaving rats. APPROACH: We collected psychometric data for vibrotactile and ICMS detection at three stimulation frequencies (40, 60 and 80 Hz). The psychometric data were fitted with a model equation of two independent variables (stimulus intensity and frequency) and four subject-dependent parameters. For each rat, we constructed a separate PEF which was used to estimate the ICMS current amplitude for a given displacement amplitude and frequency. The ICMS frequency was set equal to the vibrotactile frequency. We validated the PEFs in a modified task which included randomly selected probe trials presented either with a vibrotactile or an ICMS stimulus, and also at frequencies and intensity levels not tested before. MAIN
RESULTS: The PEFs were generally successful in estimating the ICMS current intensities (no significant differences between vibrotactile and ICMS trials in Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests). Specifically, hit rates from both trial conditions were significantly correlated in 86% of the cases, and 52% of all data had perfect match in linear regression. SIGNIFICANCE: The psychometric correspondence model presented in this study was constructed based on surface functions which define psychophysical detection probability as a function of stimulus intensity and frequency. Therefore, it may be used for the real-time modulation of the frequency and intensity of ICMS pulses in somatosensory neuroprostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27991426     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  4 in total

1.  Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Juliet Heye; Karthik Kumaravelu; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev; Warren M Grill; Sliman Bensmaia; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Functional Frequency Discrimination From Cortical Somatosensory Stimulation in Humans.

Authors:  Daniel R Kramer; Krista Lamorie-Foote; Michael Barbaro; Morgan Lee; Terrance Peng; Angad Gogia; Charles Y Liu; Spencer S Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Somatosensation Evoked by Cortical Surface Stimulation of the Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  St Clair Kirin; Takufumi Yanagisawa; Satoru Oshino; Kohtaroh Edakawa; Masataka Tanaka; Haruhiko Kishima; Yukio Nishimura
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.