Literature DB >> 35376983

Predicting final results of brace treatment of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: first out-of-brace radiograph is better than in-brace radiograph-SOSORT 2020 award winner.

Stefano Negrini1,2, Francesca Di Felice3, Francesco Negrini4,5, Giulia Rebagliati3, Fabio Zaina3, Sabrina Donzelli6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In-brace radiograph of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been shown to reflect brace efficacy and the possibility of achieving curve correction. Conversely, the first out-of-brace radiograph could demonstrate the patient's ability to maintain the correction. We aimed to determine which of the two radiographs is the best predictor of the Cobb angle at the end of treatment (final radiograph).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of a prospective dataset.
METHODS: The population was selected based on the following inclusion criteria: AIS, age 10-18 years; Risser score 0-2; Cobb angle 25-40°; brace treatment; availability of all radiographs. STATISTICS: Pearson correlations provide a first exploration of data. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression model tested the predictors. Finally ROC curve provided a check of model accuracy.
RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included (mean age 13.0 ± 1.3, Cobb angle 33.2 ± 5.5°; 78% females). At the end of treatment, 56% had stabilised, 9% had progressed, and 44% had improved. The difference between the in-brace and final radiographs was 8.0 ± 6.0°, while the difference between the first out-of-brace and final radiographs was 1.8 ± 5.2°. The best predictor of final outcome was the first out-of-brace radiograph (0.80), compared to in-brace (0.68) and baseline (0.59) radiographs. The best cut-offs to predict avoidance of progression were 30% and 10% of the correction rates for the in-brace and first out-of-brace radiographs, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The first out-of-brace radiograph predicts end results better than the in-brace radiograph. It offers an excellent clinical reference for clinicians and patients. The first out-of-brace radiograph should be considered an essential element of future predictive models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brace; COBB angle; Radiograph; Scoliosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35376983     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07165-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Treatment of lumbar curves in scoliotic adolescent females with progressive action short brace: a case series based on the Scoliosis Research Society Committee Criteria.

Authors:  Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Carlo Perisano; Emanuele Marzetti; Francesco Falciglia; Lorenzo Aulisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The Sforzesco brace and SPoRT concept: a brace to replace cast in worst curves.

Authors:  Salvatore Atanasio; Fabio Zaina; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2008-05

3.  The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis. Follow-up results in 295 patients.

Authors:  J B Emans; A Kaelin; P Bancel; J E Hall; M E Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST): Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model in Untreated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using the Simplified Skeletal Maturity System.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Stuart L Weinstein; Mark F Abel; Patrick P Bosch; Matthew B Dobbs; Tyler O Farber; Matthew F Halsey; M Timothy Hresko; Walter F Krengel; Charles T Mehlman; James O Sanders; Richard M Schwend; Suken A Shah; Kushagra Verma
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-11

5.  Presentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Bigger the Kid, the Bigger the Curve.

Authors:  Christine M Goodbody; Wudbhav N Sankar; John M Flynn
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D E Katz; A A Durrani
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Franz Landauer; Cornelius Wimmer; Hannes Behensky
Journal:  Pediatr Rehabil       Date:  2003 Jul-Dec

9.  Braces Designed Using CAD/CAM Combined or Not With Finite Element Modeling Lead to Effective Treatment and Quality of Life After 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Aymeric Guy; Hubert Labelle; Soraya Barchi; Elisabeth Audet-Duchesne; Nikita Cobetto; Stefan Parent; Maxime Raison; Carl-Éric Aubin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Retraction Note: Brace classification study group (BCSG): part one - definitions and atlas.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Grant Wood; Manuel Rigo; Michael Timothy Hresko; Tomasz Kotwicki; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-11-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of the Free-Pelvis Innovation in Very Rigid Braces for Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis: Short-Term Results of a Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Fabrizio Tessadri; Francesco Negrini; Marta Tavernaro; Andrea Zonta; Fabio Zaina; Sabrina Donzelli
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.