Literature DB >> 26114242

Presentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Bigger the Kid, the Bigger the Curve.

Christine M Goodbody1, Wudbhav N Sankar, John M Flynn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is our clinical suspicion that children with higher body mass index (BMIs) who are diagnosed with scoliosis tend to have larger curves on presentation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of BMI on severity of curve at initial presentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive cohort study of consecutive patients age 10 or greater referred to a single large tertiary care center with concern for spinal asymmetry. Patients were separated into 3 BMI categories as measured on the presenting visit: normal weight-≥5th and <85th percentile, overweight-≥85th and <95th percentile, and obese-≥95th percentile. In addition to demographic information, data collected included BMI, curve magnitude, curve location, Risser stage, and where or by whom spinal asymmetry was noted.
RESULTS: A total of 150 patients, 50 in each the normal weight, overweight, and obese categories, were included in this study. Average curve at presentation for normal weight patients was 18.1 degrees, for overweight patients 23.9 degrees (P=0.02), and for obese patients 24.5 degrees (P=0.02). As compared with the normal weight group, odds ratio of presenting with a curve of 40 degrees or above was 10.8 for the overweight group (95% confidence interval, 1.3-88.5, P=0.03) and 12.2 for the obese group (95% confidence interval, 1.5-99.8, P=0.02). Assuming a cut-off of 45 degrees as surgical range, no normal weight patients presented in surgical range (0%), but 7/50 (14%, P=0.01) overweight and 8/50 (16%, P<0.01) obese patients did. Moreover, higher BMI patients were significantly more likely to present at a higher degree of skeletally maturity, with an average Risser of 1.8 for normal weight patients, 2.7 (P=0.01) for overweight patients, and 2.9 (P=0.01) for obese patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Overweight and obese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis present at significantly larger curve magnitudes and significantly higher degrees of skeletal maturity. Moreover, these patients were significantly more likely to present with very large curves and, in our study, all patients presenting with a surgical range curve were either overweight or obese. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective case-control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26114242     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  10 in total

1.  Body Mass Hides the Curve: Thoracic Scoliometer Readings Vary by Body Mass Index Value.

Authors:  Adam Margalit; Greg McKean; Adam Constantine; Carol B Thompson; Rushyuan Jay Lee; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Overweight is not predictive of bracing failure in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results from a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Sabrina Donzelli; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of lower back pain in young athletes.

Authors:  Dilip R Patel; Elizabeth Kinsella
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-07

4.  Predicting final results of brace treatment of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: first out-of-brace radiograph is better than in-brace radiograph-SOSORT 2020 award winner.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Francesca Di Felice; Francesco Negrini; Giulia Rebagliati; Fabio Zaina; Sabrina Donzelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anatomical and radiological characteristics in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with surgical indication.

Authors:  Mauro Costa Morais Tavares Junior; Felipe Ribeiro Ledur; Olavo Biraghi Letaif; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and the Magnitude of Curve at Diagnosis of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Authors:  Natalie Woods; Kristy Wittmeier; Kathy Mulder; Brenden Dufault; Brian Black
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-05-09

7.  Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Ching-Lung Tai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  The Height-Width-Depth Ratios of the Intervertebral Discs and Vertebral Bodies in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis vs Controls in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Tom P C Schlösser; Rob C Brink; Dino Colo; Marijn van Stralen; Lin Shi; Winnie C W Chu; Pheng-Ann Heng; René M Castelein; Jack C Y Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Correlation between respiratory function and spine and thorax deformity in children with mild scoliosis.

Authors:  Andrzej Szopa; Małgorzata Domagalska-Szopa
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Annual Observation of Changes in the Angle of Trunk Rotation. Trunk Asymmetry Predictors. A Study from a Scoliosis Screening in School Adolescents.

Authors:  Katarzyna Adamczewska; Marzena Wiernicka; Ewa Kamińska; Joanna Małecka; Agata Dąbrowska; Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.