Literature DB >> 3810295

The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis. Follow-up results in 295 patients.

J B Emans, A Kaelin, P Bancel, J E Hall, M E Miller.   

Abstract

A total of 295 patients treated with the Boston bracing system with follow-up of at least 1 year after completion of bracing are reviewed. Pre-brace curves ranged from 20-59 degrees Cobb. Mean age at brace initiation was 13.2 years with a mean treatment time of 2.9 years and mean follow-up of 1.4 years. Mean best in-brace correction averaged 50% with correction averaging 23% at the initiation of weaning from the brace. By the time of brace discontinuance, average curve correction was 15%. At follow-up, average correction was 11%. A comparison of follow-up with pre-brace values of major curves showed that 49% were unchanged +/- 5 degree, 39% achieved final correction of 5-15 degrees, 4% achieved final correction of 15 degrees or more, 4% of patients lost 5-15 degrees, and 3% lost more than 15 degrees by the time of follow-up. Eleven percent of patients underwent surgery during the period of bracing; 1% had surgery during follow-up period. Correction and control of major curves with apexes below T8 and above L2 were best. A strong correlation between best, or initial in-brace correction, and follow-up correction was noted. Young age at the initiation of bracing and higher degrees of pre-brace curvature increased the incidence of surgery. Those curves that had corrected most at the end of bracing were most at risk for loss of correction after bracing. Partial compliance with brace wear appeared as effective as full-time wear. Boston braces without superstructure appeared to be as effective as braces with superstructure for curves with apexes below T7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3810295     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198610000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  72 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of exercise therapy for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Simon C Mordecai; Harshad V Dabke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Effectiveness of the Providence nighttime bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study of 36 female patients.

Authors:  Timo Yrjönen; Mauno Ylikoski; Dietrich Schlenzka; Riitta Kinnunen; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Professional opinion concerning the effectiveness of bracing relative to observation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Melanie J Donnelly; Kevin F Spratt; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Initial Cobb angle reduction velocity following bracing as a new predictor for curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Saihu Mao; Benlong Shi; Leilei Xu; Zhiwei Wang; Alec Lik Hang Hung; Tsz Ping Lam; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Kwong Man Lee; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Evaluation of the efficiency of Boston brace on scoliotic curve control: A review of literature.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Timon Rabczuk
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Providence nighttime bracing is effective in treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis even in curves larger than 35°.

Authors:  Ane Simony; Inge Beuschau; Lena Quisth; Stig Mindedahl Jespersen; Leah Yaccat Carreon; Mikkel Osterheden Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Predictive factors for brace treatment outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a best-evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Manon van den Bogaart; Barend J van Royen; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Marinus de Kleuver; Sayf S A Faraj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is rising growth rate the triggering factor in progression?

Authors:  C J Goldberg; F E Dowling; E E Fogarty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  "Brace Technology" Thematic Series - The ScoliOlogiC® Chêneau light™ brace in the treatment of scoliosis.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss; Mario Werkmann
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.