Stuart A Weinzimer1, Ryan J Bailey2, Richard M Bergenstal3, Revital Nimri4,5, Roy W Beck2, Desmond Schatz6, Louise Ambler-Osborn7, Darja Smigoc Schweiger8,9, Thekla von dem Berge10, Judy Sibayan2, Mary L Johnson3, Peter Calhoun2, Moshe Phillip4,5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 2. Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA. 3. International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 5. Sacker Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. 6. University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 7. Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8. University Medical Center Ljubljana, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 9. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. 10. Auf der Bult Centre for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
Background: We recently reported that use of an "advanced" hybrid closed-loop system reduced hyperglycemia without increasing hypoglycemia compared to a first-generation system. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether this improved performance was specifically related to better mealtime glycemic control. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of postprandial glycemic control in an open-label, multinational, randomized crossover trial of 112 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 14-29, of the Medtronic MiniMed™ 670G hybrid closed-loop system (670G) versus the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system, for 12 weeks each. We compared glycemic and insulin delivery metrics over a 3 h horizon across all meals to assess system performance and outcomes. Results: Overall meal size and premeal insulin on board were similar during run-in and between 670G and AHCL arms. Compared with 670G arm, premeal, peak, and mean glucose levels were numerically lower in the AHCL arm (167 ± 23, 231 ± 23, and 177 ± 20 mg/dL vs. 175 ± 23, 235 ± 23, and 180 ± 19 mg/dL, respectively), with a trend to lower hyperglycemia level 2 in AHCL arm. Adjusting for premeal glucose level, all postmeal outcomes between 670G and AHCL were statistically similar. Prandial insulin delivery also was similar in both treatment arms (21 ± 9 vs. 23 ± 10 U), with a shift in basal/bolus ratio from 28%/71% in 670G arm to 20%/80% in AHCL arm. Conclusions: Reduced hyperglycemia with AHCL compared to 670G was not related to early postprandial glycemic excursions after adjusting for premeal glucose level (<3 h after meal), but likely to later (>3 h) postprandial or overnight improvements. Further refinements to mealtime bolus algorithms and strategies may more optimally control prandial glycemic excursions.
Background: We recently reported that use of an "advanced" hybrid closed-loop system reduced hyperglycemia without increasing hypoglycemia compared to a first-generation system. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether this improved performance was specifically related to better mealtime glycemic control. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of postprandial glycemic control in an open-label, multinational, randomized crossover trial of 112 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 14-29, of the Medtronic MiniMed™ 670G hybrid closed-loop system (670G) versus the Medtronic advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system, for 12 weeks each. We compared glycemic and insulin delivery metrics over a 3 h horizon across all meals to assess system performance and outcomes. Results: Overall meal size and premeal insulin on board were similar during run-in and between 670G and AHCL arms. Compared with 670G arm, premeal, peak, and mean glucose levels were numerically lower in the AHCL arm (167 ± 23, 231 ± 23, and 177 ± 20 mg/dL vs. 175 ± 23, 235 ± 23, and 180 ± 19 mg/dL, respectively), with a trend to lower hyperglycemia level 2 in AHCL arm. Adjusting for premeal glucose level, all postmeal outcomes between 670G and AHCL were statistically similar. Prandial insulin delivery also was similar in both treatment arms (21 ± 9 vs. 23 ± 10 U), with a shift in basal/bolus ratio from 28%/71% in 670G arm to 20%/80% in AHCL arm. Conclusions: Reduced hyperglycemia with AHCL compared to 670G was not related to early postprandial glycemic excursions after adjusting for premeal glucose level (<3 h after meal), but likely to later (>3 h) postprandial or overnight improvements. Further refinements to mealtime bolus algorithms and strategies may more optimally control prandial glycemic excursions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescents; Closed-loop system; Postprandial blood glucose; Young adults
Authors: Sue A Brown; Boris P Kovatchev; Dan Raghinaru; John W Lum; Bruce A Buckingham; Yogish C Kudva; Lori M Laffel; Carol J Levy; Jordan E Pinsker; R Paul Wadwa; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Stacey M Anderson; Mei Mei Church; Vikash Dadlani; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Elvira Isganaitis; David W Lam; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melissa H Lee; Barbora Paldus; Sara Vogrin; Dale Morrison; Dessi P Zaharieva; Jean Lu; Hannah M Jones; Emma Netzer; Lesley Robinson; Benyamin Grosman; Anirban Roy; Natalie Kurtz; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Alicia J Jenkins; David N O'Neal Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Richard M Bergenstal; Revital Nimri; Roy W Beck; Amy Criego; Lori Laffel; Desmond Schatz; Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Stuart A Weinzimer; Judy Sibayan; Mary L Johnson; Ryan J Bailey; Peter Calhoun; Anders Carlson; Elvira Isganaitis; Rachel Bello; Anastasia Albanese-O'Neill; Klemen Dovc; Torben Biester; Kate Weyman; Korey Hood; Moshe Phillip Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-01-16 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Satish K Garg; Stuart A Weinzimer; William V Tamborlane; Bruce A Buckingham; Bruce W Bode; Timothy S Bailey; Ronald L Brazg; Jacob Ilany; Robert H Slover; Stacey M Anderson; Richard M Bergenstal; Benyamin Grosman; Anirban Roy; Toni L Cordero; John Shin; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Gregory P Forlenza; Orit Pinhas-Hamiel; David R Liljenquist; Dorothy I Shulman; Timothy S Bailey; Bruce W Bode; Michael A Wood; Bruce A Buckingham; Kevin B Kaiserman; John Shin; Suiying Huang; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Grenye O'Malley; Laurel H Messer; Carol J Levy; Jordan E Pinsker; Gregory P Forlenza; Elvira Isganaitis; Yogish C Kudva; Laya Ekhlaspour; Dan Raghinaru; John Lum; Sue A Brown Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Bruce A Buckingham; Mark P Christiansen; Gregory P Forlenza; R Paul Wadwa; Thomas A Peyser; Joon Bok Lee; Jason O'Connor; Eyal Dassau; Lauren M Huyett; Jennifer E Layne; Trang T Ly Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Kerem Ozer; Alison M Cooper; Lily P Ahn; Cassidy R Waggonner; Thomas C Blevins Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Sue A Brown; Gregory P Forlenza; Bruce W Bode; Jordan E Pinsker; Carol J Levy; Amy B Criego; David W Hansen; Irl B Hirsch; Anders L Carlson; Richard M Bergenstal; Jennifer L Sherr; Sanjeev N Mehta; Lori M Laffel; Viral N Shah; Anuj Bhargava; Ruth S Weinstock; Sarah A MacLeish; Daniel J DeSalvo; Thomas C Jones; Grazia Aleppo; Bruce A Buckingham; Trang T Ly Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 17.152