Literature DB >> 35347446

Enteric methane emissions by lactating and dry cows in the high Andes of Peru.

Catherine Yasmín Salas-Riega1, Sandra Osorio2, Julyssa Del Pilar Gamarra2, Victor Alvarado-Bolovich1,2, Cesar Mauro Osorio2, Carlos A Gomez3.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine enteric methane emissions using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) technique and comparing with The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology in lactating cows (LC) and dry cows (DC) in the Peruvian highlands. Enteric methane (CH4) emissions were measured on 5 LC and 6 DC Brown Swiss in a grazing system without concentrate. Forages samples were collected and analyzed for dry matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber. Milk samples were collected and analyzed for fat, crude protein, and lactose to estimate energy-corrected milk. Animal intakes were measured using the external marker titanium dioxide (production of feces) and crude protein in feces (organic digestibility of the feed) and estimated by using performance data. The enteric methane emissions of LC were higher than methane emissions of DC (325 and 266 g CH4/cow/day for LC and DC, respectively (P < 0.001)). Methane emissions were 358.5 g CH4/day by SF6 technique and 291.6 g CH4/day by IPCC methodology for LC and 337.4 g CH4/day by SF6 technique and 195.8 g CH4/day by IPCC methodology for DC. Methane yields measured by SF6 were higher than methane yields estimated by IPCC methodology (29 g CH4/kg DM and 22 g CH4/kg DM using SF6 technique and IPCC methodology, respectively (P < 0.001)). Methane yields were differently for all expressions by physiological stage and method. The methane conversion factor (Ym) was 9.7% for LC and 9.6% for DC. Methane intensities were similar by method (P > 0.05). It was concluded that IPCC's methodology underestimate the CH4 emissions of dairy systems in the Peruvian Andes; therefore, in order to obtain precise Ym, direct measurements of enteric CH4 in the different regions of Peruvian highlands are required.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enteric methane; Grazing; High Andes; Sulfur hexafluoride; Tier 2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35347446     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03146-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  11 in total

1.  Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique.

Authors:  K Johnson; M Huyler; H Westberg; B Lamb; P Zimmerman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants.

Authors:  M S Allen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Effect of concentrate level on enteric methane emissions, production performance, and rumen fermentation of Jersey cows grazing kikuyu-dominant pasture during summer.

Authors:  Josef D V van Wyngaard; Robin Meeske; Lourens J Erasmus
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 5.  Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle.

Authors:  M S Allen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effect of forage-to-concentrate ratio in dairy cow diets on emission of methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia, lactation performance, and manure excretion.

Authors:  M J Aguerre; M A Wattiaux; J M Powell; G A Broderick; C Arndt
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.

Authors:  C Arndt; J M Powell; M J Aguerre; M A Wattiaux
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 8.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions.

Authors:  J R Knapp; G L Laur; P A Vadas; W P Weiss; J M Tricarico
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Technical note: a procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide.

Authors:  W D Myers; P A Ludden; V Nayigihugu; B W Hess
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Methods for Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants.

Authors:  Ida M L D Storm; Anne Louise F Hellwing; Nicolaj I Nielsen; Jørgen Madsen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.