Literature DB >> 21605777

Effect of forage-to-concentrate ratio in dairy cow diets on emission of methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia, lactation performance, and manure excretion.

M J Aguerre1, M A Wattiaux, J M Powell, G A Broderick, C Arndt.   

Abstract

Holstein cows housed in a modified tie-stall barn were used to determine the effect of feeding diets with different forage-to-concentrate ratios (F:C) on performance and emission of CH(4), CO(2) and manure NH(3)-N. Eight multiparous cows (means ± standard deviation): 620 ± 68 kg of body weight; 52 ± 34 d in milk and 8 primiparous cows (546 ± 38 kg of body weight; 93 ± 39 d in milk) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 air-flow controlled chambers, constructed to fit 4 cows each. Chambers were assigned to dietary treatment sequences in a single 4 × 4 Latin square design. Dietary treatments, fed as 16.2% crude protein total mixed rations included the following F:C ratio: 47:53, 54:46, 61:39, and 68:32 [diet dry matter (DM) basis]. Forage consisted of alfalfa silage and corn silage in a 1:1 ratio. Cow performance and emission data were measured on the last 7 d and the last 4 d, respectively of each 21-d period. Air samples entering and exiting each chamber were analyzed with a photo-acoustic field gas monitor. In a companion study, fermentation pattern was studied in 8 rumen-cannulated cows. Increasing F:C ratio in the diet had no effect on DM intake (21.1 ± 1.5 kg/d), energy-corrected milk (ECM, 37.4 ± 2.2 kg/d), ECM/DM intake (1.81 ± 0.18), yield of milk fat, and manure excretion and composition; however, it increased milk fat content linearly by 7% and decreased linearly true protein, lactose, and solids-not-fat content (by 4, 1, and 2%, respectively) and yield (by 10, 6, and 6%, respectively), and milk N-to-N intake ratio. On average 93% of the N consumed by the cows in the chambers was accounted for as milk N, manure N, or emitted NH(3)-N. Increasing the F:C ratio also increased ruminal pH linearly and affected concentrations of butyrate and isovalerate quadratically. Increasing the F:C ratio from 47:53 to 68:32 increased CH(4) emission from 538 to 648 g/cow per day, but had no effect on manure NH(3)-N emission (14.1 ± 3.9 g/cow per day) and CO(2) emission (18,325 ± 2,241 g/cow per day). In this trial, CH(4) emission remained constant per unit of neutral detergent fiber intake (1g of CH(4) was emitted for every 10.3g of neutral detergent fiber consumed by the cow), but increased from 14.4 to 18.0 g/kg of ECM when the percentage of forage in the diet increased from 47 to 68%. Although the pattern of emission within a day was distinct for each gas, emissions were higher between morning feeding (0930 h) and afternoon milking (1600 h) than later in the day. Altering the level of forage within a practical range and rebalancing dietary crude protein with common feeds of the Midwest of the United States had no effects on manure NH(3)-N emission but altered CH(4) emission.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605777     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-4011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  22 in total

1.  Concentrate: forage ratio in the diet of dairy cows does not alter milk physical attributes.

Authors:  Sandro Charopen Machado; Concepta Margareth McManus; Marcelo Tempel Stumpf; Vivian Fischer
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Enteric methane emissions by lactating and dry cows in the high Andes of Peru.

Authors:  Catherine Yasmín Salas-Riega; Sandra Osorio; Julyssa Del Pilar Gamarra; Victor Alvarado-Bolovich; Cesar Mauro Osorio; Carlos A Gomez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Changes in nutrient balance, methane emissions, physiologic biomarkers, and production performance in goats fed different forage-to-concentrate ratios during lactation.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández; Alberto Hernández; Julio Gomis-Tena; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Prediction of enteric methane emissions from lactating cows using methane to carbon dioxide ratio in the breath.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Suzuki; Yuko Kamiya; Kohei Oikawa; Itoko Nonaka; Takumi Shinkai; Fuminori Terada; Taketo Obitsu
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.974

5.  Effects of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio on nutrient digestibility and enteric methane production in growing goats (Capra hircus hircus) and Sika deer (Cervus nippon hortulorum).

Authors:  Youngjun Na; Dong Hua Li; Sang Rak Lee
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Dietary energy sources and levels shift the multi-kingdom microbiota and functions in the rumen of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  Tansol Park; Lu Ma; Ying Ma; Xiaoqiao Zhou; Dengpan Bu; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22

7.  Effect of Gynosaponin on Rumen In vitro Methanogenesis under Different Forage-Concentrate Ratios.

Authors:  Bakhetgul Manatbay; Yanfen Cheng; Shengyong Mao; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Effects of Forage:Concentrate Ratio on Growth Performance, Ruminal Fermentation and Blood Metabolites in Housing-feeding Yaks.

Authors:  G J Chen; S D Song; B X Wang; Z F Zhang; Z L Peng; C H Guo; J C Zhong; Y Wang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  A mathematical model to describe the diurnal pattern of enteric methane emissions from non-lactating dairy cows post-feeding.

Authors:  Min Wang; Rong Wang; Xuezhao Sun; Liang Chen; Shaoxun Tang; Chuangshe Zhou; Xuefeng Han; Jinghe Kang; Zhiliang Tan; Zhixiong He
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2015-11-28

10.  Meta-analysis of calorimeter data to establish relationships between methane and carbon dioxide emissions or oxygen consumption for dairy cattle.

Authors:  Aurélie Aubry; Tianhai Yan
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2015-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.