Literature DB >> 30197131

Effect of concentrate level on enteric methane emissions, production performance, and rumen fermentation of Jersey cows grazing kikuyu-dominant pasture during summer.

Josef D V van Wyngaard1, Robin Meeske2, Lourens J Erasmus3.   

Abstract

The effect of concentrate feeding level on enteric CH4 emissions from cows grazing medium quality summer pasture is yet to be investigated. Sixty multiparous Jersey cows (9 rumen-cannulated) were used in a randomized complete block design study (with the cannulated cows in a 3 × 3 Latin square design) to investigate the effect of concentrate feeding level (0, 4, and 8 kg/cow per day; as-fed basis) on enteric CH4 emissions, production performance, and rumen fermentation of dairy cows grazing summer pasture (17 cows plus 3 cannulated cows per treatment). Enteric CH4 emissions were measured from 11 cows per treatment group during one 7-d measurement period using the sulfur hexafluoride tracer gas technique. Pasture dry matter intake (DMI) was determined parallel with the CH4 measurement period using TiO2 as an external marker, and milk yield, milk composition, cow condition, and pasture pre- and postgrazing measurements were also recorded. Daily total DMI (11.2 to 15.6 kg/cow), milk yield (9.1 to 18.2 kg/cow), energy-corrected milk (ECM; 11.2 to 21.6 kg/cow), and milk lactose content (44.1 to 46.7 g/kg) increased linearly, whereas pasture DMI (11.2 to 8.4 kg/cow) decreased linearly with increasing concentrate feeding level. Daily CH4 production (323 to 378 g/d) increased linearly due to the increase in total DMI, whereas CH4 yield (29.1 to 25.1 g/kg of DMI) and CH4 intensity (35.5 to 21.1 g/kg of milk yield; and 28.8 to 17.6 g/kg of ECM) decreased linearly with increasing concentrate feeding level. Diurnal ruminal pH (6.45 to 6.32) and in sacco DM and neutral detergent fiber disappearance decreased linearly. Acetic and propionic acid were unaffected by treatment, whereas butyric acid (5.21 to 6.14 mM) increased linearly and quadratically with increasing concentrate feeding level. It was concluded that a high concentrate feeding level not only increases animal efficiency but is moreover a viable CH4 mitigation option for dairy cows grazing kikuyu-dominant pasture in late summer when pasture is inherently fibrous.
Copyright © 2018 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SF(6); methane mitigation; pasture-based; tropical pasture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30197131     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Enteric methane emissions by lactating and dry cows in the high Andes of Peru.

Authors:  Catherine Yasmín Salas-Riega; Sandra Osorio; Julyssa Del Pilar Gamarra; Victor Alvarado-Bolovich; Cesar Mauro Osorio; Carlos A Gomez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  Enteric Methane Emissions and Animal Performance in Dairy and Beef Cattle Production: Strategies, Opportunities, and Impact of Reducing Emissions.

Authors:  Byeng-Ryel Min; Seul Lee; Hyunjung Jung; Daniel N Miller; Rui Chen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed.

Authors:  Dieter Schrenk; Margherita Bignami; Laurent Bodin; James Kevin Chipman; Jesús Del Mazo; Bettina Grasl-Kraupp; Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom; Jean-Charles Leblanc; Carlo Stefano Nebbia; Elsa Nielsen; Evangelia Ntzani; Annette Petersen; Salomon Sand; Tanja Schwerdtle; Christiane Vleminckx; Heather Wallace; Vasileios Bampidis; Bruce Cottrill; Maria Jose Frutos; Peter Furst; Anthony Parker; Marco Binaglia; Anna Christodoulidou; Petra Gergelova; Irene Munoz Guajardo; Carina Wenger; Christer Hogstrand
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2020-11-04

4.  Environmental Impact of Rotationally Grazed Pastures at Different Management Intensities in South Africa.

Authors:  Hendrik P J Smit; Thorsten Reinsch; Pieter A Swanepoel; Ralf Loges; Christof Kluß; Friedhelm Taube
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  Lifeng Dong; Binchang Li; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Alternative pathways for hydrogen sink originated from the ruminal fermentation of carbohydrates: Which microorganisms are involved in lowering methane emission?

Authors:  Ana Margarida Pereira; Maria de Lurdes Nunes Enes Dapkevicius; Alfredo E S Borba
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Enteric methane mitigation interventions.

Authors:  Julia Q Fouts; Mallory C Honan; Breanna M Roque; Juan M Tricarico; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-08

8.  Evaluation of Feed Strategies and Changes of Stocking Rate to Decrease the Carbon Footprint in a Traditional Cow-Calf System: A Simulation Model.

Authors:  Paula Toro-Mujica
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.