| Literature DB >> 35346235 |
Oscar Blanch-Lombarte1,2, Laura Tarancon-Diez3,4, Julia G Prado5,6, María Pernas7, Ana Moyano8,9, Nuria Pedreño-Lopez8,1, Miguel Arenas10,11,12, Tamara Alvaro8, Concepción Casado8, Isabel Olivares8, Mar Vera13, Carmen Rodriguez13, Jorge Del Romero13, Cecilio López-Galíndez8, Ezequiel Ruiz-Mateos3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-Term Non-Progressors (LTNPs) are untreated Human Immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected individuals able to control disease progression for prolonged periods. However, the LTNPs status is temporary, as viral load increases followed by decreases in CD4 + T-cell counts. Control of HIV-1 infection in LTNPs viremic controllers, have been associated with effective immunodominant HIV-1 Gag-CD8 + T-cell responses restricted by protective HLA-B alleles. Individuals carrying HLA-B*14:02 control HIV-1 infection is related to an immunodominant Env-CD8 + T-cell response. Limited data are available on the contribution of HLA-B*14:02 CD8 + T -cells in LTNPs.Entities:
Keywords: CD8 + T-cells; Env-EL9 escape HLA-B*14:02; Long-term non-progressor (LTNP); Loss of viral control (LVC)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35346235 PMCID: PMC8962528 DOI: 10.1186/s12977-022-00591-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Fig. 1Phylogenetic analysis of HIV-1 env evolution during clinical follow-up. a Clinical follow-up. Viral load (circles), percentage of CD4 + (squares) and CD8 + T cells (triangles) during the patient follow-up are represented. The x axis refers to years after HIV-1 diagnosis. Colored circles indicate samples taken during the patient follow-up and that are included in the phylogenetic analysis. The dotted grey line separates samples before and after LVC. b Phylogenetic analysis revealed the presence of three HIV-1 variants. Two different viruses (A and B) and two different subpopulations (B1 and B2) are represented. A Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree based on the C2-V5 env region was constructed with 201 unique sequences obtained from proviral DNA (circles), plasma viral RNA (triangles) and virions co-cultured RNA (squares). The sequences obtained at different times points during the patient follow-up are color coded. The identical sequences are included in boxes. Branch lengths are presented as the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values above 85% are shown with asterisks. ES61 and HXB2 sequences were included as outgroup viruses to root the phylogenetic tree. c. Replacement of viral populations in proviral sequences during follow-up. A, B1 and B frequency (%) obtained at different times points are represented color coded. The grey line indicates samples collected after LVC
Fig. 2Estimation of viral evolution in the C2-V5 region during the patient follow-up. a The C2-V5 env diversity (y axis) was calculated as the number of base substitutions per site and averaging from all sequence pairs within each group and for each variant. For statistical evaluations, we used the Tukey's multiple comparisons test considering significance at the 95% (p-values < 0.05 were assumed as statistically significant). b The env divergence (y axis) was estimated as the pairwise temporal distance from A, B1 and B2 time points (x axis) to the corresponding time to the MRCA. c and d panels show B2 C2-V5 genetic diversity c and genetic divergence d (y axis) over time (x axis). The plots include the global diversity (squares), number of substitutions per site d (circles), number of sites with synonymous substitution per synonymous site (dS) (triangles) and number of sites with nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (dN) (square) from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups
Proviral DNA sequences in patient HLA restricted epitopes from variant B2
aPredicted epitope representing the consensus sequence obtained from HIV-1 subtype B. ? denote mix of more than two aa in that position in the HIV data base (https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/QUICK_ALIGNv2/QuickAlign.html)
bShannon entropy values at population level calculated as described in Methods
cDate refers to the different time-points sequenced. Samples before and after LVC are separated by a black line
Aa sequence conservation relative to the HXB2 subtype B consensus is indicated with dashes. Lower case letters indicate a mix of two aa, the consensus and the mutated one
Fig. 3HIV-1 variants in Gag-DA9 and Env-EL9 HLA-B*14:02 restricted epitopes and HIV-specific CD8 + T cell responses. a Amino acid (aa) sequence variation in Gag-DA9 and Env-EL9 epitopes from proviral DNA and plasma RNA samples at different time points. Aa sequence conservation relative to the HXB2 sequence is indicated with dashes. The number of observed epitope variants vs the number of sequences analyzed at each time point is shown in parenthesis. A line separates samples collected before and after the LVC. b DA9 and Env-EL9 aa sequences representative of the different variants designed to perform the ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS). c Quantification of HIV-1 specific-CD8 + T cell responses (y axis) against DA9 (blue), Env-EL9 WT (green) and Env-EL9 with the L592R mutation (red), determined by the ELISpot analysis, at different time points (x axis). d Gag-DA9, Env-EL9 WT, Env-EL9 with L592R and Env-EL9 592R + 588R specific-CD8 + T-cell responses before and after LVC as the proportion of peptide specific IFN-γ + production by CD8 + T-cells by multiparametric flow cytometry assay. e The pie charts show the poly-functionality of Env-EL9 (upper pies) and Env-EL9 with L592R + L588R mutations (bottom pies) specific-CD8 + T-cell responses before (Jun-06) and after (Oct-15) LVC. The pie charts are based on the proportions of cells producing combinations of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, CD107a and perforin. Single and double production of CD107a and perforin were excluded from the representations
Fig. 4Changes in RC before and after LVC. Infectivity and protein structural stability of EL9 mutants. a RC estimated as RLU (relative units of luciferase) production (y axis) of the co-cultured viruses obtained before and after LVC (Oct-14 and Apr-15, blue bars) tested in TZM-bl cells. b Infectivity of the pseudoviruses generated with Gp160 Env expression plasmids derived from A (April-06), B1 (c4- May-12 and c7 March- 04) and B2 variants. Four B2 clones from samples previous to LVC (c4, c3, c6 and c8) and 6 B2 clones from Oct-14 (c16, c11, c15, c8, c20, c14) are included. Time points used for pseudoviruses generation was included in brackets. A pNL4-3 pseudovirus is also included as a reference. All these experiments were performed in duplicate c We compared infectivity expressed as RLU (relative units of luciferase) for WT, ESC (L592R mutation) and ESC + COM (L592R and K588R mutations) Env-EL9 sequences. Pseudoviruses were constructed from B2 c-11 with L592R mutation by site-directed mutagenesis. The infectivity values were normalized according to the RC of the pNL4-3 control virus (value = 1). Bars represent standard deviation from two experiments with three replicates per experiment d DOPE of the protein structure of the WT (black), WT with the escape mutation L592R (ESC, white) and WT with both escape and compensatory mutations (ESC + COM, dark gray). Note that in terms of protein stability, the order is the following: WT (more stable) > L592R with K588R > L592R (less stable). e Illustration of the best-fitting 3D structural models (with zoom in the mutation positions) for the WT (the orange and blue positions correspond to those that will suffer the escape and compensatory mutations, respectively), ESC (the red position corresponds to that with the escape mutation) and ESC + COM (the red and pink positions correspond to those with the escape mutation and compensatory mutations, respectively) states