| Literature DB >> 21347345 |
Guido Ferrari1, Bette Korber, Nilu Goonetilleke, Michael K P Liu, Emma L Turnbull, Jesus F Salazar-Gonzalez, Natalie Hawkins, Steve Self, Sydeaka Watson, Michael R Betts, Cynthia Gay, Kara McGhee, Pierre Pellegrino, Ian Williams, Georgia D Tomaras, Barton F Haynes, Clive M Gray, Persephone Borrow, Mario Roederer, Andrew J McMichael, Kent J Weinhold.
Abstract
In the present study, we analyzed the functional profile of CD8+ T-cell responses directed against autologous transmitted/founder HIV-1 isolates during acute and early infection, and examined whether multifunctionality is required for selection of virus escape mutations. Seven anti-retroviral therapy-naïve subjects were studied in detail between 1 and 87 weeks following onset of symptoms of acute HIV-1 infection. Synthetic peptides representing the autologous transmitted/founder HIV-1 sequences were used in multiparameter flow cytometry assays to determine the functionality of HIV-1-specific CD8+ T memory cells. In all seven patients, the earliest T cell responses were predominantly oligofunctional, although the relative contribution of multifunctional cell responses increased significantly with time from infection. Interestingly, only the magnitude of the total and not of the poly-functional T-cell responses was significantly associated with the selection of escape mutants. However, the high contribution of MIP-1β-producing CD8+ T-cells to the total response suggests that mechanisms not limited to cytotoxicity could be exerting immune pressure during acute infection. Lastly, we show that epitope entropy, reflecting the capacity of the epitope to tolerate mutational change and defined as the diversity of epitope sequences at the population level, was also correlated with rate of emergence of escape mutants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21347345 PMCID: PMC3037354 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Patient demographic, CD4 slope, and plasma virus load set point, and class I HLA.
| Patient ID/Class I HLA alleles | Gender | Age | Transmission | Fiebig | CD4 slope | pVL at Setpointwk40
|
|
| M | 56 | MSM | 2 | 0.7727±2.095 | 7580 |
| A*3101,*0201; B*4402,*4001; C*0302; C*0501 | ||||||
|
| M | 23 | MSM | 2 | 2.733±2.336 | 199 |
| A*0101,*2301; B*1402, | ||||||
|
| M | 23 | MSM | 2 | 0.2687±1.994 | 5422 |
| A*0205; B*5301, | ||||||
|
| M | 36 | MSM | 3 | −2.406±0.9509 | 57200 |
| A*0201,*6801; B*0702,*4402; Cw*0501; Cw*0702 | ||||||
|
| M | 37 | MSM | 3 | −0.4987±0.5685 | 56350 |
| A*0201,*0301; B*1501,*3501; Cw*09,*0401 | ||||||
|
| M | 45 | MSM | 3 | −3.593±1.984 | 151150 |
| A*3201,*0201; B*0702,*3906; Cw*1502,*0702 | ||||||
|
| M | 41 | MSM | 3 | −3.254±0.8993 | 190050 |
| A*0201; B*5501,*4001; Cw*10, *09 |
a. Age at time of infection;
b. Fiebig stage at screening;
c. The data represent the average value of the plasma virus load (pVL) between week 36 and 56 in copies/ml.
Figure 1CD4 cell counts and virus load.
A. The CD4 counts are reported in cell/mm3 at each time point following the onset of symptoms. B. The virus load in each subject is reported on a logarithmic scale as RNA copies/ml at each time point following the onset of the symptoms. The black dotted line represents the limits of 2,000 copies/ml used to identify controllers based on the CHAVI definitions of less than 2,000 copies/ml at 3 consecutive time points in 12 months.
Figure 2Functionality of Gag-specific responses.
The total frequency of Gag-specific CD8+ memory T cells within the memory CD8+ T cell pool is reported within each pie as mean ± standard deviation. A) The pie charts represent the relative contributions of each functional family to the total response at each time point for the seven HIV-1 infected subjects. The color code for each number of functions is reported below the x-axis of the graph. The number of subjects studied at each time point is reported under each pie chart. B) In the graph each point represents one subject, and they are color coded according to the legend in the figure to represent the different weeks following onset of symptoms (WFOSx). Each grey box represents the inter-quartile distribution of the responses. The graphs represent the relative contribution to the total response made by each functional family at each time point. The trend line and p values for the statistically significant increase in subsets with 3 and 4 functions are also reported in the graph.
Figure 3Functionality of SEB responses.
The frequency of SEB-responsive CD8+ T cells (irrespective of their functional profile) within the total memory CD8+ T cell pool is shown above each pie. The pie charts represent the relative contribution of each functional family to the total response for the non-HIV-infected (SN; left pie charts) and infected donors (SP; right pie charts). The responses in the latter group represent those detected within the first 8 weeks post-onset of symptoms. The color code for each functional family is reported below the x-axis of the graph. Each dot represents one individual in the graph and color codes for the two groups are reported at the bottom of the figure (brown SN; blue SP). Each grey box represents the inter-quartile distribution of the responses. The graph represents the frequency of each functional family within the total SEB-responsive population for the subjects in each group.
Analysis of Entropy of sequences and epitope-specific functional responses based on the order of time of appearance of epitope mutations within each individual.
| Earliest Positive ICS | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Week | VL c/ml | Epitope | Order of escape | Mutation | Entropy | Total Freq | Fxn 1 | Fxn 2-5 | MIP-1β+ | |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Rev 49–66 | QR | A*0201 | 4 | 89,156 | a | 1 | e-ME | 5.07 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
| Vif 113–129 | DCFSES | A*3101 | 4 | 89,156 | b | 2 | e-ME | 3.36 | 0.58 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.52 | |
| Env 830–847 | IEVVQRACRAILHIPRRI | undetermined | 12 | 17,587 | c | 3 | l-ME | 3.31 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.24 | |
| Env 665–682 | LFSYH | A*0201 | 4 | 89,156 | d | 4 | nME | 3 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.30 | |
| Gag 481–498 |
| B*4001 | 12 | 17,587 | e | 4 | nME | 3.09 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.28 | |
| Pol 824–841 | VKTIHTDNGSNFTSTTVK | undetermined | 24 | 29,453 | f | 4 | nME | 1.43/3.08 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.34 | |
|
| Env 581–596 | LAL | B*1402/Cw*0702 | 2 | 181,262 | a | 1 | e-ME | 1.48 | 3.60 | 1.63 | 1.97 | 3.37 |
| Gag 236–253 | IAGS | B*5701 | 2 | 181,262 | b | 2 | e-ME | 1.29 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.15 | 0.79 | |
| Gag 140–157 | GQMVHQA | B*5701 | 4 | 1,908 | c | 3 | l-ME | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.54 | 0.37 | 0.45 | |
| Nef 113–130 | WVY | B*5701 | 2 | 181,262 | d | 4 | nME | 1.05 | 1.69 | 1.04 | 0.65 | 1.52 | |
|
| Env 350–368 | HVVDKLRE | Cw*0401 | 4 | 17,907 | a | 1 | e-ME | 4.99 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.11 | 0.59 |
| Gag 236–253 | IAGS | B*5701 | 4 | 17,907 | b | 2 | e-ME | 1.29 | 0.42 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.32 | |
| Env 334–351 | SGEDWNKTLSHVVDKLRE | undetermined | 4 | 17,907 | c | 3 | e-ME | 5.54 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.41 | |
| Env 605–622 | T | B*5701 | 4 | 17,907 | d | 4 | l-ME | 2.69 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.19 | |
|
| Pol 81–98 | DTGADDTVL | B*4402 | 2 | 1,451,400 | a | na | e-ME | 2.82 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.52 |
|
| Nef 65–82 | EVGFPVRP | A*0301 | 1 | 350,600 | a | na | l-ME | 1.79 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| Gag 17–34 | EKI | A*0301 | 1 | 350,600 | b | na | l-ME | 1.48 | 0.28 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.12 | |
|
| Nef 185–202 | FDSRLAFHHIARELHPEY | A*0201 | 4 | 7,800 | a | na | e-ME | 2.43 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 0.56 |
|
| Vif 113–130 | DCFSESAIRGAILGHIVS | undetermined | 4 | 898,100 | a | 1 | e-ME | 2.46 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.49 | 1.09 |
| Nef 177–194 | EKEV | A*0201 | 4 | 898,100 | b | 2 | e-ME | 4.61 | 1.27 | 0.75 | 0.52 | 1.10 | |
| Env 6–20 | NYQHLWRGGIMLLWRGIM | undetermined | 6 | 73,300 | c | 2 | e-ME | 3.06 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.90 | |
| Nef 89–106 | FFL | B*0140 | 6 | 73,300 | d | 4 | l-ME | 1.15 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.29 | 0.85 | |
| Pol 633–650 | ELQAIHL | A*0201 | 6 | 73,300 | e | 4 | l-ME | 1.51 | 0.79 | 0.60 | 0.32 | 0.79 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
a.The position refers to the position in the HXB2 sequence.
b.Optimal defined or predicted epitopic sequences are reported in bold.
c. "Undetermined": no epitopes recognized within restricting alleles expressed by the patients have been previously reported.
d. Indicates time of the earliest frequency of response detected by ICS assay.
e. Virus load (VL) detected at the correspondent week of T cell response (d) is reported in copies/ml.
f. The letters indicate the ranking based on appearance of escape mutations or lack thereof. The same letter are used in Figure 5 to indicate the correspondent epitope.
g. Epitopes dysplaying mutations related to T cell responses and evidence for variation escape within 55 and 87 WFOSx are listed as early (e-ME) or late (l-ME), respectively; those without evidence for variation and escape are reported as nME. Escape mutant epitopes are listed in order of appearance within each subject.
h. The numbers reflect the Shannon entropy as indicated in the Methods section. The higher is the value, the higher is the likelihood for the region to allow for variability in the sequence.
i. Each column reports the frequency (Freq) of the population of interest as % of total memory CD8+ T cells.
Figure 4Timing of escape of each epitope relative to the first CD8+ T-cell responses.
In studies of this kind, the timing of escape mutations and rate of loss of the transmitted form of epitope are based on limited temporal sampling of viral RNA from the plasma. Therefore, the time that immune escape was initiated can only be resolved to a period between the sample where only the transmitted epitope was present, and the sample where the first evidence of the accumulation of escape mutations appears. Similarly, the loss of the transmitted form can be prolonged or rapid, and in some cases was still ongoing at the last time point sampled. To illustrate and rank the order of escape while conveying the uncertainty of the rate and timing due to inevitable limitations in sampling, we used gradations of a grey bar, fading in during the period between the two samples when selection first is initiated, and ending at the sample where the transmitted form was no longer evident; the transmitted form diminishes through this period, and escape forms accumulate, indicated by the darkening gray. If the transmitted form was still present in the last available sample, we ended with a question mark to indicate selection was still ongoing. Four epitopes that elicited ICS responses that showed no evidence for escape during the course of the study are highlighted in red. Open blue circles indicate the timing of the sample where the first CD8+ T cell response was observed against the epitope, the light blue dots indicate time with the highest response to the epitope (HRS). The rank order of escape (reported for each epitope listed in within each patient by the lower case letter as ”epitope”) provides the values used for the correlation tests comparing order of escape to epitope entropy and the fraction of CD8+ T cell subtypes.
Figure 5Analysis of functional profile of responses to mutating and non-mutating epitopes.
The relative contributions of each functional family to the total CD8 T cell response are reported within each pie chart for epitopes that mutated within 55 (early-mutating: e-ME) and 56–87 WFOSx (late-mutating: l-ME) and for those that did not mutate (non-mutating: nME) epitopes. A) Profile of responses within 12 weeks FOSx. B) Profile of responses at the time of detection of the highest response by ICS (peak). The color code for each functional family is reported below the x-axis of the graph. In the graph each dot represents a single epitope. The color code for each group of epitopes is reported at the bottom of the figure. The grey bar represents the inter-quartile distribution of relative frequency of each functional family for the e-ME-, l-ME, and nME responses.
Figure 6Analysis of individual functions and polyfunctional subsets.
The analysis of the responses at the earliest (panels A and B) and highest recorded (panels C and D) time points are shown. The pie charts represent the relative contribution to the total response of cells exhibiting each functional parameter or combination of functional parameters. The color code for each parameter (pie slice) is reported below the x-axis of the graph. In the graph, each triangle represents the early (e-ME), late (l-ME), and non-mutating (nME) epitope-specific CD8+ T cell response detected at each time point by ICS. The color code for each group of epitopes is reported at the bottom of the figure. The grey bars represent the inter-quartile distribution of the relative frequency of each functional parameter. The dots under the x-axis represent the positive responses for each parameter. (A and C) Total MIP-1β+ responses are compared to the total responses detected as any combination of the other parameters excluding MIP-1β. (B and D) Analysis of the single or combined contribution of degranulation (CD107), IFN-γ and MIP-1β production is represented by the dots under the x-axis.