| Literature DB >> 31067277 |
Georgia de Assis Dias Alves1, Rebeca Oliveira de Souza1, Hervé Louis Ghislain Rogez2, Hitoshi Masaki3, Maria José Vieira Fonseca1.
Abstract
Cecropia obtusa is popularly used in the Amazonian region and exhibits antioxidant activity. Cosmetic formulations containing C. obtusa extract are commercially available for purchase; however, the chemical composition and the effects of the topical application of the extract are not described in the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the main components of C. obtusa for the first time and to assess the anti aging effect in human fibroblasts and keratinocytes exposed to UVR. The main components in C. obtusa extract were identified by LC-DAD-MS/MS as chlorogenic acid (CGA), luteolin-C-hexoside, luteolin-C-hexose-O-deoxy-hexose, and apigenin-C-hexose-O-deoxy-hexose. C. obtusa extract and CGA decreased the metalloproteinase-1 and protein carbonyl levels and increased the collagen and hyaluronic acid contents. Overall, the extract exhibited better activity than CGA, and we demonstrated the ability of the extract to protect against the UV-induced increase in the pro inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6, which are potential pathways of the antioxidant and anti aging effect. The chemical characterization added important data to broaden the knowledge related to C. obtusa, and the results suggest that the extract is a promising candidate to be incorporated in topical photochemoprotective formulations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067277 PMCID: PMC6505949 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Chromatograms of Cecropia obtusa leaf extract at UV detection wavelength of 320 nm (a), ESIMS (negative mode) (b), ESIMS (positive mode) (c).
Compound identification in Cecropia obtusa leaf extract by LC-MS/MS.
| Peak | RT (min) | Substance/class | UV (nm) | Negative Mode | Positive Mode | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | MS/MS | MS | MS/MS | ||||
| 1 | 14.9 | 3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid | 296.325 | 353 [M-H]- | 353→ 191 | 355[M+H]+ | 355→ 163 |
| 2 | 25.4 | Luteolin-C-hexoside | 269.348 | 447[M-H]- | 447→ 429, 357, 327 | 449[M+H]+ | 449→ 431, 383, 353, 329 |
| 3 | 25.7 | Luteolin-C-hexose-O-deoxy-hexose | 269.349 | 593[M-H]- | 593→ 473, 429, 357, 309 | 595[M+H]+ | 595→ 449, 431, 383, 329 |
| 4 | 32.3 | Apigenin-C-hexose-O-deoxy-hexose | 269.337 | 577 [M-H]- | 577→ 457, 413, 340, 293 | 579[M+H]+ | 579→ 433, 415, 367, 313 |
Fig 2Microscopic images (100 μm) of HDF cells (a) treated with 20 (b), 40 (c) and 1000 (d) μg/mL of Cecropia obtusa extract, cell viability (e), and protein content (f) of HDF cells treated with different concentrations of C. obtusa extract.
Fig 3Protein carbonyl (a), Hyaluronic Acid (b) and Collagen (c) contents and Metalloproteinase-1 relative expression (d). Results are presented as the means ± SEM (n = 3). * Different from positive control (PC- cells that were irradiated but not treated) after analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s test at p < 0.05. NC: Negative control positive control (cells that were neither treated nor irradiated); CGA: chlorogenic acid.
Fig 4IL-1β (a) and IL-6 contents (b) in HaCaT cells exposed to UVB radiation and treated with different concentrations of Results are presented as the means ± SEM (n = 3). * Different from positive control (PC- cells that were irradiated but not treated) after analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s test at p < 0.05. NC: Negative control (cells that were neither treated nor irradiated).