| Literature DB >> 35335428 |
Olga Fedotova1, Dmitry Myalenko1, Nataliya Pryanichnikova1, Elena Yurova1, Evgeniya Agarkova1.
Abstract
The aspects of component visualization of the antimicrobial triterpenoids (betulin) additive, both on the surface and in the bulk of the polymer, constituting food film packaging, are considered. This paper presents new knowledge about the morphology and surface structure of modified films using three independent methodological approaches: optical microscopy; a histological method adapted to packaging materials; and a method of attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) spectroscopy in the infrared region with Fourier transform. The use of these methods shows the betulin granules, individual or forming chains. To visualize the antimicrobial additive in the polymer bulk, a modified histological method adapted for film materials and attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) spectroscopy in the infrared region were used with Fourier transform using a Lumos Bruker microscope (Germany) (ATR crystal based on germanium). Sample sections were analyzed using Leica 818 blades at an angle of 45 degrees. The histological method consists of the study of a biological object thin section, in the transmitted light of a microscope, stained with contrast dyes to reveal its structures, and placed on a glass slide. In the method modified for the present study, instead of a biological one, a synthetic object was used, namely the developed film materials with the addition of natural organic origin. Individual granules are about 2 µm long; chains can be up to 10 µm long. The thickness of the granules ranged from 1 to 1.5 microns. It can be seen that the depth distribution of granules in the film from the inner surface to the outer one is rather uniform. Spectroscopic studies using the method of automatic ATR mapping in the region of 880 cm-1 made it possible to evaluate the distribution of an antimicrobial additive based on triterpenoids on the surface and in the polymer bulk.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; betulin visualization; microstructure; modified packaging; optical microscopy; polyethylene film; triterpenoids
Year: 2022 PMID: 35335428 PMCID: PMC8953123 DOI: 10.3390/polym14061097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic work diagram.
Figure 2Betulinol molecule structure.
Betulin dependence on the birch type.
| № | Birch | Betulin Mass Fraction, % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 2 |
| 27 |
| 3 |
| 14 |
| 4 |
| 44 |
Physical and chemical LDPE properties [6].
| No. | Indicator | Dimension | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Density | g/cm2 | 0.918–0.930 |
| 2 | Breaking stress in disease | kgf/cm2 | 100–170 |
| 3 | Breaking stress in static bending | kgf/cm2 | 120–170 |
| 4 | Breaking stress at shear | kgf/cm2 | 140–170 |
| 5 | Relative strength at break | % | 500–600 |
| 6 | Elasticity modulus in bending | kgf/cm2 | 1200–2600 |
| 7 | Hygiene yield strength | kgf/cm2 | 90–160 |
| 8 | Relative attachment at the beginning of the current | % | 15–20 |
| 9 | Brinell hardness | kgf/mm2 | 1.4–2.5 |
The main extract characteristics.
| No. | Indicator | Actual Result |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Water mass fraction, % | Cream-colored powder, with a specific characteristic odor | |
| 2 | Quantitative betulinol content, % | 1.0 |
| 3 | Water mass fraction, % | 70–98 |
|
| ||
| 4 | Lead, mg/kg | Less than 0.15 |
| 5 | Arsenic, mg/kg | Less than 0.02 |
| 6 | Cadmium, mg/kg | Less than 0.015 |
| 7 | Mercury, mg/kg | Less than 0.01 |
|
| ||
| 8 | Hexachlorocyclohexane (α, β, γ-isomers), mg/kg | Not found |
| 9 | DDT and its metabolites, mg/kg | Not found |
| 10 | Heptachlor, mg/kg | Not found |
| 11 | Aldrin, mg/kg | Not found |
|
| ||
| 12 | QMAFAnM, CFU/g | Less than 10 |
| 13 | CB (coliforms) in 0.1 g | NA |
| 14 | NA | |
| 15 | Pathogenic, including salmonella in 10.0 g | NA |
| 16 | Yeast and mold, CFU/g | 20 |
* Depending on the concentration of the initial active ingredient (betulinol), the physicochemical indicators of the additive may vary.
Figure 3The exterior of the superconcentrate granules.
Polyethylene-based concentrates.
| Base Polymer | Polymer: Extract Ratio | Extract Content in Concentrate, % | Extract Concentration, % | Active Betulin Content, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDPE | 9:1 | 10 | 70 | 4.90 |
| LDPE | 9:1 | 10 | 78 | 5.46 |
| LDPE | 9:1 | 20 | 78 | 5.46 |
| LDPE | 9:1 | 10 | 80 | 5.60 |
| LDPE | 9:1 | 10 | 90 | 6.30 |
Figure 4Microphotographs of the sample surface of LDPE film modified with betulin at different magnifications.
Figure 5Photomicrographs of the surface of a betulin-modified LDPE film.
Figure 6Surface microstructure of modified PA/LDPE film: (a) PA/LDPE (control), (b) PA/LDPE (0.5% additive in polyethylene layer).
Figure 7Cross section of a film with an extract concentration of 1% (63× magnification).
Figure 8The inner surface of the film with betulin diffused from the film (2.3× magnification).
Figure 9Internal Surface Mapping of PA/LDPE Multilayer Film.
Figure 10The inner surface of the “old” film with betulin diffused from the polymer is a dark zone. 20× magnification.
Efficiency of films disinfection with different content of betulin in relation to yeasts, mold fungi, and CB.
| Additive Concentration (Betulin), % | Actual Result, Lg Nm/Nc | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yeasts | Mold Fungi | CB | |
| 70 | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.02 |
| 78 | 1.10 ± 0.04 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 1.74 ± 0.02 |
| 80 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 1.76 ± 0.01 |
| 98 | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 1.78 ± 0.01 |